1
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares 3.0 - It Is Time
« on: June 28, 2016, 01:27:43 pm »
I think PoW should no be more than 50% share of block generation, otherwise the "soul" of Bitshares is become PoW.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
We have referred more users to bitshares than anyone else.
Users we have referred are driving volume here daily.
We are driving transactions.. not just for bitshares but for other projects too like metaexchange.
Note that our operation in forums is located under the 'marketing' section.
I can't spell out and connect all the dots for what this project means to BitShares and DPOS/POWs overall for reasons that others who support this understand. But myself and others that support this can assure you, there is nothing wasteful about this.. just what I have evidenced already above shows the potential buy/sell created by this operation.
Have a private chat with fuzz if you like to learn more about the bigger picture of what we are doing. I think you will like it given what you have already said.
Out of curiosity though.. exactly what will 6 delegates controlled by one entity/company do to Bitshares? Please elaborate how this will cause the network, system, and or DPOS to fail.
If there was any reason I thought it would bring harm I wouldn't do it. You seem to think it will.. so help me out.
Why are you running 6 delegates. A lot of voters would be turned off by such large number of delegates run by the same person from the same location.
Low market cap, low transactions, low liquidity, and low user adoption are even bigger turn offs I think.
Our Delegate bid hits on raising all that among other things. You are welcome to explore the why at http://vote.bunkermining.com that is stated at the very beginning.
The need for 6 is was only driven by community support and the ow market cap reality of bitshares for what is required of this operation.
Voting for our delegates means a vote for higher market cap and raising BitShares standing in the crypto space overall.
I also think having delegates elected that don't even have servers operational is far worse, which was what this thread is about.
If the idea that someone operating 6 delegates who is building up bitshares and maintaining responsible delegate infrastructure for the network in contrast to that is somehow a turn-off in contrast to having delegates in the 101 that dont' even exist, then I can't argue that.
Keep in mind we already have someone (btsnow) with 4 delegates for a long time now, and Bitshares has survived.
Moonstone has had designs to get 5 Delegates elected as part of their crowdfund.
Our bid is quite different though.. everything we do flows back to BitShares and creates a buy/sell market pressure that is consistent day to day. We need to expand.. now.
Yes, NOTEs are trading on BitShares. If you import your AGS and PTS keys, you should see them in your BitShares wallet.