oh sorry , i think i should have started with my definition of capitalism, here we go:
For me capitalism is our actual system based on infinite growth.
Infinite growth is the esence of capitalism and its result from competition.
Competition in the system impose to each capitalist the necessity of growing
Instead of using blockchain technologies for expanding competition , how about using them for expanding cooperation?
Tipon, do you really think you're going to get anywhere around here denouncing capitalism? Have you not noticed that capitalism is a popular word on these forums?
Here's my suggestion: come up with some other word for the evil system you're describing. The word "capitalism" has too many meanings. To you, it means greedy unsustainable growth and development, but to a lot of people around here it means something much less sinister: something like "the concept that people should be able to own things freely without someone else violently taking them away."
I'm just trying to give you some friendly advice to help you get your point across better. I hate seeing people shooting themselves in the foot through poor choice of words.
Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2
What we have today is better considered "crony capitalism". Also, the idea of infinite growth is well and good with respect to innovation. Many of the people today sayjng that the earth cannot provide for all of us not only are introducing dangerous strawmen problems, but also implying only one solution--which has actually worked out FAR worse historically for humanity than the initial "perceived" problems. Sustainability will not come from a central authority dictating our lives, but from competition to create systems that benefit the largest number of people with the smallest possible input of resources. Let us try not to unnecessarily attribute the the problems that were a byproduct of an outdated paradigm to our inability to sustain "growth". Rather lets change our conceptualization of what growth is so it does not limit our potential.
The people who drastically change our world for the better are ALWAYS told by the flock that their dreams are impossible. They manufacture reasons why we cant instead of asking "how can we?"
I would argue we have never realy experienced true capitalism and that America was the closest we've ever been to it...and even today I do not see innovators from all over the world fleeing to other countries in the hope of giving their impossible dreams a chance to be realized.
Sustainability is not the problem...our willingness to discount the power of human ingenuity, given proper motivation is our only problem. Anyone who says otherwise wants to enslave you to their own, dangerously narrow perception of reality.
People really need to research Enron, "Blood and Gore", and there proposed carbon exchanges...it perfectly sets us up for a better understanding of how Agenda 21 is destroying markets and hurting the world population. From there its just a hop skip and jump to 9/11, the "War on Terror" ( which, ironically only serves to perpetuate it), the 2008 stock market attack (it
was economic warfare), the larry summers memos, and the "New World Order".
We have ALL the tools we'll ever need. The question is: will we let those in power let their myopic fears of losing control frame the debate with Warnings of Impossibility...or will we ask forgivness from the scared sheep AFTER proving the nay-sayers wrong?