Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Thul3

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 39
361
General Discussion / Re: would you support a cheater as the wintess?
« on: April 27, 2019, 07:37:53 am »
In the rest of the world the price you need to pay for ANY crypto is the price on exchange and the exchange rate from fiat to crypto.
Why is the price of any crypto in the world not the real price including the exchange rate ?

The answer because markets can't add the cost of exchange rate from any gateway and therefor they list only the market price.
If you pay a 1% ,3% ,5% or -2% gateway fee thats your choice.

I would like also to ask to stop following bitcrab blindly because its annoying seeing people with the same question which clearly try to enforce his agenda.
Use your own mind instead of following someone blindly

The result of your request (bitcrabs agenda) would be that we would have no more arbitrage for margin calls.


362
Quote
every bts holder who want to become one part of the witness, and should get the reward from the minting, not only the witness.

This would make that people would only vote for active witness
non active = no reward

363
What is there interresting ?
After the revive some people are moving back to bitusd as there are some opportunities on assets against bitusd.
Myself included.

364
Why do you call facts about somebody forcing the rest of the community his point of view with diffrent tactics a personal attack ?

Would he be attacked when not doing the shady staff ?

I mean he is continously attacking witnesses which doesn't feed like he requests it.There is no consensus or anything.
He has no trouble publicly naming names and attacking them and threatening of down voting.
The only diffrence he has no more so much voting power like before so he took ZB into his ship to get his power back.

Thats a clear unethical move to enforce his point of view only not accepting the votes of current bigger stake holders.

I know no other projects where funds on exchanges are allowed being used against its own investors interrest.

Did ZB spent a single dime for these BTS ?No.Do they give something in return ?No .
And the claim that people can withdrawl their BTS anytime is also not valid.We have CEX'es for liquidity and they are needed but it should be not be a call between liquidity or decentralisation.

I mean if bitcrab took ZB on board it takes a bit of time and we will have ZB,Poloniex,Huobi,Binance here where these 4 proxies will decide about everything on bitshares with their BTS wallets.

How can you call something like that decentralised and more important representing investors opinion where they didn't spend a single dime on BTS.

Bitcrab is clearly not stepping back from the quick MCR change and i'm tired always to accept these kind of mistakes where somebody is abusing the system to enforce his own agenda .
I already stepped back on OMO fund and BSIP42 .Am not going to step back each time he has a new wonderfull experimental idea risking all investors money.

I didn't invested majority of my personal money into BTS so somebody could play with them like monopoly money not accepting any community decission and always looking for a way even unethical one to implement his own agenda.
I invested into BTS because i belived in the decentralisation and more important high educated members.But i didn't invested because of a one man show who is trying everything to enforce his own personal agenda which in my eyes is only economical based with no fundamentals.


Somebody can explain to me why bitcrab contacted Binance when they had OL as proxy set ?
Seems he has no more issues with that as long it's him who is being able to tell the exchange what to vote for.


I see these kind of votes very unethical both for exchanges and beos.
Thats also why i made it very clear i won't put a single BTS for the rainfall as long as these BTS can be used for voting.


365
Quote
surely users will borrow more, no doubt.

smartcoin lost some reputation because the GS of bitUSD, and because smartcoin is always in shortage, not because GS protection or margin call orders. some margin call orders stay there is not a problem.

Smartcoin lost their reputation because of Bsip42 and your OMO fund which leaded into a GS.BitCNY would be also in the GS if there would be no protection.It was you who drove them both in that situation with your permanent ignorace of other voices forcing everyone to push only your own point of view.
I didn't saw much action from you when bitcny was near gs.It was basicly fav and some other people trying to safe the ship.
People left smartcoins because it was your past actions which took their investment hostage and made that their CR wen't from 1.75 to under 1.1 where they lost majority of their investment to cheap buyers.Would the system have worked as it should they would have safed a lot of their investments.

The question here is not if somebody is going to borrow more but which timing will have a way better positive effect.
Your solution is clearly a waste of the reduce of MCR.

More important you said yourself in the past that you don't care about other opinions but only to achieve your own personal targets.
You even went so far to use ZB's wallet to vote for your own agenda which is very unethical and which is clearly against majority of community will.

Your past 12 months actions were ALL A TOTAL DISTASTER

You are like a grasshopper jumping from one shit into another shit.

Your OMO fund a total disaster costing the community millions and millions of BTS and reducing the value of BTS massivly.
Your BSIP42 causing the GS and massiv reputation loss.Part of community left because they lost nearly everything thanks to your BS BSIP42.
Your smartcoin bounty fund.You created it and just left it.We wasted nearly 2 million BTS for Biki and LAtoken .

These are the results of your past actions.

Now you are wasting a one time possibility to reduce MCR from 1.75 to 1.6 in a downtrend for what ?

Explain to me where is your issue waiting 1- 1 1/2 months ?

Where do you see the massiv amount of benefit reducing the MCR right at the moment risking that it effect will be marginal ?


And to be more clear i joined as proxy to protect the community and get the best out of bitshares also when it means to accept other point of views if they make sense.

You instead are accepting no other opinion and are so much dedicated to force your own point of view that you even go unethical ways.

Should this not stop i will go the same way as you do to protect the investors funds which you have no right to put in risk like you did in the past.

Also the voting would be not approved would you not use your shady tactics which i won't tolarate anymore.

I accepted you for a long time but forcing everyone to always accept only your own personal point of view using diffrent kind of shady actions ends to get any support of mine.

Also your defamation tactics on people like witnesses who doesn't change their settings to your personal favorised one won't be just ignored by me anymore.

The failure of bisp42 is due to the witness's wrong execution mode. The idea was originally completely correct.


I guess the OMO fund which has been margin called was also witnesses mistakes ?That somebody reduced himself the CR from 4 to under 2 ?
Did you even watched what it caused ?
It caused that people took away they big buy orders knowing the price will massivly drop thanks to these big margin walls which haven't been eaten at all.

A good example it brother-john who took all his big buy orders at 0.6 cny away putting them back in at 0.22 or 0.23 .
Thats a result of his actions.The OMO fund instead of supporting BTS price and creating liquidity was taking surpressing the BTS price and actually taking away liquidity.

A BSIP42 causing that no margin calls have been eaten causing that all margin calls which entered under 1.75 were taken hostage and went all the way down under a CR of 1.1 where these investors you can say lost their whole investment thanks to your risky experiments .

Would the system work as it is supposed they would have safed majority of their investment and would have taken later new debt.

Now thanks to Bitcrabs action from the past BTS is getting more and ore centralised to people who don't take debt like brother-john.

Bitcrab is always looking for new shitty solutions for issues he created himself.


Now he wants new debt.........but it was basicly him who made tons of debt holders lose majority of their investment and surpressed the BTS price and by doing so the amount of debt by using the OMO fund in his own way against community consensus and worker proposal to buy at the end his own debt at a high BTS price using the OMO fund.

366
General Discussion / Re: would you support a cheater as the wintess?
« on: April 26, 2019, 01:54:49 pm »
The feed price should not be lower than the actual price that investors would pay if they bought BTS in the DEX.
It is now 2% lower.This is an important reason why the recharge rate is too high.

Thats total nonsense.
Any whale could dictate the feedprice on DEX

367
Quote
surely users will borrow more, no doubt.

smartcoin lost some reputation because the GS of bitUSD, and because smartcoin is always in shortage, not because GS protection or margin call orders. some margin call orders stay there is not a problem.

Smartcoin lost their reputation because of Bsip42 and your OMO fund which leaded into a GS.BitCNY would be also in the GS if there would be no protection.It was you who drove them both in that situation with your permanent ignorace of other voices forcing everyone to push only your own point of view.
I didn't saw much action from you when bitcny was near gs.It was basicly fav and some other people trying to safe the ship.
People left smartcoins because it was your past actions which took their investment hostage and made that their CR wen't from 1.75 to under 1.1 where they lost majority of their investment to cheap buyers.Would the system have worked as it should they would have safed a lot of their investments.

The question here is not if somebody is going to borrow more but which timing will have a way better positive effect.
Your solution is clearly a waste of the reduce of MCR.

More important you said yourself in the past that you don't care about other opinions but only to achieve your own personal targets.
You even went so far to use ZB's wallet to vote for your own agenda which is very unethical and which is clearly against majority of community will.

Your past 12 months actions were ALL A TOTAL DISTASTER

You are like a grasshopper jumping from one shit into another shit.

Your OMO fund a total disaster costing the community millions and millions of BTS and reducing the value of BTS massivly.
Your BSIP42 causing the GS and massiv reputation loss.Part of community left because they lost nearly everything thanks to your BS BSIP42.
Your smartcoin bounty fund.You created it and just left it.We wasted nearly 2 million BTS for Biki and LAtoken .

These are the results of your past actions.

Now you are wasting a one time possibility to reduce MCR from 1.75 to 1.6 in a downtrend for what ?

Explain to me where is your issue waiting 1- 1 1/2 months ?

Where do you see the massiv amount of benefit reducing the MCR right at the moment risking that it effect will be marginal ?


And to be more clear i joined as proxy to protect the community and get the best out of bitshares also when it means to accept other point of views if they make sense.

You instead are accepting no other opinion and are so much dedicated to force your own point of view that you even go unethical ways.

Should this not stop i will go the same way as you do to protect the investors funds which you have no right to put in risk like you did in the past.

Also the voting would be not approved would you not use your shady tactics which i won't tolarate anymore.

I accepted you for a long time but forcing everyone to always accept only your own personal point of view using diffrent kind of shady actions ends to get any support of mine.

Also your defamation tactics on people like witnesses who doesn't change their settings to your personal favorised one won't be just ignored by me anymore.

368
General Discussion / Re: vote witness : ioex,Get dividends
« on: April 26, 2019, 01:08:19 pm »
server expense 200 CNY

Must be a high end dedicated server

369
BEOS / Re: BitShares EOS (BEOS) Launches - Get Yours
« on: April 26, 2019, 07:15:59 am »
You guys decreased the amount of active witnesses from 23 to 19 .Its a big harm to the bitshares network as it took ages to get us good witnesses.
I would like to ask to add some more witness votes to get us back more active witnesses so they won't leave us.

Who are you recommending? Do they support our efforts to bring a new path of success to bitshares? We have especially been looking for support in our efforts to stop censorship of the BEOS project  in the Bitshares Dex Telegram channel.

So you are going only to support witnesses who will fully support you and are not allowed to have another point of view?

Because i still think

openledger-dc,magicwallet.witness ,witness.yao,witness.still  were very decent witnesses.
If they support BEOS i have no clue but decreasing the amount of witnesses to 19 now 21 is nothing positiv in the longrun in my opinion

370
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: April 26, 2019, 07:09:58 am »
Let's be realistic ZB is voting what Bitcrab is telling them to vote.

He posted himself earlier that he is going to tell them what to vote for.

Quote
Also, BitShares-core comes with a lower limit of 11 witnesses - can't go below that.

So they are voting now to have a max of 11 witnesses.

Would love to know if the community agrees with this low amount of witnesses.

Also it was raised that ZB using their members BTS is very unethical and bitcrabs argumentation was they won't harm bitshares ecosystem.
I see voting only for 2 witnesses with such a big stake as harm expecially as it was dicussed before that voting only for themself won't be recognised by the system as a low number voting.

371
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: April 25, 2019, 11:57:22 pm »
Would you vote for a witness and committee member who uses BTS from an exchange wallet to vote only for 2 witnesses for the entire bitshares ecosystem ?


Bitcrab is currently voting with the BTS in ZB's wallet that the whole bitshares ecosystem should only have 2 witnesses in total.


Is he doing a good job with that voting ?

372
Quote
reducing MCR means we can get more bitCNY supply and make better pegging.
Nearly noone is going to create new debt to go long on BTS during a downtrend.Thats nonsense.You would waste the power of decreasing  MCR.

Quote
GS? we have GS protection, it's not a big problem.
Its a pegg and reputation problem.We lost already enough supporters and reputation on our bitassets.Margins are not really gettin eaten because you took away big part of possibility of arbitrage.
Its like taking debt holders who were not able to decrease risk quickly enough into hostage which may lead into a total loss thanks to the margin call not being eaten.

Quote
to increase MCR at current time is just like Federal Reserve to increase interest at Great Depression, it will make everything worse.
Noone is increasing the MCR.MCR will just stay the same till we have a clear signal.End of April ,begin of may there will be high possibility for a golden cross in trading analytics.
This golden cross was in the past a very strong signal for big final dump.

You need to weigh up what has a bigger positiv effect in the longrun for BTS.
A MCR decrease in a downtrend where we could see even a final very low price of BTS
or a MCR decrease at bottom or positiv longterm signal .

You will get way more new debt in the second option and you are attracting external traders to join the pump bringing BTS quickly back up again where it belongs.
Decreasing MCR during downtrend won't attract any trader at all.


Quote
reducing MCR means we can get more bitCNY supply and make better pegging.

How does it come you are always worried about better pegging but never about losing pegg because of a CR going under 1 ?

373
BEOS / Re: BitShares EOS (BEOS) Launches - Get Yours
« on: April 25, 2019, 09:02:02 pm »
You guys decreased the amount of active witnesses from 23 to 19 .Its a big harm to the bitshares network as it took ages to get us good witnesses.
I would like to ask to add some more witness votes to get us back more active witnesses so they won't leave us.

374
General Discussion / Re: Mrs bitcrabiness / shut down the internet
« on: April 24, 2019, 08:48:18 am »
i guess a translation from chinese to english

375
Quote
Since you have get the bounty, is there a timeline for listing? Thanks.

Does it mean Committee approved payment for LAtoken or even for the bigger shitty exchange IDCM ?
If yes i would like to know which committee member signed for it.

Congrats to throwing out funds for horse shit.
Seeing all the big amount proposals now coming to get voted in i would love to know how you want to pay for any decent exchange.

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 39