2亿元收不到50%筹码，估计连20%都收不到。2000万砸进去，都能让价格翻个至少几十倍。

compiling 70%

very annoying.
if you are not up to date in this crypto world all the time you get ripped off.

i mean there was no notice at all in the beginning where i joined them and now they "steal" 5000 USD just like that.

Would be great if there are some other affected people so we might be able to put some pressure on them.

I don't think they are "stealing", they maintain hundreds of currency pair, much more than BTER does, I don't think they have enough man power to research each one. The recommended way to redeem for PTS is always hold them in your local wallet, otherwise you WILL miss out on some DAC distributions, even at BTER, it might not redeem some smaller DAC for you if it's not traded on their exchange.

Always remember, if you don't hold the private key, you are not the owner, and depends on what the exchange will "allow" you to own.

Quote from: kokojie on August 28, 2014, 07:41:45 pm

Quote from: szert on August 28, 2014, 11:49:10 am

Thanks for the answers.

So does it mean that Invictus makes all the decisions on the DAC toolkit and DAC Sun Ltd. is in control of the rules of BitshareX?
Let's take the example of the account registration fee change. It has been increased recently according to some of the forum posts. Who made that decision?
I'm not arguing about that particular decision just thinking about the future: there might be minor and major tweaks needed in the complex parameters of the system. Some of those might affect different participants and stakeholders differently.  Any thoughts how these decisions will be discussed with the shareholders? Do the stakeholders have any say/vote on those apart from selling their stocks?

You don't decide what goes on in Bitcoin development neither, why treat BTSX differently? Bitcoin transaction fee has changed at least 5 times in the past, I didn't get to vote on any of those changes. It's because the community mostly trust the Dev team to make good decisions, if you can't trust the Devs to make good decisions, you should either stay away from the eco-system or if you like the concept too much, just fork it and start your own eco-system.

I didn't ask this question to compare BTSX to Bitcoin. I do see the issues there. Neither I necessarily asked for voting.
I think the Bitshare(X) is a great concept and I do trust the devs, that's why I'm here We just need to think about these questions for several reasons (eg. gain trust from a wider community ). I don't think all these question should/can be addressed right now but discussions helps to form community consensus and create explicit answers for questions which can come up in any potential newbie like me.

(off topic side note: the transaction fee in bitcoin up to the client, isn't? Perhaps you referred to clients changing the default fee? Or is the fee up to the client with BTSX too?)

The default transaction fee in the official Bitcoin client is not easily changeable and is set by the Bitcoin Dev Team. You have to use a custom client to change the fee. Vast majority of Bitcoin users, pay the default fee.

The default fee in the BTSX client is changeable as of the current version I believe.

Not bad, we fooled the FBI into ignoring us...

haha 

That's why it's called 0.4.9, not 1.x.x, the version number means it's alpha software. This has only released for 2 months, do you think Bitcoin was problem free 2 months after release? Bitcoin still had a messy accidental hard fork + nasty transaction malleability bug, 4 YEARS after release.

Thanks for the answers.

So does it mean that Invictus makes all the decisions on the DAC toolkit and DAC Sun Ltd. is in control of the rules of BitshareX?
Let's take the example of the account registration fee change. It has been increased recently according to some of the forum posts. Who made that decision?
I'm not arguing about that particular decision just thinking about the future: there might be minor and major tweaks needed in the complex parameters of the system. Some of those might affect different participants and stakeholders differently.  Any thoughts how these decisions will be discussed with the shareholders? Do the stakeholders have any say/vote on those apart from selling their stocks?

You don't decide what goes on in Bitcoin development neither, why treat BTSX differently? Bitcoin transaction fee has changed at least 5 times in the past, I didn't get to vote on any of those changes. It's because the community mostly trust the Dev team to make good decisions, if you can't trust the Devs to make good decisions, you should either stay away from the eco-system or if you like the concept too much, just fork it and start your own eco-system.

Somewhere on your account page, it should tell you how long has your oldest BTSX has been inactive (and also how long do you have until a inactivity fee is charged), and maybe a convenient button to send 100% of the fund to yourself (minus the fee).