196
General Discussion / Re: 0.4.9 appears to be broken
« on: August 28, 2014, 05:29:11 pm »
I had no crashes though, with any version since 0.4.3. Running on commandline with Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS 64bit
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
197
General Discussion / Re: When will the next BTSX pump and dump happen?
« on: August 28, 2014, 05:16:15 pm »I bought a ton of Bitcoin at $11 around May 2011, and it subsequently dropped to $2. Was I screwed?
I would wait, but I need to sell a quarter of what I bought at higher than 0.000110 before the end of the year.
Then don't invest in high risk asset with money you need by end of the year. I held my Bitcoin for 2 years before it went higher than my purchase price.
198
General Discussion / Re: Delegates, please response to this thread if your delegate updated to 0.4.9
« on: August 28, 2014, 04:14:41 am »
kokojie updated to 0.4.9
Looks like there's a lack of connections though, I only have 2 connections.
Looks like there's a lack of connections though, I only have 2 connections.
199
General Discussion / Re: Delegates, please response to this thread if your delegate updated to 0.4.9
« on: August 28, 2014, 03:40:40 am »
Compiling 90%.
200
General Discussion / Re: When will the next BTSX pump and dump happen?
« on: August 27, 2014, 11:40:06 pm »
I bought a ton of Bitcoin at $11 around May 2011, and it subsequently dropped to $2. Was I screwed?
202
General Discussion / Re: Delegate upgrade question
« on: August 27, 2014, 04:21:06 pm »I do it like this:
1. Open a new terminal
2. Git clone latest version to new folder bitsharesx_v0.x.x
3. git checkout 0.x.x + submodule init+update + cmake . + make bitshares_client
4. Once compilation is done, return to still running instance of the client and do "getinfo"
5. Pick a time when there's 10+ minutes till my next block production time, then:
6. Shut down old client, start new client
7. wallet_open + wallet_unlock
8. Do getinfo to verify block_production is enabled
Cool, thanks.
203
General Discussion / Re: Delegate upgrade question
« on: August 27, 2014, 04:07:29 pm »You need to make sure only one instance has blocks production turned on.
When you are ready with the next version open it and wait for it to establish network connections and synchronize the blockchain (make sure block production is not enabled).
Then see that you have sufficient time until your slot and shutdown the old instance and enable block production in the new one.
You are saying I need to install at two machines? and when upgrading switch back and forth between the two?
204
BitShares PTS / Re: List of all DAC's since BTSX that PTS holders are entitled to???
« on: August 27, 2014, 03:55:04 pm »I need a list of all DAC's that snapshots of PTS have been taken since the snapshot for BTSX. I have had all my PTS in my own wallet since the BTSX snapshot and need to know all the DAC's im entitled to and their status. I would like to check all of my balances.
I have a thread right here that you could use and follow to obtain that information:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1425.0
205
General Discussion / Delegate upgrade question
« on: August 27, 2014, 03:45:16 pm »
When I upgrade to new version of the client as a delegate, do I have to first turn off block production? when block production is turned off, then I don't miss blocks right?
206
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Criteria for selecting delegates
« on: August 27, 2014, 02:55:07 pm »
I only run 1 delegate id, and my info see my signature.
207
General Discussion / Re: [BitShares Imagination] How do we buy coffee at Starbucks in the future?
« on: August 26, 2014, 03:05:54 pm »
Only problem is having an "iPhone" or "iWatch", since probably no one will use these garbage device from Apple in the future.
208
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: My plea to delegates and especially voting stakeholders: don't be shortsighted!
« on: August 26, 2014, 03:03:32 pm »lol ... I skrewed that one up .. yhea .. definitely
In German, the word offensive has a slightly different meaning ...
I think the word you were looking for is aggressively?
209
General Discussion / Re: How big a threat is the SEC?
« on: August 26, 2014, 01:19:50 pm »While doing my usual perusal of "anti-Bitshares" posts on the forums, one remark caught my eye. Some are of the opinion that the SEC will be ready to crack down on Bitshares as soon as it grows large enough to catch notice, due to illegal securities trading. My thought had been that since Bitshares is more of a "prediction market" in that the underlying assets are not truly being bought or sold, that this would not be a problem. However, I am not well versed in securities law nor am I sure that I entirely understand what is being bought or sold in these prediction markets, so I would definitely like to hear some thoughts on this matter from those more knowledgeable than I. Is the SEC ban hammer a threat?
Governments has been proven to fail to crack down on any decentralized protocol. Hell they can't even crack down on TPB, even though it's semi-centralized, and they tried pretty hard.
210
General Discussion / Re: Delegates: Post here once you have upgraded to 0.4.8
« on: August 26, 2014, 12:59:31 pm »
kokojie updated to 0.4.8
