You are right, I really mean bitassets - the committee owned and branded smartcoins. Thank you!
2021年之后，市场调整期间，比特股社区也做过几次智能币规则的修改尝试，试图恢复智能币的信誉，完善承兑功能。典型的一次短暂而彻底失败的尝试即所谓的负反馈精准锚定。第二次试验就是现在还在采用的方案，废弃锁死最低喂价，恢复最初的喂价方法，把黑天鹅全局清算改为最低抵押率清算，此时BitUSD市场早已全局清算，仅仅能维持BitCNY市场的半死状态，和死了也差不多。
记得就在前几年，比特股创始人BM离开比特股多年之后，又回访过一次比特股论坛，只提了一个问题，询问比特股当时的喂价方案，之后就没有再出现过。我猜想，他肯定是没有得到满意的答案，当然既然他提出这个问题，那就是说他也没有想到和发现满意的答案。再就是如果他找到了满意的答案，他有可能想在EOS上做个抵押锚定币方面的项目。
You talk about smartcoins, but you really mean bitassets - the committee owned and branded smartcoins.
Anyone can create their own privatized bitasset, free from outside influence, free from past bitshares prices, and many people have; see "honest.cny", "hertz", "hero", and the norns like "urthr" "skuld", and "verthandi" for example.
Some of these privatized smartcoins have good operational records with marketing being the limiting factor. You can create these to reference any asset as long as you have price feed scripts for them, with your own smartcoin config & black swan recovery methods set, no need for secondary chains to try out new smartcoin ideas (other than the test network).
The competitors to smartcoins don't seem to transparently demonstrate sufficient backing collateral, so no wonder competing with them is tough when they're effectively just passing off user issued assets on other chains with no proof/withdrawal mechanisms as the real deal.
You bring up a lack of innovation, but you haven't mentioned the liquidity pools, the reference UI spotlight features, suez order sends order mechanics, the expansion of "black swan recovery methods" for improving smartcoin development, NFT apps/galleries, Airdrop tech, the introduction of credit offer lending on chain neither?
You bring up death & failure, yet the blockchain blocks reliably continue to be produced every 3 seconds regardless of bizarre CEX behaviour. Good riddance to Binance, their platform brought centralization and downwards price action.
I'd note that the clone coin you mention didn't to a proper genesis so isn't a true fork & has an mcap 40x smaller than BTS as of this post, not a good look. They even modified their core to be fully centralized, banning accounts from the chain: https://github.com/bitshares-cnvote/newbitshares-core/blob/29c316e376f1a0925537b2e6dd0bf226c0df99bf/libraries/chain/evaluator.cpp#L81
I'd probably say encouraging new gateways to open up, and/or encouraging existing gateways to support new tokens should be on the road to revival, back when BTS was top 10 there were more than we have now. That and more UI development.
Recent Posts
