Main > Stakeholder Proposals

Bytemaster: "rather produce no than two blocks"

(1/1)

liondani:

--- Quote from: emski on December 20, 2014, 07:50:18 pm ---
--- Quote from: vikram on December 20, 2014, 07:39:01 pm ---Yes! Slower confirmation time is much better than a forked network! In the future, double-producing blocks could get your delegate account fired and retracted.

--- End quote ---

It is not only forked network. The security is much lower if delegates are able to easily sign 2 chains.
How can you be sure that your chain is OK even with 60% delegate participation ?
Who will prove to you that these delegates are not signing other chains with higher participation ?

--- End quote ---
same concerns here...

Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D

emski:

--- Quote from: vikram on December 20, 2014, 07:39:01 pm ---Yes! Slower confirmation time is much better than a forked network! In the future, double-producing blocks could get your delegate account fired and retracted.

--- End quote ---

It is not only forked network. The security is much lower if delegates are able to easily sign 2 chains.
How can you be sure that your chain is OK even with 60% delegate participation ?
Who will prove to you that these delegates are not signing other chains with higher participation ?

vikram:
Yes! Slower confirmation time is much better than a forked network! In the future, double-producing blocks could get your delegate account fired and retracted.

santaclause102:
I didn't see this direction propagated on this forum so here it is :) Here https://www.dropbox.com/s/0m0plhj8ggw2pi9/Mumble%20Chat%2012_19_2014%20with%20intro.ogg?dl=0  around minute 12 BM made clear what delegates are supposed to do in case of a fork.

Navigation

[0] Message Index