Wow, did you just suggest they're voting like this because of some far-fetched conspiracy involving Ethereum? A far more plausible answer would be that they're sick of Bitshares hard-forks and emergency hotfixes every couple of weeks and would like things to stabilize a little.
I don't think you're interpreting alt's post the right way, but as his English isn't the best it's certainly up for interpretation. In my opinion he's just saying he'll not vote for dilution workers no matter what at this point in time. Claiming that everyone anti-dilution are fueled by mindless stupidity is just ignorant, but you don't seem to want to listen to any arguments to the contrary. Everyone seems to want to frame this in terms of war terminology, "it's an attack on Bitshares" etc, perhaps that's just a product of our times, but doing so gets us nowhere.
You're putting words in alt's mouth saying he doesn't want more development for years to come and that he wants Bitshares to die, but nothing supports that theory. He simply has a different perspective on what is good for Bitshares in its current state, and since there's no direct correlation between development and market cap who knows, he might just be right. Like I said Fox's efforts had nothing to do with BTS development or worker proposals so it in no way supports your argument, in fact it supports alt's position.
Over a month ago a forum thread attempting to get the anti-dilution believers out to make their case regarding why they are against all workers was started.. I didn't start it.. but others in the community wanted to hear what it was all about. Guess what happened.. nothing. They got no response at all despite a real consorted effort to reach out. It's not ignorant, it's based on the information we have available.. which is primarily coming from alts commentaries and a few others who talk about 2014 mostly.
As for the words I put into alts mouth as you said.. I never said that.. that was you putting words into my mouth putting words into alts mouth. Yikes.
What we know is.. alts perspective of 'what is good for bitshares' is.. 'fuck bitshares worker'.
I seem to be the only one here actually operating on what alt really says, and what little anti-dilution rational we have seen, while a few others want to stick flowers and daisys in that steaming pile and say it smells like sunshine lollipops and rainbows everywhere.
You and
@Bhuz seem to think this is just me taking some kind of position just because I don't agree. I am standing by everyone else who has made numerous attempts to get a reasoning discussion on the matter and failed.
If this is all about the 'good of bitshares'... where is Yunbi?
Shouldn't they be concerned about this thread and their reputation if they really cared?
Don't they want to share with us their reasoning so that perhaps others could be influenced and take their position as well?
Seriously lets stick to the facts of the matter.
When are we going to see a PR release from Yunbi that states clearly they have changed their policies and will start using their wallet to vote and manipulate Bitshares without their users consent? I can tell you when, never.