1
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Signed up as artist
« on: May 05, 2016, 01:44:21 am »
yes, this is something need to be addressed... any plan? @cob
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hi Cob and all,
Our second witness is now up and running, please vote for us. Thanks.
delegate-guazi is hosted on a machine located in Shenzhen.
@cobGuazi would like your votes.
We're a group of Chinese people who have been involved with bitshares from the very beginnings of protoshares. The idea of Peertracks really inspire us, we believe this project is going to be a game changer. Chinese people may not be the largest source of user of Peertracks, but we're definitely the largest source of investment of Muse, now and also in the future.
As of today, we hold more than 5% of the total supply of Muse. To show our support of the Muse project, we'd like to be a witness of the Muse network. Follow on, we'd like to set up more witnesses in mainland China (Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen) and Hongkong to secure the Muse network.
delegate-now is the first, it's running and dedicated, please vote. Thanks.
@cobCode: [Select]get_witness delegate-now
{
"id": "1.6.29",
"witness_account": "1.2.1494",
"last_aslot": 0,
"signing_key": "MUSE6SXBZz2wfKbzDqWZQg37EznFETTTbSCB54KneWcgDZSxxgWhRv",
"vote_id": "1:39",
"total_votes": "333647702980",
"url": "wwww.now.com",
"total_missed": 0,
"last_confirmed_block_num": 0
}
Guazi would like your votes.
We're a group of Chinese people who have been involved with bitshares from the very beginnings of protoshares. The idea of Peertracks really inspire us, we believe this project is going to be a game changer. Chinese people may not be the largest source of user of Peertracks, but we're definitely the largest source of investment of Muse, now and also in the future.
As of today, we hold more than 5% of the total supply of Muse. To show our support of the Muse project, we'd like to be a witness of the Muse network. Follow on, we'd like to set up more witnesses in mainland China (Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen) and Hongkong to secure the Muse network.
delegate-now is the first, it's running and dedicated, please vote. Thanks.
@cobCode: [Select]get_witness delegate-now
{
"id": "1.6.29",
"witness_account": "1.2.1494",
"last_aslot": 0,
"signing_key": "MUSE6SXBZz2wfKbzDqWZQg37EznFETTTbSCB54KneWcgDZSxxgWhRv",
"vote_id": "1:39",
"total_votes": "333647702980",
"url": "wwww.now.com",
"total_missed": 0,
"last_confirmed_block_num": 0
}
get_witness delegate-now
{
"id": "1.6.29",
"witness_account": "1.2.1494",
"last_aslot": 0,
"signing_key": "MUSE6SXBZz2wfKbzDqWZQg37EznFETTTbSCB54KneWcgDZSxxgWhRv",
"vote_id": "1:39",
"total_votes": "333647702980",
"url": "wwww.now.com",
"total_missed": 0,
"last_confirmed_block_num": 0
}
so much excellent suggestions and you used the worse logo ever! (just my personal opinion)
like this ....Fuck cobCan we get that on a tshirt? I feel a meme brewing.
I didn't like the ferrari comparison. It looks pejorative. Almost as if we're claiming something we can't do. Sounds ironical.
It is the continuation of "original" PTS after 5th.Agreed. Here is another believer.
If any 3rd party developer decides to honor the original Social Contract this will be the snapshoted chain of PTS.
I personally think that the original contract (that wasn't even technically included in bitsharesX) was breached twice.
I think that there are others who agree. So I also believe continuation of PTS chain is necessary.
First I saw bm's proposal I thought ptser were all fucked, but looks like the agser after 228 were fucked more seriously....You got at least 10% each if you count DNS and VOTE, since only the parts allocated to AGS and PTS will be honored. So 7+7+3+3 becomes 10+10.
Not that this isn't a total clusterfuck, but I don't feel like AGS or PTS are the ones who got the bad deal.
what i mean is 3rd Party DACs in the future.
according BM's reply, for example 3rd DACs honor new BTSX 20% instead of AGS&PTS
then AGS before feb.28 get 20%*49.4%=9.88%
AGS after feb.28 get 20%*9.4%=1.88% much less than 10%Code: [Select]new BTSX btsx 80% ags7% pts7% dns3% vote3%
so AGS before feb.28 get =80%*50%(btsx)+7%*100%(ags)+3%*50%(dns)+3%*30%(vote)=49.4%
AGS after feb.28 get =7%*100%(ags)+3%*50%(dns)+3%*30%(vote)=9.4%
Yes, that is my opinion also... the party that got the short side of the deal are the After 28th AGS donors [and people that donated more after than before 28th].
I am not complaining, I also understand why it was done [long form explanation in previous post of mine], but in short to make as much as possible # of people happy BM cut the stakes for himself and I3...If you have similar position as his, you get a slightly 'unfair' distribution, but unfair only compared to other positions, not unfair in general.
0.02BTSX
i said it in differnt places too. this merger is in total favor of BTSX donors or before Feb. 28.
this is the reason why i am feeling i get robbed in blank daylight
no one seems to consider that BTSX is allocated from Feb. 28 Snapshot. This Snapshot will get 80% of the new merged chain. I don't understand it. This is toally wrong. If you want not change the allocation you should exclude AGS donors from this 7% and grand all the new shares to donors after the snapshot. Should be more fair. But it seems most of the people are fine to loose the promise.
This is a problem who will need fixes. In PTS you accepted smaller share allocation for the benefit of liquidity, but now AGS is much more fucked then PTS owners, if they donated after Feb. 28
Thanks to say it in better words.