As a developer and AGS investor I have a very simple question: shouldn't the investors in AGS have the say on what DAC proposals get funded?
If Invictus makes all these decisions, isn't this like saying invictus team are smarter in picking up winners than the combined wisdom of all investors?
That said as a developer I don't see an incentive to give away 20% other than the fact that I am also vested in AGS.
And yes good luck!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Absolutely! We value all inputs - then it's our job to figure out an optimized solution.
Read our newsletter Shark Tank proposal. You'll see several ways where we ask AGS members have a say. They get to evaluate and comment on all published proposals. They get to support the ones they like angel-style. They get to attend the conference and ask questions of the finalists directly.
Obviously we can't implement everyone's conflicting opinions, so we use our judgement.
We think about this stuff 24x7. That's what the AGS community hired us to do when we offered to serve as their lead developer. We consider many, many factors and plan for the long term as discussed here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=3394.msg42988#msg42988Naturally, we are not infallible, but collectively we do spend about 100 man-hours a day more than the average forum member thinking about all the ramifications.
In the end, somebody has to make the call. That's why ship captains are hired and why they don't ask the passengers and crew to vote on every command decision.
That doesn't mean we aren't listening.