Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - abc123

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
17
@abc123,
Any changes for SM 3.0 Nvidia cards like the 770? If not, do you think there will be any more significant performance increases for these cards?
There is no changes for Nvidia cards in version 0.4b and 0.4c.
I haven't tested my miner on GTX 770 till now. It is GTX 660 on my computer for develop, which is also SM 3.0.
I don't think more significant performance increases can be made on GTX 660, unless defects in PTS proof of work
algorithm dicovered. 10~20% performance increases may be possible, but needs a lot of work.

Hello.
I using you new miner for my geat miner rig on AMD videocards.
6 GPUS: Radeon 7970+7870+5850+5850+5850+5850.
And i get from all videocards only 3200 collisions\minute.  :(
But When i using this miner: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2410.0
i  received from five videocard 4000 collisions  (miner on 6st the card didn't manage to start).
    Please use version 0.4c released minutes ago. Version 0.4b is not optimized for AMD cards
other than Southern Islands (HD 7xxx) series with 2GB or more video memory.
    Version 0.4c is optimized and can be run on Evergreen (HD5xxx) series and later.

How can I run this miner on Ubuntu ? ???
No. It is for Windows only till now.

hi abc123, 1gh?
Still not supported. 1gh use a different version of xpt protocol.

Hi abc123, will be any performance improvement for Cuda? We all know AMD is much much faster. :-(
"AMD will is much much faster" is not true for SHA512, it is true for SHA256 and scrypt.
I don't think more significant performance increases can be made on GTX 660.
10~20% performance increases may be possible, but needs a lot of work.
Greate performance improvement for Tesla etc may be possible, or may not. But Tesla card is very expensive,
and whether the performance can be improved is uncertain, so I have not made decision to buy one.

18
PtsGPUz v0.4c now released.
Main change log:
PtsGPUz v0.4c (2014-02-14):
MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4c.exe: e9a4a89c7348e2d7619c7bf39efe83d8
1. The performance of AMD cards other than Southern Islands (HD 7xxx) series
  with 2GB or more video memory increased greatly. In other words, the
  performance of AMD HD7xxx series cards with 1GB video memory and all HD6xxx
  series cards with 1GB or more video memory increased greatly.

Net performance list for AMD cards at default frequency, using driver "amd_catalyst_14.1_betav1.6.exe":
HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 840 collisions/minute;
HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 1GB: 720 collisions/minute;
HD6670, 480SP,  128bit, 1GB: 380 collisions/minute.

19
PtsGPUz v0.4b now released.
Main change log:
PtsGPUz v0.4b (2014-02-11):
MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4b.exe: 486f4d653aae492c8300dd5a06552753
1. Performance increased for AMD Southern Islands (HD 7xxx) Series display card.
Net performance for AMD card at default frequency:
HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 770-810 collisions/minute.
HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB:  150-170 collisions/minute.
Note: For AMD Southern Islands Series display card with 1GB video memory,
the performance will be much poorer than 2GB's.

20
Why im connected on pts.rPool.net when i mining on ypool ?
  Miner fee (develpoer fee) is 5%, it is send to ypool.net and one of pts.rpool.net or ptspool.com randomly.
User can change the address if the pool's port has been changed or pool has been shutdown etc,
but I can't as the pool's address is hard-coded in my miner...
So there are two connections for develpoer, together 5%, it is the initial design which is designed in hurry,
although now I think 3 minutes each hour for developer maybe more appropriate.

Hi, abc123
I am using GTX 690 for pts. I reported one issue here by my experience. The 0.3c and 0.4 version could not work properly for GTX690 which based on what I found, the 2nd GPU only has 700 Mb RAM occupied, while 0.3b version works properly, i.e., both GPUs take 1.2-1.3 Gb ram and give me 2100 cpm.
I am here just wondering if you have chance to optimize the performance like GTX 690 (I believe 590 should face same issue) which has 2 GPUs on one board. It will be appreciated.
Thanks for your report.

hi abc123, i get one problem that  the miner runs on  Win8.1 64bit   physical machine with hyper-v service, and  it shows an error "sorry, this application cannot run under a virtual machine "   why?
Thanks for your report. This may due to the wrong setting when I pack the miner, I am sorry for this. Try PtsGPUz v0.3b before new version release.

21
Hello, i have try your miner and i see your minner connect on 54.238.185.113, i want to know what is this connexion please. Thank you.
It is pts.rPool.net

22
Thank you abc123 ;)
So I think I 've minig in the wind..! Because I have no account yet.
Concretely (because I haven't found a PTS minig profitability calculator!) if I mine now at ~ 10.000cpm, how can I hoped PTS per day?
Also, it is more profitable to mine in pool or solo?
Thank you for all! Regards
http://mrx.im/pts.php?cpm=10000
At 10,000 cpm, in yPool.net, you will get 3.7487*0.95=3.56 (PTS per day).
Note: 10,000 cpm means that you are running 12.5x Nvidia Geforce GTX 660.

Could anyone tells me that is this Miner Able to mine coins like MMC MTC XPM?
No, it is for PTS only just now.

23
Any news?
The same problem appears when I run CPU miner jhProtoming 0.1e. So it may because the compatibility between xpt versions.

hi, i have AMD Radeon HD7870 with 2GB memory
why dispaly "fails on allocate memory "
Strange. Is your main memory >=2GB ?  Page file >=4GB ?

  Hi everybody, I'm a full newbie and I just started in the mining...
  But I've tested the Miner on my 2x GTX580 system. It work very fine (around 2300-2400 cpm), thank you!
But now, I don't know exactly how to have a proof or verification of the mined PTS. Where can I see it?
Is it only at the end of the block? So after the ~47000 shares created?
  I would appreciate you tell me a little more ... thank you very much!
  You can see it when you longin in yPool.net.
  Or click Stats in pts.rPool.net, click the newest block, then you can find your address and balance in that page.
  Or find your address at ptspool.com, wait 6 hours and check you wallet.

24
my gtx 780 went from 1750 collisions/m (OC) to 1400 with new version
was thinking it may be a RAM issue so i put in 2 more GB, so it has 4 GB now.. still same thing
The performance of GTX 780 on version 0.4 and version 0.3c shoud be no difference.  Use old version if you found the performance of newer version is lower.

share  invalid : data time overflow  <---- this is the error. Please help  .using 7970 win os 7.0 64bit
This meas that your system time is incorrect.

25
Hi abc123!
Does your miner support pts.1gh.com? they added xpt protocol.
Not supported now, it will prompt: "Invalid share, Reason: unknown-work" after a short run at pts.1gh.com.
Which version of jhProtominer did you take as a base for your miner? Or, about what date did you check it out from github?
Based on jhProtominer v0.1e, 2013-11-23.

26
Hi abc123!
Does your miner support pts.1gh.com? they added xpt protocol.
Not supported now, it will prompt: "Invalid share, Reason: unknown-work" after a short run at pts.1gh.com.

27
PtsGPUz v0.4 now released.
Main change log:
PtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):
MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf0
1. Supports to AMD display card added.
2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.
3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.
Net performance list for AMD cards:
HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.
HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB:  100-110 collisions/minute.

28
I think 0.3c is not optimized for gtx780ti
with gtx760, arCUDAminer 1.0c can get less than 1000 cpm, while ptsGPU0.3c can get 1100+
with gtx780ti, arCUDAminer 1.0c can get 1900+ cpm, but ptsGPU can only get about 1720 cpm.
will you check this, @abc123?
SM 3.5 code generation will be added in next version. This may increase the exe file size.

abc123  Can you modify the miner to auto restart when it’s display cudaMemcpy failed, before this ploblem is solved?
it's ASUS ENGTX580 DCII/2DIS/1536MD5        1.5G
dirver vision 332.21
WIN7    X64 whith sp1
PtsGPUz0.3c has been tested on ASUS ENGTX580 DCII/2DIS/1536MD5 1.5G, dirver vision 331.82, Win7 x64 SP1 for hours. No cudaMemcpy failed occor.
The performance is ~1125 collisions/min. Have you overclocked your card? Does the power supplier powerful enough? Does the temperature of GPU core in normal range?

29
abc123, below is the output for mining on the m2090. Normally I run without the "-t" and "-d" flag, but I have another nvidia GPU so I wanted to isolate the tesla card. Is there anything I can do to help diagnose the m2090 speed?
Thank you again.

abc123  Can you modify the miner to auto restart when it’s display cudaMemcpy failed, before this ploblem is solved?
What version of GTX 580 do you use? Video memory size?

30
I know of one issue for sure. My m2090 has 5375 MB of ram, but the miner only detects 4GB. Furthermore, nvidia-smi reports that the miner only actually uses 572 MB of the video card ram.
Does that help ABC123?
The memory usage is designed 500~600MB in card with compute capability 2.0. To use more memory on my GTX 480 can't increase performance. The reason why Tesla m2090 only gets half of the anticipated performance remains unknown. Thank you.

me either, 2 gpu on 1 graphics card is very slow because the 2 gpu switch load very frequently, total work load is very low
Thank you, guobacoo and badfox, for report the performance of double GPU on one card may be very low.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4