Quote from: binggo on August 09, 2018, 10:58:15 am

lochaling说的也不无道理，因为充值费率相对于内盘价格的反应是滞后的，这个滞后的时间段就会带来内盘的价格大幅下滑。

一般的流程：外盘价格下滑---外盘喂价下滑--爆仓单--爆仓价格压制--内外盘价差形成--搬砖时间段---充值费率形成。

如果内盘价格做喂价，我认为需要一个加权系数，这个系数的调整要爆仓单形成就要生效或者与内外盘价格形成价差时就要生效。

我以前提过内外盘价格比较法，谁高就用谁的，但是abit说会形成抵押溢出，额，想想也并非全无道理，可能需要一个基础抵押率来防止抵押溢出。

target CR被广泛使用之后，可以认为已经没有爆仓价格压制的问题了。

还有，抵押溢出是什么鬼？

Quote from: Thul3 on August 07, 2018, 10:20:12 pm

Am requesting to all commitee members to remove bitcrab from the committee controlled open market operation fund.
Its a clear conflict of interrest and also the unnatural buy wall which is exectly near bitcrabs margin which is causing unnatural prices on DEX can't be tollarated anymore on a free market which DEX should be.
Today we saw a feed price of 1.06 but BTS price on DEX kept up on 1,084 and never moving down because of the big buy walls for 1 million BTS at 1.08 ,1.07 ,1.06 ,1.05 ,1.03  .
The fund should be used to buy BTS and not to create heavy buy walls which are not going to break.
Also why are the funds at bottom prices on the buy walls if he really wants to buy BTS ?


Thats a massiv abuse and also cheat on all traders who shorten BTS on a bear market to protect a persons own interrest.
No new bitasset was created so you can't tell us it was created to increase liquidity.

Also i'm very disappointed once again from all commitee members who let it happen

yes, the current ratio is a little lower, and when the new funds come, it will be used to increase the ratio.

but I do not agree that the buying wall are cheating and abuse.

what role will Bitshares play in the future? in my view it is "World Central Bank", to play this role we need to stabilize the market and increase the liquidity of the smartcoin, that's why I suggest to create the OMO.

frankly speaking, one of my purpose is to make BTS price above 6 CNY and never go down in half a year.

I hurt who shorten BTS on a bear market to protect a persons own interrest? maybe. why should OMO protect a person's interest who shorten BTS?

I had do many things, for example one is to increase the force settlement ratio to 1% or even more, this definitely will help the smartcoin generator but won't do good to a BTS shorter. to help the ecosystem to grow definitely we need to encourage the constructor of the ecosystem.

several days ago I had expected that the BTS price will be never go down to under 1CNY, but unfortunately it goes again, but in my watching, the key point is that several big debt positions, including mine, do not use the target collateral ratio feature, and that because the GUI that support the target CR feature do not come until several hours ago.

this give the speculator chance to short BTS and make BTS price go down, what we need to remove is the chance that shorters can use. please use the target CR ratio feature.