1
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 免费派送DOGECOIN资产,排好队,别抢留言的都有份。。。
« on: March 01, 2015, 09:24:23 am »
yoo-pupu
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Why should KeyID blockchain be turned off? Lets keep it on.
Why we need additional chain if all KeyID functionality will be integrated into BTS?
Maybe you don't need it, but why kill a live and trading network? It may have a future of its own. Anyway I am going to give it a chance to live.
Setting up a new testnet for post merger KeyID now.
I didn't betray anyone... I have many friends and family that are AGS holders post Feb 28... I am a large ags holder Post Feb 28.
AGS was a gift... no strings attached. Anyone who has AGS and is complaining has no one they can blame but themselves for setting wrong expectations.
We said we would recommend AGS/PTS get 10% each of *FUTURE* DACs built using the toolkit. Congrats, you got 10% of *PAST* dacs as well.
I was and I'm still mostly concerned about the bolded text:
4.The genesis block of any blockchain must allocate 10% of the total lifetime shares ever allocated by the blockchain to the holders of BitShares PTS proportional to the percentage of total BitShares PTS held. Additionally 10% of the total lifetime shares ever allcoated by the blockchain to the holders of BitShares AGS must be allocated in the genesis block.
I was trying to explain this in so many posts that you might think I'm a spammer. I'm not that concerned about BTS ownership of PTS/AGS. I'm concerned about the failure to fulfill that non-binding promise-like thingy. I think post feb28 AGS/PTS holders have the right to feel lied to and whine about that.
Actually I've said too much already given the fact my stake is really tiny. I'll not make this specific topic any harder for you.
欢迎竞争,你说得很轻松,你去开发一个DNS,要分股份给AGS、PTS。跟我的想法一样,BM抛出这个想法的前几天我就在想:要是其它DAC一样发行USD,一样的铆钉,那要BTSX干什么,DNS要USD有USD要应用有应用,谁的应用广泛谁的USD就有话语权,如今BTSX要统一这个话语权才能够产生很多这些应用的叠加效应,而不是因为DAC的应用而产生分化效应。+5%。
总之一句话,“发展壮大BTSX的核心思想是不会变的”,要拆迁总是有些钉子户,但是假设发展壮大的是今后的VOTE或者重新搞一个BTS,更加伤筋动骨!
从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk
bm自己也说了欢迎竞争,那USD好用,MUSIC,DNS要用,为何还怕别人别人强大开发一个USD2呢
你无可避免未来有其他dac,功能有重叠
没竞争,bm更肆无忌惮改你的“共识了”
做好之后BM不废吹灰之力在BTSX中fork你的DNS,想到这一点,你还有动力去研发么?
再假设具体一点,假如你是个投资者,现在小面包不同意整合,要出来单干。BM没办法,在X中集成他的DNS,你愿意投资BM还是面包?
从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk
跟我的想法一样,BM抛出这个想法的前几天我就在想:要是其它DAC一样发行USD,一样的铆钉,那要BTSX干什么,DNS要USD有USD要应用有应用,谁的应用广泛谁的USD就有话语权,如今BTSX要统一这个话语权才能够产生很多这些应用的叠加效应,而不是因为DAC的应用而产生分化效应。+5%。
总之一句话,“发展壮大BTSX的核心思想是不会变的”,要拆迁总是有些钉子户,但是假设发展壮大的是今后的VOTE或者重新搞一个BTS,更加伤筋动骨!
从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk