Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The objective is to achieve adoption and they are limited by their own chain so. I guess unless transaction speeds or some other big feature comes up, their "bitAssets" are condemned to fail since day 1. I don't like being so radical but honestly I just can't see any other possible outcome at the moment, with their chain specs and technology
Winners will:
1 Enable decentralized peer-to-peer systems that allow for very low cost, privacy and long term sustainability in exchange for less direct control of data
2 Prepare for highly efficient, real-time digital marketplaces built on physical assets and services with new measures of credit and risk
3 Design for meaningful user experiences, rather than try to build large ecosystems or complex network solutions.
Losers will:
1 Continue to invest in and support high-cost infrastructure, and be unmindful of security and privacy that can lead to decades of balance sheet overhead
2 Fight for control of ecosystems and data, even when they have no measure of what its value will be
3 Attempt to build ecosystems but lose sight of the value created, probably slowing adoption and limiting the usage of their solutions.
That sounds like I would just have the problem?This issue can be fixed with a GUI update, but unfortunately most people are on 0.4.27.1 which means their client will crash with the new update format. Perhaps we can make a 0.4.27.3 release with this fix in it.Would this fix this https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=12519.msg166051#msg166051 ?
Yep!
We could do something tricky like enable the update very briefly so that you could update and then disable it again, if you have a big enough stake to make the vote worthwhile.
Disable the update again, how would that work?
Not if you upgrade to 0.4.27.2
And it's simple, we put the update up, you update, we take it back down so nobody else sees an update.
The idea of having a manual gateway until we get a real one is actually quite appealing. Bitcoin transactions take 1 hour anyway so it won't have to be constantly monitored and executed.
you cannot steal IOUs or bitAssets from a gateway because the gateway has "superadmin" powers over their IOUs ON-THE-CHAIN(!!!) and processes the order books to bitassets ... so if someone manages to "steal" IOUs the gateway just freezes them or reverts them but simply does not process orders from that account ... thus the IOUs are stuck and worth nothing ...
furthermore the gateway knows exactly WHO owns HOW many IOUs and is the only instance that can process the orderbook to bitassets .. from that point on it's YOUR job to secure the funds ..
IMHO this is huge and most people don't get it!
I think, we don't want to give each a on-line BTS trading exchange set up pay100% Delegate? This is a very stupid idea
Or again, we will give every claim to promote BTS people set up pay100% Delegate? I saw a lot of fraud in the staged
We can form a kind of atmosphere, to establish pay100% Delegate, register and open you are going to do, when after your success or achievement, and then ask you to vote
Also, the BM community share voting right, should not easily use, after must wait for community voting ends, and then consider whether it is necessary to vote, and vote should have a half-life
I'm against almost all of the pay100% Delegate, including BM
here is the link for the information
http://dacx.com/Play/index_en.html
