Quote from: xeroc on September 02, 2019, 08:37:56 am

Quote from: bitcrab on September 02, 2019, 02:24:33 am

however, I don't think it's very difficult to find skilled enough developers to do the core dev job.

Uff, have you ever looked into *their* job?
Since I am in a closed telegram group with the core dev team, I can tell you, it's *WAY* over my head ... and I'd call myself well-educated.

OK，maybe I was wrong.

It's going to be exceedingly difficult and expensive to replace the development capabilities lost due to refund400k. It's concerning that you're unaware of what you're blocking & the subsequent future consequences that burning these bridges will result in.

Quote from: bench on September 02, 2019, 01:04:13 am

At the moment the onboarding.bitshares.foundation takes 15% as registrar.
To stay competitive with OpenLedger the registrar should also be set to 0%.

Registrar cut was introduced to cover costs for signup, but with low signup costs and new referral system(market fee share), this is not needed anymore.

Network onboarding.bitshares.foundation should be the best competing faucet since it's backed by bitshares worker, OL is using his 0% faucet's feature to gain more voting power while advertising his faucet to be competing with the network's official faucet.

The faucet worker proposal has been blocked by refund400k, it may eventually stop working and new users will be impeded from joining.

RE Changing the fee taken, why not propose changing the redistribution of fees from 80:20 so that the network gets more? Problem solved, can remove refund400k vote.

this solution may increase the possibility of a black swan event

Global Settlement*. Since BSIP18 the black swan scenario has solutions, thus this term is outdated.

I'm sorry to see the conference being cancelled due to refund400k voters, this is quite unfortunate.

Quote from: Customminer on August 28, 2019, 06:36:04 pm

Bump. Still looking for further price feed publishers & market participants 👍

You should set up a market fee and share it to price feed publisher!

Market fee permission is permanently disabled.

agree

disagree

NABTS2019

Was an upcoming dedicated Bitshares conference in North America; its deactivation is a major loss for Bitshares marketing opportunity.

DEXBot WP3 - Liquidity for the DEX

Highly active community worker proposal for developing an open source trading bot for Bitshares; this worker is highly beneficial to the Bitshares liquidity and market bootstrapping. There are no equal featured alternative Bitshares trading bots.

201907-steemfest

Promoting Bitshares at Steemfest - an soon to be lost opportunity to market Bitshares to new users.

201902-reference-faucet

Without this new users would be unable to register on the Bitshares network. How don't you know this? Are you using an alternative? There's no actively maintained alternative registration faucets, blocking this would deter new users from Bitshares.

2019-06-decentralized-partnership

A soon to be lost marketing opportunity for Bitshares.

By blocking decentralized, steemfest & nabts2019 worker proposals you disregard marketing/advertising across America, Europe, Middle east & Africa entirely.

201902-infrastructure

Required so that web wallets have servers to connect to. By attacking this WP you threaten the Bitshares infrastructure for us all.

Who are you? Why apply for such a huge expense?

Most of the worker proposals are highly transparent and you can find this information out if you were to do some digging.

These expenses are fair market rates for highly specialist contract developers, if you can undercut the existing dev worker proposals then do submit one else this is empty complaining.

Is it really necessary for you to exist?

Yes, very.

Why don't you tell us what's going on and what's going on?

The three marketing/conference workers are for events in the future, they can't provide you information on content which does not yet exist. You can find out more info on steemfest & decentralized by visiting their dedicated websites & the nabts wp you could have asked in its dedicated 'stakeholder proposal' thread.

The infrastructure and faucet workers don't provide constant update reports because they're passively operational software stacks for maintaining the operational state of the Bitshares network.

Who's to say you're not corrupt?

Unless you've got clear evidence of corruption, don't make accusations of bad faith. Most of the above worker proposals are highly transparent. From my perspective you're attacking the Bitshares network with this fraudulent narrative.