361
General Discussion / Re: Pump100k
« on: September 01, 2019, 11:08:18 pm »
Why focus solely on bitCNY? Why not the norns given the reduction in risk?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
363
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Announcement of cn-vote Union: Re-evaluation of our support of Worker Proposals
« on: August 31, 2019, 11:10:44 pm »Same logic, don't the BTS holders from China understand what sense can workers like wirex make?
Whilst Wirex wouldn't immediately be available in China, but by enhancing the Bitshares ecosystem in US, EMEA & soon SEA, the holders from China will benefit.
in my view, when BTS price is under 0.3CNY or there are margin call orders in CNY/USD markets, any big workers should be stopped immediately.
Indiscriminately stopping all workers may damage the Bitshares network. Reputation & Brand has already been inflicted by refund400k due to the conferences being at-risk/cancelled. One could theorize that the recent price drops are influenced by refund400k, the opposite of the intended effect.
364
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] North American BitShares Conference + WCC DEVCON |Updated 7/10
« on: August 31, 2019, 10:38:07 pm »
I'm sorry to see the conference being cancelled due to refund400k voters, this is quite unfortunate.
365
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Seeking price feed publishers for the Norns (Urthr, Verthandi & Skuld)
« on: August 31, 2019, 10:32:11 pm »Why ?Market fee permission is permanently disabled.Bump. Still looking for further price feed publishers & market participants 👍You should set up a market fee and share it to price feed publisher!
The market fee permission was disabled for the Norns to reduce potential regulatory hurdles/issues.
Other users on the Bitshares platform are welcome to create their own alternative algorithm based assets with market fees enabled, using the existing Norn price feed scripts (MIT licensed).
The network will still earn fees from any Norn related operations on the bitshares platform.
I've not had any direct feedback from potential price feed publishers regarding fees prohibiting their price feed publishing participation, they're one of the cheapest operations on the network. I've created 6M+ price feed operations on the bitshares network so far for hertz & the norns.
366
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Seeking price feed publishers for the Norns (Urthr, Verthandi & Skuld)
« on: August 29, 2019, 09:29:33 pm »Market fee permission is permanently disabled.Bump. Still looking for further price feed publishers & market participants 👍You should set up a market fee and share it to price feed publisher!
367
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Seeking price feed publishers for the Norns (Urthr, Verthandi & Skuld)
« on: August 28, 2019, 06:36:04 pm »
Bump. Still looking for further price feed publishers & market participants 👍
368
General Discussion / Re: Best Way To Secure BTS In 2019?
« on: August 28, 2019, 04:08:57 pm »agreedisagree
369
General Discussion / Re: Huge spending will lead to the collapse of BTS
« on: August 28, 2019, 04:05:54 pm »Heck no. Look: https://hackthedex.io/#/reportsQuoteIf the hackthedex & ui worker proposals hadn't existed then the security of BTS would be in a worse state.
Wasn't the reported issues only low security issues ?
Nobody should be using a client version older than a few months ago, fact.
370
General Discussion / Re: these worker，who are U？
« on: August 28, 2019, 04:03:11 pm »NABTS2019
Was an upcoming dedicated Bitshares conference in North America; its deactivation is a major loss for Bitshares marketing opportunity.
DEXBot WP3 - Liquidity for the DEX
Highly active community worker proposal for developing an open source trading bot for Bitshares; this worker is highly beneficial to the Bitshares liquidity and market bootstrapping. There are no equal featured alternative Bitshares trading bots.
201907-steemfest
Promoting Bitshares at Steemfest - an soon to be lost opportunity to market Bitshares to new users.
201902-reference-faucet
Without this new users would be unable to register on the Bitshares network. How don't you know this? Are you using an alternative? There's no actively maintained alternative registration faucets, blocking this would deter new users from Bitshares.
2019-06-decentralized-partnership
A soon to be lost marketing opportunity for Bitshares.
By blocking decentralized, steemfest & nabts2019 worker proposals you disregard marketing/advertising across America, Europe, Middle east & Africa entirely.
201902-infrastructure
Required so that web wallets have servers to connect to. By attacking this WP you threaten the Bitshares infrastructure for us all.
Who are you? Why apply for such a huge expense?
Most of the worker proposals are highly transparent and you can find this information out if you were to do some digging.
These expenses are fair market rates for highly specialist contract developers, if you can undercut the existing dev worker proposals then do submit one else this is empty complaining.
Is it really necessary for you to exist?
Yes, very.
Why don't you tell us what's going on and what's going on?
The three marketing/conference workers are for events in the future, they can't provide you information on content which does not yet exist. You can find out more info on steemfest & decentralized by visiting their dedicated websites & the nabts wp you could have asked in its dedicated 'stakeholder proposal' thread.
The infrastructure and faucet workers don't provide constant update reports because they're passively operational software stacks for maintaining the operational state of the Bitshares network.
Who's to say you're not corrupt?Unless you've got clear evidence of corruption, don't make accusations of bad faith. Most of the above worker proposals are highly transparent. From my perspective you're attacking the Bitshares network with this fraudulent narrative.
371
General Discussion / Re: Huge spending will lead to the collapse of BTS
« on: August 28, 2019, 03:43:56 pm »From my personal experience, I've found that the core & UI development worker proposals are excellent value for money
What is ROI of those investments? Nobody argues they brought some value, but have they returned the money invested?
Their purpose isn't a temporary loan, the reserve pool is constantly being topped by by network fees & worker proposals aren't the source of price downtrend.
In terms of the return on money invested, you could consider the absence of stolen user funds certainly as a positive. If the hackthedex & ui worker proposals hadn't existed then the security of BTS would be in a worse state.
Voting for refund400k will cause BTS price depreciation and irrecoverable WP states. Instead request your committee members rebalance the referrer:network fee distribution towards funding the reserve pool if you (illogically) want to grow the reserve pool.
372
General Discussion / Re: Smratcoin GCNY backed by GDEX.BTC
« on: August 28, 2019, 03:38:17 pm »
Would a BSIP request be the most direct method of requesting price feed publisher support from the witnesses for GDEX.BTC? 🤔 Or would that set a bad precedent?
373
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] BitAsset PhD Research project - University of Colorado
« on: August 28, 2019, 12:26:11 am »I believe this WP will be more productive for this purpose; threads on bitsharestalk are usually pretty quiet.This worker proposal could provide new smartcoin setting profiles for multiple theoretical assets & that's valuable information to me and probably others.If you are unsure how to set parameters, you should open a separate topic.
374
General Discussion / Re: Best Way To Secure BTS In 2019?
« on: August 27, 2019, 08:46:43 pm »My suggestion is to stop all stoppable workers by voting until the market recovers, and then resume as appropriate.
Don't vote for refund400k, worker proposals are not the source of BTS' price downtrend & most worker proposals are not feasibly stoppable without causing loss of developer resources/capabilities, loss of investor confidence and loss of marketing opportunities. Austerity has proven to be a failed economic policy, rather than blocking workers out of fear of price uncertainty invest in workers for the future of Bitshares to be more easily realized whilst other platforms stagnate.
375
General Discussion / Re: Smratcoin GCNY backed by GDEX.BTC
« on: August 27, 2019, 08:41:14 pm »You'll have to get GCNY integrated into multiple price feed scripts, otherwise witnesses won't have the tools available to provide feeds (aside from manually via the UI).If it's backed by GDEX.BTC, why don't you run private price feeds too?
how?
There's about 4 or 5 different price feeds you'll need to support for best redundancy, but one or two should be sufficient for a few witnesses to provide price feeds.
You'll need to directly contact prospective price feed publishers, bitsharestalk threads don't attract their attention that effectively lol
