Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 69
376
On the one side 201907-uccs-research-project does create a problem, where there is actually is no problem, but doesn't solve any of our real problems.
The BitShares community is already aware MCR = 1.5 and MSSR = 1.01 is the sweet spot.

A very quick answer: how do you know there is no problem? The community chose the older chain parameters and then crypto winter caused most BitAssets to GS. Since then, you've adjusted the parameters to shift more risk onto BitAsset holders. Why would those new parameters be better?

A question back to you: How do you know that 1.5 and 1.01 are the sweet spot? Why not 1.2 and 1?
If optimal configurations are discovered or BSIPs are proposed from the research then it's totally worth the worker proposal investment. There's quite limited documentation on the effects of smartcoin settings and exotic smartcoins like algorithm based assets.

377
Looking for further price feed publishers for the norns. Perhaps a BSIP would be the best way to get witness feed attention? 😂

378
General Discussion / Re: Allow non-LTM accounts to be referrers?
« on: August 19, 2019, 06:59:26 pm »
Rather than entirely removing the LTM requirement, what about a minimum BTS balance requirement for referral mechanism access?
It still means you need to invest some money before you're possible to earn money. Small marketers won't touch it.
At least 1 BTS would mean they've at least used the platform before they're decided to promote it. Might deter bot sign ups?

379
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Integration of BTS with Wirex
« on: August 19, 2019, 06:37:01 pm »
I hope that this worker proposal will be reactivated, I've got a wirex card now and have been using it across Europe, it's very handy. 👍

380
I hope that your worker proposal can be reactivated soon, I support your research worker proposal 👍

381
Would you consider voting for a smaller refund worker proposal, rather than the refund400k?

I do not believe that austerity works, we aught to be steadily investing in most of the proposed worker proposals.

I'm hoping that we can reactivate the following worker proposals:
* Wirex - Using wirex with BTS would enable me to spend BTS like a normal bank card, it's a great ongoing development for the EMEA Bitshares ecosystem.
* Bitshares UI development - I view this worker proposal as highly productive, improving the reference UI is an excellent investment for the global Bitshares ecosystem. Without this worker proposal, there may be a lack of developers available to resolve new issues reported in the HackTheDex worker proposal.
* Bitshares code development - Very productive worker proposal, multiple releases recently and excellent new functionality being introduced to the network. It would be unfortunate to lose UI or core devs due to loss of funding, we need this development capability to further thwart any issues reported through the HackTheDex wp.
* Conferences - Bitshares is so rarely marketed, these would be an excellent opportunity to get Bitshares some good exposure (worthwhile investment).
* uccs research project - I believe this is highly valuable, it will improve Bitshares academic credibility and I'm confident that its research will lead to new novel assets and optimized bitasset settings for the Bitshares platform.

I do not believe that any of the currently active Bitshares worker proposals are the cause of the downtrend in the Bitshares prices, the worker proposal fund emissions are lower than most other cryptocurrencies.

382
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares at the cross roads
« on: August 17, 2019, 04:44:39 pm »
What's the next rainfalls on staked BTS?

383
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Payger - Payment + Messenger
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:54:38 pm »
Would you be able to add support for SMOKE & RUDEX.SMOKE please? Thanks :)

384
will stakemine support beos in the future?

385
Do you want to control this situation?

Charge fees from the margin call,then he will  become responsebal for his debt.

What % would you recommend?

386
General Discussion / Re: topics to be discussed in Shanghai
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:35:41 pm »
How did these discussions go?

387
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:33:25 pm »
Could you please encourage price feed support for the following assets? Thanks

Hertz, Urthr, Verthandi, Skuld.

https://norns.hertz.network/
https://crypto.fans/hertz/

388
Good to see the conference went well, I'm glad that core devs were able to attend.

389
Great work biophil 👍

Supporting your worker proposal should be a high priority for all 👌

390
General Discussion / Re: Allow non-LTM accounts to be referrers?
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:24:24 pm »
Rather than entirely removing the LTM requirement, what about a minimum BTS balance requirement for referral mechanism access?

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 69