The NSR buyback just bought into my sell orders and gave me profits on all the NSR I bought this week.

So beautiful.


Cant wait for next week.

How about we go back to bitshares 0.9 where we had TITAN and didnt have to pay $45k for privacy features?


Oh by the way, if if the worker proposal passed you wouldnt get $45k out of it.  Try to sell tens of millions more BTS and you'll probably get less than half that because the price will be down under 500 sats.


You know whats doing great?  Nushares.
The are profitable and buying back 20-40btc of NSR per week, which bitshares devs want to get tens of millions of BTS for features that already existed in 1.0 that they took away, so they can dump them and crash the price even more.  Lol!

I just ate some losses and balanced my holdings a bit more towards bitcoin.

This almost certainly means BTC price is about the fall, resulting in BTS/BTC price going up. You heard it here first.

I bought some burst.  No regrets.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1248631.0

This could let you trade directly between BTC, Burst, and Qora on the blockchains.  It works differently than an asset on the Bitshares exchange would, in that you would be trading the underlying coins, rather than derivatives.   

Qora is proof of stake, no inflation.
Burst is proof of capacity, which is an interesting alternative mining algorithm which doesnt burn tons of energy like bitcoin and is based on hard drive storage space.   It is still in an inflationary phase, but it had been beaten down to extremely low levels prior to this news.

I bought 1 BTC in each yesterday when I saw this. 

I wouldnt really say that bitcoin is not ethical, but I would say that it wastes energy and is bad for the environment, which Bitshares fixes.  It has a low transactions per second capacity, which Bitshares fixes.

Also:
Bitshares is a decentralized exchange.

$8-$9 mil if i remember correctly and namecoin was $10-$11 mil.

It briefly peaked at that amount when it hit 450 sats, but it was actually around 200 prior to the merger announcement which was about 3-4M.

Alright, regarding #2, it looks like the problem is that assets are not covered under the change? 


I think adding a small %age fee like centralized exchanges use, for BTS trades, is a great step forward.

Could we also implement this for assets?  Is there a technical reason why we cannot do this, or another reason?


Centralized exchanges had a 0.2% trading fee on the BTC side of the trad,e but also a 0.2% fee on the altcoin side.  Doesnt it make sense to emulate this and do the same for our markets, for BTS fees and asset fees?  And then apply the referral program to these percentage fees on asset trades as well?


Currently there are no percentage fees, so adding them for BTS trades is a step forward.  But wouldnt adding them for both BTS trades AND for asset trades be TWO steps forward?  If this is a harder change, I think it would still be worth paying more for, unless for some reason it is incredibly hard or impossible.


Lets emulate poloniex/bitfinex/etc.  0.2% fee for both BTS trades and asset trades.  0.1 BTS flat fee on trades because we have to have something to prevent spam, but this is low enough to not annoy anyone.

We have retracted #1.

To those in this thread that says the community always just rubber stamps everything, this is evidence that we dont just rubber stamp everything.


Are there any issues with any of the other proposals that we need to discuss more? 
Things definitely seem to go best when we have a dialogue between devs and community and everyone works to refine and improve each others ideas.