286
General Discussion / Re: Stealth token?
« on: November 03, 2017, 10:33:56 pm »
stealth is a UIA, so better ask the issuer
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Nice catch @fav
Is there any way to find out approximately how long this has been happening, and how many referred users were sent?
btsfav commented 18 minutes ago
bitshares.org/wallet referral doesn't work either, are you guys kidding me?
@svk31 @wmbutler this is not acceptable, please test this stuff first before you change. ALL ref links are worthless now.
btsfav commented 13 minutes ago
Who made the decision to ninja change the default registrar faucet (which is not even working) and why?
Let me remind you that openledger offers tons of access nodes, they fully deserve to be the default faucet.
also, I HOPE whoever made this decision checked with bitshares.eu that they disable the "default proxy" setting, or else you'll commit to voter bias in the reference client.
you're 3 years too late for this, no need to waste time on this now
if you have money in a blockchain your history is open.
https://getmonero.org/Quote from: oxarbitragein bitshares the account history is already open to everyone that want to look. the plugin does not do anything than what it is already possible with current api calls. where is the problem with the plugin ? i still don't get it.
The account history should have never been open for everyone to see. It is something that I believe bytemaster greatly overlooked in the 2.0 design, in the rush to get the (vastly superior, except for some details, such as this one - unfortunately, a major oversight, in my opinion) graphene technology online in the form of Bitshares 2.0.
People are not that stupid, or at least I hope so - with bitcoin and other such coins (essentially 99.999% of the stuff out there) the concept of addresses makes the uninitiated believe that the thing is modestly private (turns out, that's not really true).
With an account name (good idea), however, without privacy (bad idea), people easily and viscerally realize that they are naked, and very few people would want the whole world to know everything about their financial history.
And why must it be on by default, the private transactions? Well, simple, if privacy is opt-in, the anonymity set is that much smaller, private transactions stuck out, rather than blending in.
Once again, the monero guys got it right. We would do well to learn from them.
The potential for BTS is so huge, but without privacy, it's doomed. Nobody in their right mind wants to broadcast their whole financial life to the whole internet to see.
QuoteI have also signed two NDAs, but I'm not going to disclose with whom or on what terms, they're called non-disclosure for a reason, you know
This is right. It is strange that some people don't get this.
If this is a problem, we could require candidates for committee/witness positions to sign an agreement not to make any NDAs in the future, however, this could create more pita than we want.
and it's still nothing they can work on right now.
Not a fact.
Current Bitshares functionality will need to be implemented as an EOS native smart contract. This work can start now.