106
General Discussion / Re: Emphasis should be on UIAs, not SmartCoins (at this initial stage)
« on: November 21, 2015, 04:51:25 pm »
I am too getting to this conclusion but for a different market than the financial system.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The wallet is looking great. Will there be any explainer videos created to help with the user experience?
@TravelsAsia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UovFeiqnrs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQA9Ccg1KWI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akzNFUn2l1o
Bought some obits on market. Waiting for buy back. Please make me happy.
@kuro112 maybe I was thinking wrong about the withdrawal code. I was assuming it was a one use code. Is the withdrawal code reusable? So I can create as many tip links as I want using one code each day?
If we keep going we will have to create a pair HIGHFIVE:FISTBUMP ;-)
Which one would have more value than the other?
#btstip "rgcrypto" 1 GREATIDEA
@kuro112 maybe I was thinking wrong about the withdrawal code. I was assuming it was a one use code. Is the withdrawal code reusable? So I can create as many tip links as I want using one code each day?
I really really want a bond market. I am just trying to estimate the relative complexity of various tasks.
Since 2014 Q4 (when the dev team ran out of money), CNX owes us nothing. Just get used to it.
CNX is free to make worker proposals whatever they like (including fixing bugs) and we are free to accept them or reject them.
If a coder is unwilling to take responsibility for his bugs, he only risks his reputation.
CNX is not doing us a favor - they are just taking care of their reputation.
They said they would fix the bug so there is no issue.
And if we continue with this "attitude of entitlement" - we risk our reputation (as a community).