The way I understand it a user issued asset has it's supply decided by the issuer. In most cases it seems they just set the supply equal to the maximum from the start. Unless there's a burn of funds through transactions or deliberate action, that supply will then just stay constant.
I've catch. Yeah you right. No need to show in absolute. Only percentages that show the structure of shareholders.
I haven't really considering issuing an asset no, because as it stands I don't really see the utility. If they end up becoming useful I'll be happy to reconsider though.
Utility could be tremendous. I am looking how NXT ecosystem emerge. It happens only because participants accept build in assets as efficient way to manage domain level projects and products. If you domain project have asset so you can from day 1:
- Measure your effort through capitalization in addition to votes.
- Make deals with partners by simple exchanging assets (simple case - links to partnership sites without need to manage all this referral staff)
- Attract investments to your project. In case you build efficient funnel you'll have competitive advantage as delegate: you don't need low payoff rate.
- Motivate your teammates for result.
- Build bounty program almost for free.
And muuuch more.... The most excited thing that it is easy and cheap. And you'll be the first inside BitShares ecosystem who use UIA for infrastructure project. That is opportunity and experiment that cost nothing and has no risks at all. Common!!! I'll appreciate fucking 500 BTS for this experiment!!
For example we can exchange some BTSBLCKS for CSHARES and will have additional benefits from helping each other effectively creating value....