Just wanted to chime in here. I would say I've been a fairly consistent member and have had many wonderful chats and made great connections on this community. I think that the community is the strength of this project. With that said, I think one of the biggest problems that has come about with the cryptonomex/bitshares 2.0 move is the lack of transparency in demands for usage of the code. In the previous version, we knew the unspoken rule was 20% (because it was said that you would be outright ostracized from the community if you didn't sharedrop). I always have liked the idea of sharedropping, but I understand there are numerous ways to get across your means of being able to pay for the services of those who came before. Which is why I have such a problem here. There hasn't been that kind of transparency in terms of demands. Part of this I understand due to the sacrifices (and yes, there were sacrifices made on the dev's end...you'd have to be a fool to not see that). But at what cost? This community has been the driving force behind Bitshares and worked to maintain its relevancy. I think that there should be more efforts put into transparency regarding the license. That's my wishlist item. Other than that, keep doing what you guys are doing. I've been trying to get up to speed with the new code and it is just gorgeous....and the Doxygen file is written very well this time around to the point where I can actually reasonably figure what the hell is going on in the code. All in all, just keep trying for transparency. Everything else will follow. That's my 2 cents. I'm out.