46
General Discussion / Re: Price of BitShares on Dec 25th?
« on: November 26, 2015, 02:14:53 pm »
1980
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
@bytemaster
And what about these tasks:
- A migration solution for the owners of a larger number of private keys (what is the progress here?)
- The affiliate part of the referral program practically working on Open Ledger (maybe it's already done and I just don't know about it?)
- API ready for trading bots (as far as I know, we are still missing the ability to query your open orders)
- Worker/Committee proposal creation on the GUI level
I hope we can see more than 2 'real' committee members. There are 9 inits and 2 com members - bitcrab and clayop - total 11 active com members. When bitcrab was voted in, puppies was voted out. When clayop was voted in, bitcrab was voted out. And now, when bitcrab was voted in, mindphlux was voted out. How can we have more than 2 'real' committee members?
Ya I get the link removal that's understandable however the official builds are borked. But this guy brings shame to the community with his arrogance. FYI there are several exchanges that have been having trouble and have received little if any real world help (and they know who I am since i am not new in the exchange owners circle). Which is partially because integrating into an exchange is a bit more complex than most would think.
Nothing against Charles... but why do you guys care so much what he thinks about bts? And why are you complaining that he didn't talk about your coin in an interview?He himself brought an interview to bitshares forum in which he does not mention bitshares. And keeps demanding to discuss the interview. Doesnt it seem odd?
There are probably a lot better ways to promote bts than sitting here whining about Charles
yeap, it was a democratic decision made by the commitee members in 4 minutes if you read the post in the top.
I'm out. This is a huge disappointment
You've been in for 5 minutes....if you sell, you sell...but check back in on this thread in 30 days and let's talk.
It's dropping like a rock!
Username spam is breaking bitshares.
Around 2015-10-14T19:21:39 dele-puppy attempted to claim a vesting balance (his witness pay) and as a result the network split 60/40 because 40% of the witnesses thought the transaction was invalid.
As a result the last irreversible block hung around block 33845 (the block prior to the one that forked the network). The blockchain grew to 269 blocks before 2/3's of the witnesses managed to agree and extend the last irreversible block back to the typical 20 to 30 behind the head block number.
In this situation everyone on the network was accurately reporting the state and the user interfaces indicated to the users that their operations were pending confirmation. Any / all exchanges following the last irreversible block would have been OK.
We have determined the cause is due to some non-deterministic behavior in witness pay that resolves itself with a replay. After replaying the blockchain all witnesses agreed the transaction was valid.
We will continue to monitor the blockchain for issues as we look for the underlying cause. In the meantime this particular failure can be mitigated by witnesses periodically replaying their blockchain.
Despite the "bug" everything is working just fine and your funds are safe.
Using the referral system at this moment seems a bit vague.this.
Is there a method in place for us non-wallet providers to refer a user and get some portion of the referral credit?
If so, what is/are the page(s)/website(s) we are are supposed to refer a user to?
If so, please provide an example of the exact way we should format the link with our referral code.
Thank you.
100 TPS / 1 hour test will take place at 10/8 18:00 UTC (14:00 EST, 11:00 PST)I always have a hard time converting to my local time, so if anybody has the same promblem here you go: