i would say -"everyone, look at your own behavior"
- i changed a long time my bank, because they are charging ZERO fees
- i always go to the cheapest electricity provider
- i always be on the cheapest telco and internet provider
where i have a choice i will go to the cheapest place - IF - the service is compareable to other companies.
so, in my opinion clayop said a good point - we should match the fees with our competition
- in the sense of transfering i would say, at the moment the competition is bitcoin and not the banks or paypal, this could change in the future but not right now, so we should match our fees to bitcoin fees.
(i think with the same transferfees, in the future it is a now brainer to use bitshares, because we will be so much more convenient then bitcoin)
- in the sense of trading (our core feature) at the moment our competition are the crypto exchanges and most of them charging 0.2 % per trade or less.
Why we can not charge ZERO placing fees for traders?
- because we think we will get spammed with orders, but let us discuss if we can find other ways to prefend this
what can we do, that someone will not spam our network?
- we want liquidity and what about solutions like - if the order is at least 0.5% away and x amount high and will be active for x hours we will charge ZERO fees
at least on pegged assets we should find this kind of solution. We should implement an order typ that i can place my order % away from settlement(feedprice), then if i match the
other criterias like amount and time this order will be for free.
i am not a coder and i suspect this will not bloat our system, because only serious people will get this advantage. a "normal" trader dont care how much the fees are, he will go to the best
place he can aquire the needed shares. So we have to create liquidity and i presented just an idea how we can create liquidity, without the problem of to much bloat.