另外想到一个方案可以按市场权重计算喂价，不是按交易成交量算，而是按交易成交价上下5%的买单卖单深度取最小值作为权重
因为交易量是很容易刷的，但成交价附近5%的深度不容易作假，我觉得作为权重比较保险。
内盘想夺回定价权需要更好的市场深度

  各种国产垃圾币的主使  坑爹主使你好啊  清疯兄  还记得被你拉进8个山寨币群的本小爹么

因为现在的喂价计算完全依赖外部市场，导致内盘无任何话语权，这样是很不公平的。

但到底哪个市场才是真正有话语权的，我认为靠程序无法自动识别，因此比重会完全由  delegate 自行设定，最终价格按各个市场权重计算。

我准备提供5个市场供选择：内盘USD，内盘CNY，比特时代，云币，比特儿。
另外每个市场的价格会继续按采样取中间值的方式，靠成交量的方式会导致更容易被操控，有时候刷成交量是很容易做到的。采样点个数同样有各个delegate自定义。

大家觉得这样的方式怎么样？

What do you think about my new price feed mechanism ?

The status quo is that the price feed is rely on the external market , so the inner-market has no weight in the price , that is not fair .
But which market should have the real weight ? I think it can't be calculated by a program . So , we should let the delegates decide the weight value , and the final price feed should be calculated by the respective weight value .
I'm planing on offering five markets to weight in : inner-market USD price , inner-market CNY price , BTC38 , Yunbi , Bter .
Further more , the price of each market will continue to choose the sampling of intermediate value , because if we rely on volume it would be more easy to manipulate . The numbers for sampling points should be decided by the individual delegates as well .
How about that ?

SO someone finds thin buy orders.. sells to them and price decreases.  Then feed is lowered briefly and they can purchase bts shorts below what they should be able to.  Market quickly corrects and they have a lead in their shorts because the shorts were bought at a lower price?

I've been trying to understand all the market stuff so this is my guess.  Anyone?

Quote from: cn-members on November 17, 2014, 02:07:47 pm

Quote from: abit on November 17, 2014, 09:35:28 am

在英文社区看到有帖子提到这个事，但是没找到详细说明，例如为什么要花，如何花。
谁知道的麻烦出来说下，谢谢。

AGS是I3的捐赠收入，捐赠在本年年底就要收35%的税，所以I3直接预先支付给各个开发者，这就是“花光”的意思。

哦，预先支付，这可以理解。不过，这个预支算下来有几个月工资？
另外，toast想运行一个100% pay rate的受托人是因为没拿到上面的预支工资？怎么不见其他人出来说要做100%受托人。