abit也说了第一阶段直接转入第三阶段，用bitcny挖矿。我认为可以快一点，第一阶段没必要再搞下去了。这样巨鲸少多了吧。
      bitcny挂单挖矿也应当取消梯度奖励，改为一定范围内只要挂单就平均奖励，买单实行梯度奖励就可以了。理由如下：
      1、我们也是不希望bitcny被压盘的，还是快点涨到1为好，鼓励低价挂单，越低奖励越大，这确实不合理。
      2、这样人人可以参与，不必非要搞个机器人。
      3、在现在的制度下，还是没办法避免巨鲸问题。实际上梯度奖励对巨鲸更有利，毕竟人家的机器人技术可不是小散能比的。

Quote from: bitcrab on December 19, 2019, 03:49:06 am

up to now it seems the community is not sufficiently convinced that Graphene Lab is qualified enough for the core work.

"The GrapheneLabs proposal is welcomed. Thus far, it lacks support from the Community. Cheaper developers “may” deliver better value to the DAC. However, I’ve not seen any contributions from the listed team members which indicate their ability to deliver solutions at an economical rate."

"It's a daunting job and poor code contributions leads to increased/unpleasant review time. for example, We found working with ********** difficult to impossible as their code quality was not accepted by the reviewers. The resulting costs were too high for their efforts."

I feel Graphene Lab need to provide more persuasive information to convince the community...

I would like to know to whom the second quote applies and whose phrase is this?

If this is about our team, then who said it and on what project, and if not about us, then why is it here?

As for the quality of work, our developers have extensive experience working both with the BitShares core and with other large developments.

Of course, in any code there may be errors, blockchain stops in 2018 and 2017 proves that even developers who constantly work with BitShares do not guarantee excellent quality of work.
That is why in the first stages of work we will devote a lot of time to code audit in order to minimize the probability of errors and even better study the core of the system

我不反对收bts，只是建议要有收锚定资产的这个选项，行情好的时候我们收锚定资产做粮食储备（或者换成大饼做外汇储备），行情渣的时候我们收bts搞回收，总好过单一的选项。

其实说白了就是持有bitcny去挂单就可以赚利息，锁bitcny减少流通，鼓励持有bitcny.

大家都在这样搞，makerdao不也是在搞存dai赚利息嘛