1
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [APT&MI][status]BitShares.org and Collaboration with BBF[invite]
« on: June 05, 2018, 12:45:15 pm »About unclear part - I'm non-native English, so longer sentences can be an issue to properly construct them, but here it goes... We are saying that we will follow steps of the Foundation, mission objectives and obey/apply with existing rules around the blockchain. We are asking Foundation for recognition of us as another Foundation, since they were the beginning of all. All tools for accounting and current work they are doing, if we gonna continue, we will do their way. - In simple words, Unity of Voice and Actions are something we are looking here for. 2 Foundations doing what they want without agreement and simple basic rules would be just more Chaos to "decentralization".
And re - independent of the BBF and Stakeholders - We can pursue, and as you can see, we are doing it for months in different ways and specific needs community/blockchain has at the moment, but in the end we can only REALISE it if the Stake-Holders make approval once Worker is up.
DL,
Thanks for the reply, and I very much appreciate the effort and difficulty of producing an English language version of this post.
I clearly understand the part about getting approval from stakeholders to do something. But I am still uncertain about what it means for the BBF to recognize another Foundation.
The trivial interpretation is that BBF recognizes that the Move Institute exists. I am not sure what value this brings so this interpretation is probably incorrect.
A more substantive interpretation might be (and perhaps this is not what you are seeking) is a declaration by the BBF that the Move Institute is another foundation that follows its practices, protocols, and accounting. If that is the objective I think that it is awkward for the following reasons: (a) such a description by the BBF might be lengthy and detailed and might include descriptions that are specific to the EU, (b) such a description might be expensive and time-consuming to produce, and (c) BBF might not have the ability nor interest to certify (once never mind periodically) that the Move Institute is following such practices, protocols, and accounting because there are legal risks and implications of doing this.
Perhaps a middle ground interpretation is that the Move Institute is asking for guidance from the BBF about suggested practices, protocols, and accounting (the (a) from above) so that the Move Institute might consider adopting some or all of them. I think that this approach might be something more practical for both the BBF and the Move Institute.