Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Lighthouse has asked me to take over this bounty. I have decided to increase the bounty and fund it from the AGS address. Everyone who submitted donations to this bounty should post a refund address so Lighthouse can refund your bounty and then I encourage you to use your refund to buy AGS.
Domsch,
This seems to be your second proposal to Invictus; this being the first: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1578.0
I personally applaud your spirit and creativity, but if the first proposal was to create an innovative and comprehensive marketing ideology that encompasses many aspects and would probably warrant a complete team to execute, how then one month later are you prepared to launch this much different venture that in essence is about a 180 degree difference in its nature (marketing to legal/regulatory)?
Are you still working on the marketing plan from the link above? Do you have a separate team dedicated to it?
Can you provide any evidence to your success in the areas of marketing and/or legal regulatory compliance?
I think this bounty needs to be tripled. It's very important and it's stalling.Or just wait till the spending power of 163 PTS is much more. Which could be a few weeks as far as Bitcoin is concerned.
Or perhaps we should have a method so that users can simply add their donations to a bounty if the perceive it to be particularly important.
If it's only restricted within the very early players, the newcomer will feel excluded, especially when the BTS community is not big enough now.
That's the point.
If founder registration is opened again, I'd want my PTS back, since I donated under very specific conditions.
LoL, what if the new founder ID has to be referred by old founder ID, and half of the donation belongs to the referrer? Anyway, I will be glad if someone figures out a method to satisfies the new comers and old guys at the same time.
Invictus Innovations
DAC's
Bitshares family
Protoshares
Angelshares
Domainshares
etc.
Keyhotee
Again, why are protoshares and angelshares under bitshares, when they will also be involved with *totally unrelated* DACs?
"Because marketing" is not sufficient.
Seems to me it should be more like:
I3
DACs
BitShares
BitShares BEX
BitShares CEX
ProtoShares
AngelShares
DomainShares
Keyhotee
).
people who donated for angelshares, please give me feedback on this tool. https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1989.0
it's important to verify this is working as desired and all transactions are displayed correctly. thanks
1/3/14
slow day today
1 to arcke
2 each to me and ripplexiaofan
3 to barwizi for taking initiative
2 rolling over
final balance ~4.5
tx id: 2004f8bd10ad24e0f513fd6d1a7ab211124897965242bc030791ef46191f5fb1
----
(I haven't been tipping dan/stan, should I?)
Looks like the sell wall at BTER has disappeared... no one is selling PTS right now!
http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/orderbook.php?pair=pts-btc&market=bter
In case you'd like someone to help you with "press releases" and handling relations with journalists - Am glad to help.
Am not good in writing -but am good in handling relationships and if me or my associates can step in and help we'd be glad. My partner is a member of 2 major accelerators (one in london and one in Hong Kong) and I am well associated with one in India. We'd be glad to help in whatever ways possible.
I feel a small round of PR round-up will have our value soaring , more early adapters.
I feel having more adapters would also be good as it can push us to faster bug fixes.
Am just disappointed I haven't seen anything major so far and with the value of BTC hitting a rock bottom (considering the rate at which its going) - I fear the trust people have in PTS could also diminish.
I will have Brian contact you.
