31
MemoryCoin / Re: New YAM version release
« on: July 05, 2014, 09:51:59 pm »
IDK about sandy-bridge E, you should try the other architecture like generic or ivy bridge to see if they work out.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
i am running fc20 of ppc64 on ibm cpu( POWER7), can you make and release binaries for power7 cpu?
I don't think Memorycoin will survive the onslaught of new alt coins being released with far better technologies and features.You forget to realize that this coin's structure is different from any other's. Shareholders choose exactly who to work with on the developer team by weighed decision. We've realized there are imperfections in the code after the launch of many other coins and decided that Memorycoin 3.0 would coin the name of improvements to the code that shareholders and the community have decided to implement.
I'm nervous that your plans for change are too ambitious and with your relative inexperience you'll have difficulty implementing and co-ordinating the changes in a live currency. Even if you do manage it, few people will take another look at a coin they think they understand already. Stalemate's manner is abrasive, but his advice is good - implement your new ideas in a new coin, leave MMC to run its course.
haven't you noticed that MemoryCoin died long time ago? Volume is below 1 BTC daily. Nobody mining the coin, there's no developer, there's no blog posts on its website, dead reddit page, not-working block explorer (see: coinmarketcap), etc etc...
can you prove what you are saying?
sure: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4786.0
so you made a statement in 2 May, and after many weeks (30 May) Delinquency made a post that you say it proves u say?! Man you got the power..............
Just because no one from Memorycoin community what to buy your stuff, doesn't mean the coin is dead.
I pointed out that it was not hard to see MMC is dead in May 2. Subsequently, the CEO of MemoryCoin proved me right by his suggestion - MMC 3.0! Have you seen any altcoin that has a top version like that? It's like saying "oh well, we had fucked up 2 times before but we are very hopeful for our 3rd attempt!" Yeah, people will surely buy it.
The decision of delisting MMC should not be affiliated with our amount of sales as it is irrelevant. I personally had worked for this community in the past without expecting anything and promoted MMC in the best possible way. My approach may be regarded as pragmatist but I don't care what you say/think.
You better stop arguing with me because the recent situation of MMC is very clear. It is all going down for 6 months. You are still wasting your precious time and have been suffering because of a poor management. If you had voted me at least, as your marketing officer in the past instead of an unknown guy (you know who he is), things would be different, definitely. From what I learned from this community, do not offer something good for MMC cause it's never got appreciated.
My suggestion to you guys: Forget MMC, develop something better with a new name/brand.
for security reasons I thing nobody should give such information's to anybody...
Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D using Tapatalk
What's the problem with letting shareholders in on Team Communications + Developments as they happen?
I think he may have been talking about associating a name / account to one of the top 100 address. If ever the coin become worth a lot of money then so would those addresses and the accounts may become a target. I'm just speculating here about what he meant but that would make sense.
for security reasons I thing nobody should give such information's to anybody...
Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D using Tapatalk