16
General Discussion / Re: Looking for a tech to run my delegate
« on: January 07, 2015, 11:02:39 am »You'll get my vote and my full support also
You have watched his said campaign video I suppose, otherwise you are acting unprofessional as you are sort of "official" imo.
Ive watched all his video interviews so far, and read his book. He is a real pro. He has my full support as well. He is helping to get things going as much or more than anyone I know.
I have watched them too. The point remains that he already will enjoy the fruits of everyone elses labor with this bonus and there is no way to decouple him from this unfair advantage. What he will make from the marketcap doubling will not be shared by the others who have contributed to that increase. Can you honestly say he is the only person in a non development role who deserves the deal he is already getting? It should be a simple, and honorable choice. Either play fair with all the other marketing delegates by tearing up the previous contract and running his own delegate, share the bonus with all community marketing members, or just dont run a delegate.
I dont like my chances of convincing you otherwise tickle, but I think you could look at this another way.
1. All delegates and stake holders are tied together. We either all win or we all lose. There is no way to de-couple that. And it works both ways. I could do an outstanding job and the tech team could never release protocol 1.0 and I get nothing. This is business. In my busineess that I am ignoring while I work on bitshares, I have marketers, tech teams and CEO's all on incentive structures based on revenues and profits. There is no way to de-couple. It would be great if there were, but there is not. I would rather be judged on some nice neat metric that I have total control over. A metric that is not affected by others. I am very confident in my ability to get views and drive interest in BirShares. Unfortunately I must take the team risk like everybody else.
2. In any large organization there are lots of different payrates/ salaries/ bonuses, etc. That is because everyone has different value. There is no point grumbling about that. I certainly did not grumble that Brian got X, or Stan gets Y or Bytemaster gets Z. I just made a proposal to BM which he accepted and got to work. All I can do is be open and honest and that agreement and make a proposal. The share holders will decide if I am delivering enough value to receive their vote. The market will speak shortly and I will have to live with their decision just like every other delegate proposal must.
Accept your pay already will reward you handsomely if ANY marketing delegate or initiative becomes effective...even if your own efforts fail (Is this a fair measure of value?) This is a blatant mischaracterisation of fairness in this system because you obviously refuse to tear up the prior contract...or share it.
No others got this deal and the last time i checked the community didnt sign off on it. This is perfectly obvious. You are somehow as an appendage of brians days here grandfathered into a contract that will no doubt be very beneficial to you in the long term, but that is no longer enough.
Even you once said you felt it would be unfair for you to run a delegate because of this and now you are completely turning a 180?