for any small change there will always be big complain, need not to care that much, and I doubt whether it's a good idea to make many rules for how to create and implement proposals, because the proposals are different and the context that need them are also different.
Yes, for any small change there will always be somebody complaining, that doesn't mean we should not care that much tho.
We should not think that the decision we reached is the ultimate true and right decision. We should always be open to consider and analyze new point of view that may change our vision too.
Some rules, or better "guidelines", are definitely needed.
If it is NOT a real emergency we should respect some fixed timing about the time duration of the proposals, their review period and such, no matter the scope or the context of those proposals.
We should act for the community best interest, but we should also make the community FEEL SAFE from our power. We should always give them the possibility to knock us/our proposals down.
Regardless the timing, I think something like this could be a good start:
1-Make a First forum post to introduce the topic, what we think about it, our pro and cons. Discussion needed here.
2-Gather information and community proposals from the post above.
3-Make a Second forum post with a poll (or another kind of poll less subject to manipulation...idk) including our suggestions and community's more relevant suggestion too.
4-Give time to the community to vote and continue to express their thought.
5-Make a committee proposal with the results we gather from 4-
6-Give to the community enough time to 1)vote for the submitted proposal or 2)unvote committee members
Any other better ideas would be great and welcomed