BitShares Forum
Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: Webber on July 14, 2014, 09:53:18 am
-
As we all know TITAN is real anonymous on blockchain,so no one can know receiver and sender of one trasaction by default.But I think set TITAN become optional is reasonable.For example,I make a deal with A ,and I want to open to pay 100XTS to A ,so A can't not to admit this deal because this transaction is open to everyone.
Moreover,sometimes we need to create a open account that every receive and send can open to everyone. I think TITAN is redundant for some account that need to monitor by public .Like bts from AGS before 2.28.
So,receiver/sender anonymous or account anonymous optional function is very pratical.
-
As we all know TITAN is real anonymous on blockchain,so no one can know receiver and sender of one trasaction by default.But I think set TITAN become optional is reasonable.For example,I make a deal with A ,and I want to open to pay 100XTS to A ,so A can't not to admit this deal because this transaction is open to everyone.
Moreover,sometimes we need to create a open account that every receive and send can open to everyone. I think TITAN is redundant for some account that need to monitor by public .Like bts from AGS before 2.28.
So,if receiver/sender anonymous or account anonymous optional function is very pratical.
+5%
-
good idea
-
It sounds reasonable
-
The blockchain supports this mode of operation, it is simply a matter of exposing it in the user interface.
-
+5%
-
The blockchain supports this mode of operation, it is simply a matter of exposing it in the user interface.
very good, intergrate this mode in GUI client is better.
-
+5%
-
As long as it is on by default, that is critical.