Quote from: binggo on September 04, 2019, 02:24:04 am

Quote from: oxarbitrage on September 03, 2019, 04:23:18 pm

Put the core work in Chinese kids hands for 10 usd an hour and bitshares will probably be dead in a few months with luck independently of the price. The bitshares core haves the highest quality standards than any other graphene project, it is a very hard work for men(or woman), not for kids.

en？！

I am trying to defend the core team work, my apologies if i offended you. It is not a matter or where are the programmers from but more how old they are.

The witnesses are paid from the reserve pool (https://how.bitshares.works/en/master/bts_holders/community_members.html#witnesses) if a large amount of the pool is burned, then witness payment/rewards are threatened & fees would have to rise to compensate. Don't destroy the reserve pool please.

Quote from: ioBanker on September 03, 2019, 09:25:27 am

Please mention the BSIP so we can push for it

The initial version is limited to market fees and not flat BTS fees:
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/pull/133/files#diff-6ff5a943ba1c6c4da49be09c93482041

## Motivation
- To provide additional marketing tools to encourage traders.
- To increase trading volume on BitShares.
- To attract traders to the ecosystem.

\> 50K | 0.01% | 0.07% 

那就别JJYY去了，我受够了BTS了，马上开发出 BTC ETH EOS LTC 统一抵押出 GCNY的功能，我要换车了，不再想碰BTS了。让BTS见鬼去吧。

Quote from: binggo on September 02, 2019, 11:29:02 pm

Quote from: clockwork on September 02, 2019, 10:06:39 am

Quote from: binggo on September 01, 2019, 12:51:57 am

Quote from: lovegan007 on August 31, 2019, 06:03:45 pm

为了鼓励参与高倍数抵押的人，应该在“解冻余额”中可以申领 连续抵押了多少天的账户可以申领 理事会的系统中的那10亿BTS的拿一部分来奖励，或者拿市场手续费的一倍份来分红。

不要盯着资金池里的10亿BTS，本来就不应该存在的东西，导致现在人人都在盯着资金池，而不是用真正的收入来覆盖支出，增发的资金池本来是为基础开发置留的，而不是为了各种会议及架构留的.

一个refund400k就能把老外搞的各种疯狂，当初抵制增发的时候这帮人又是什么样的嘴脸？！

锚定资产区收的锚定资产手续费倒是可以拿一部分用来给高倍长期抵押的用户分点红，毕竟这些羊毛出在羊身上，用在羊身上也无可厚非，相当于负利率。

老外的思维落后时代太多，很多问题我们指出并提出解决方案时，他们还在持续性的各种懵逼中，坚持自己的看法就是宇宙真理，等到漫长的时间流逝之后，他们中可能才会有那么一两个人才会意识到问题的表面。

I agree with you regarding real income.

I wrote about this 18 months ago:

https://steemit.com/bitshares/@clockwork/bitshares-fees-the-fee-schedule-and-dex-profitability

I then spent 3 months analyzing chain data and in discussions with stakeholders and traders to implement a new , more efficient/profitable fee schedule.

And then I was treated like the enemy for suggesting that the chain should be profitable like you are saying now and the fee change was cancelled leading to the state of the reserve pool now.

I've ALWAYS acted and commented with the best interests of the platform in mind. It's others who are voting only with their pocket.

BURN the 0.85 B bts in the reserve pool, then some argument will  not exsit

I don't think that'll have the impact you expect it to, fees would probably have to be dramatically increased so as to just be able to pay witnesses.

Quote from: binggo on September 02, 2019, 09:01:35 am

https://bts.ai/u/openledger-ops

https://bts.ai/u/openledger-corporate

So，workers.bitshares.foundation dump bts in the DEX to get bitcny/bitusd，and then pay bitusd/bitcny to openledger-corporate，

the openledger-ops buy bts in DEX，then dump bts in binance-bts-1？

This was part of the bitshares-core worker, which OpenLedger actively contributes to. This payment was for invoice 23_Invoice_20190731_OL on https://workers.bitshares.foundation/201902-bitshares-core