Great thinking here. I'm not sure about burning the AGS funds, even though I agree in principle that the of burning the other funds and then re-allocating them via dilution would be true to the DAC model, but with 1000 things going on it may be better on this occasion to just allow i3 to keep them, I'm undecided on the matter. There's a lot of work to be done in the region of delegate showcase + transparency, I don't know that the system is ready to deal with that yet.
As for the private forum, sounds like it could work but there are problems such as - a stakeholder would have to have access to their BTS to access the forum, what if they were on a different computer? I don't have access to mine all the time and who decides how big the percentage should be to be allowed in, do we need a vote on that?
The biggest risk I see for the whole BTS project is flash crashes. From this criticism:
prestonbyrne.com/2014/08/17/dont-walk-away-run/
I was going to propose creating kind of a 'reserve fund' to buy up BTS in the event of say a 50% flashcrash to protect us. Say BTS price drops 50% in x hours, delegates receive alerts to prompt them to release the fund to place buy orders, stopping the crash and saving everyone. Maybe the fund could be held in bitcoin with multisig wallet with a few delegates in control. I mean a single large stake holder could accidentally crash the whole thing! What if they got drunk and recklessly sold? I don't want to be depending on no one dumping suddenly. Having some kind of reserve fund to back up the BTS or at least a method that allows a fund to begin to form. This region is a part of BTS I'm still haven't fully wrapped my head around but it seems having collateral in some other form would strengthen the system, maybe a basket other cryptos could be used. Just an idea...