That's unfortunate .. not that I mine .. but to see that you picked a contractor that does deliver :(
That's unfortunate .. not that I mine .. but to see that you picked a contractor that does deliver :(
his pool has been delivered for the better part of 2 months, he simply chose not to use the software.
ill let freebie handle this one...
Not the first complaint here
"Beware of FreebieServers LLC and their developer Michael": https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20034.0.html
Why not talked via cellphone and/or skype calls? There seems to be lack of communication and organization.. form both parts, or this wouldn't happen.
Not the first complaint here
"Beware of FreebieServers LLC and their developer Michael": https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20034.0.html
I'm just saying, the new pool has been ready for people to mine on for over a month, I mean Bunker himself has been mining on it for over a month now (screenshot of payouts db):
(http://i.imgur.com/gRLRmDr.png)
As kuro put it, I'm just going to let @Freebieservers handle this in terms of discussion, I just felt obligated to point out this skewed mentality of "it's entirely our fault."
I thought I was reading the NXT thread for a moment. You guys have exactly the same defense. Ouch.
Here's hoping BCL gets what he needs.
I'm just saying, the new pool has been ready for people to mine on for over a month, I mean Bunker himself has been mining on it for over a month now (screenshot of payouts db):
(http://i.imgur.com/gRLRmDr.png)
As kuro put it, I'm just going to let @Freebieservers handle this in terms of discussion, I just felt obligated to point out this skewed mentality of "it's entirely our fault."
were more than willing to go through any arbitration, you can keep saying get it done and claiming its not done all you want, doesnt make it true, to anyone who wants to mine on his new pool:
http://216.146.143.200/dashboard
as you can see from the stats its been up and been mined on for a month or so.
Just curious, why shut down the old pool until the new one is 100% up and running? I don't care if payouts are manual and once a week etc... just want my cards earning bts!
I tried to connect to stratum+tcp://216.146.143.177:4447 two different miners said the pool dead did u put a wrong number for stratum thanksJust curious, why shut down the old pool until the new one is 100% up and running? I don't care if payouts are manual and once a week etc... just want my cards earning bts!
hey pal dont worry the new pool has been up for over a month, why dont you just try it out for yourself
http://216.146.143.200/dashboard/getstarted
Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Are there higher difficulty ports?Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
Just curious, why shut down the old pool until the new one is 100% up and running? I don't care if payouts are manual and once a week etc... just want my cards earning bts!
hey pal dont worry the new pool has been up for over a month, why dont you just try it out for yourself
http://216.146.143.200/dashboard/getstarted
Are there higher difficulty ports?Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
Are there higher difficulty ports?Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
Will have to talk to kuro about this (seem's he's been off for the night) I'm sure he'll reply in the morning, cheers. @kuro112
A second VarDiff stratum port (4445) suitable for large GPU rigs and scrypt ASICs allows a range of 4096 to 32768.
Proxy Pool:
https://github.com/dogestreet/proxypool
Install and configure the software provided and link it to the modified UNOMP via the provided instructions, and plug in the pools you want to switch to via their instructions.Enable capability to mine multipools like NiceHash
Implement upstream pool proxy mining to smooth profitability for high-difficulty coins (litecoin, doge, dash, bitcoin) (https://github.com/Stratehm/stratum-proxy, https://github.com/dogestreet/proxypool)
Ready to implement stratum port DDoS protection - ie. Incapsula (https://www.incapsula.com/ddos/)
Have the website translated to other languages to attract miners from other countries (Manderin, Hindi, Spanish, Russian)
Nice Charts (highcharts) of Pool Hash Algo
Miner Payout Lookups
Miner Real Time Hash Rate stats along with estimated daily payouts
Establish a high and stable history of payouts on multipool.us and coinking.io
Enable BTS address mining using username or public_key
Automated Payouts - Payouts are done once a day now manually in bitUSD. All funds now are mined and automatically sent to exchanges where they are auto traded to BTC. From BTC we then go to metaexchange.info or blocktrades.us to get the price for BTC/bitUSD at current market price, and then send that amount out from our delegate balance.
[11/23/2015 11:01:57 AM]
Kuro: hey reactivating this group as its realvent to all of us
[11/23/2015 11:01:59 AM] Kuro: anoncoin cannabiscoin digitalcoin litecoin myriadcoin potcoin saffroncoin startcoin uro worldcoin
auroracoin dash fractalcoin megacoin novacoin quatloo smartcoin syscoin viacoin
[11/23/2015 11:02:06 AM] Kuro: please make sure you have wallets for each of these ready
[11/23/2015 11:02:14 AM] Kuro: and if you didnt before, give us the new wallet addy
[11/23/2015 11:02:19 AM] Kuro: (cryptsy)
[11/23/2015 11:02:41 AM] Kuro: from one glance i can tell you were for sure missing a few
[11/23/2015 11:03:56 AM] Kuro: once we have the payout system configured for the new coins ill swap unomp for the current install
[11/23/2015 11:04:10 AM] Kuro: then all thats left is to point your dns to the new front end
[11/23/2015 11:04:14 AM] Kuro: and run the payouts
[11/23/2015 11:06:10 AM] Kuro: let us know when you have the new wallets ready please and thanks
[11/23/2015 5:58:13 PM] Jonathan Bunker: I will have all the wallets verified tomorrow
[11/24/2015 9:14:53 PM] hybridd: Cryptsy is/has been being DDoSed for the last little while, so there might be some down time / delay on the payments occuring.
[11/25/2015 2:17:09 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok
[11/25/2015 2:17:12 PM] Jonathan Bunker: so we are not going to move the wallets
[11/25/2015 2:17:15 PM] Jonathan Bunker: we are going to leave them where the yare
[11/25/2015 2:17:23 PM] Jonathan Bunker: all the wallets have been worked on
[11/25/2015 2:17:27 PM] Jonathan Bunker: and are working
[11/25/2015 2:17:56 PM] Jonathan Bunker: lets see if we can get this working tonight
[12/1/2015 7:00:03 PM] Jonathan Bunker: Seriously great way for us to get hacked
[12/1/2015 7:00:05 PM] hybridd: all your rpcs are localhost bound they reject external connection
[12/1/2015 7:00:13 PM] hybridd: there's no way to get hacked lol
[12/1/2015 7:00:36 PM] hybridd: not to mention funds are constantly being moved off the RPCs to cryptsty, if there is a breach of security the loss is inisignificant
[12/1/2015 7:01:14 PM] hybridd: If you want added security, I can add basic http auth to that page so it requires a user/pw to see.
[12/1/2015 7:01:22 PM] hybridd: but it's not nessesary.
[12/1/2015 7:01:42 PM] Jonathan Bunker: What if wallets take a public address to be on remote systems
[12/1/2015 7:02:03 PM] hybridd: what do you mean?
[12/1/2015 7:02:12 PM] hybridd: do you want to jump on a call, I think it'd be easier to discuss verbably
[12/1/2015 7:02:41 PM] Jonathan Bunker: We want wallets to not be on the same physical machine as the mining pool
[12/1/2015 7:03:12 PM] hybridd: that's fine, the way Bunker.Transfer moves the funds is by SSHing to the machine that the wallets are on
[12/1/2015 7:03:28 PM] hybridd: So even if it's on a different machine, that's no problem and doesnt' change the way our system works
[12/1/2015 7:04:15 PM] Jonathan Bunker: Pass protect that page is necessary at least to satisfy perceptions of security of the pool
[12/1/2015 7:04:27 PM] hybridd: Alright, no problem I will get that added tonight.
[12/1/2015 7:05:11 PM] hybridd: That page isn't mentioned anywhere publicly, so only with fusking would the url be found, so it is fine for now, but I will get a password added asap.
[11/22/2015 9:26:38 PM] Kuro: i was thinking we could give an update on your behalf and take the blame, we have been doing family stuff over the weekend but intend to launch first thing in the morning, we just need to sit down with you tomorrow morning and handle the small details during the launch
[11/22/2015 9:26:55 PM] Kuro: what time is good for you
[11/22/2015 9:27:25 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. I will be at the bunker 9:30am my time.. I have a LOT going on tomorrow though.. so I will only have some inbetween time
[11/22/2015 9:27:49 PM] Kuro: okay we will be on and launching around then
[11/22/2015 9:28:56 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. see u then
[11/22/2015 9:29:23 PM] Kuro: do you want us to post the update?
[11/22/2015 9:31:22 PM] Jonathan Bunker: no.. at this point there is nothing else other than getting it done that is going to be satisfying... lets get the payouts out and get the mining pool updated and get going.. then see what needs to be said at that point.
The information regarding the DEVELOPMENT POOL was not authorized to be made public. (This is the only *real* violation of the NDA they are under that has been mentioned in this thread.)
I am willing to test Script and SHA on the new pool.
How often are payouts and will BitShares users get paid using:
http://216.146.143.200/dashboard (http://216.146.143.200/dashboard)
I have one more question when I put quotes in the username my miner won't connect in the getting started on the pool it states specifically to put quotes is this right as as I take those quotes out the pool says alive with quotes the pool say dead thanks
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "hybrid",
"url":"stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449",
"user": "hybr1d USD",
"pass": "x"
}
],
I have one more question when I put quotes in the username my miner won't connect in the getting started on the pool it states specifically to put quotes is this right as as I take those quotes out the pool says alive with quotes the pool say dead thanks
That part seems not working for me as well. I rather see username.USD or password USD . Is it possible to fix devs?
got u so that's for s configuration file for cgminer but not a bat file cause when I tried to set my miner in minera it said the pool was dead also multiminer and my other rigs where on miningrigrentals they told me the pool was dead as soon as I took those quotes out it was good now I also believe when I left those quotes out and put oakmaster USD my mining programs didn't recognize it I don't use conf. files with anyb of my miners and I don't think a lot of other ppl do so if it's the case it's going to cause ppl not to be able to mine a bit asset
Why not?got u so that's for s configuration file for cgminer but not a bat file cause when I tried to set my miner in minera it said the pool was dead also multiminer and my other rigs where on miningrigrentals they told me the pool was dead as soon as I took those quotes out it was good now I also believe when I left those quotes out and put oakmaster USD my mining programs didn't recognize it I don't use conf. files with anyb of my miners and I don't think a lot of other ppl do so if it's the case it's going to cause ppl not to be able to mine a bit asset
If the space is causing that much of a problem, I propose we use a different character then since we are unable to use the password field for this. What other characters are not allowed in BTS 2.0 usernames? Is the pound symbol (#) allowed? If it is not, then we could do something like hybr1d#USD
Why not?got u so that's for s configuration file for cgminer but not a bat file cause when I tried to set my miner in minera it said the pool was dead also multiminer and my other rigs where on miningrigrentals they told me the pool was dead as soon as I took those quotes out it was good now I also believe when I left those quotes out and put oakmaster USD my mining programs didn't recognize it I don't use conf. files with anyb of my miners and I don't think a lot of other ppl do so if it's the case it's going to cause ppl not to be able to mine a bit asset
If the space is causing that much of a problem, I propose we use a different character then since we are unable to use the password field for this. What other characters are not allowed in BTS 2.0 usernames? Is the pound symbol (#) allowed? If it is not, then we could do something like hybr1d#USD
sgminer.exe -k x11mod -o stratum+tcp://216.146.143.177:5559 -u proctologic -p USD -I d -g 1 -w 128
"name" : "Bitshares pool X11",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://216.146.143.177:5559",
"user" : "proctologic",
"pass" : "USD"
I'm not sure I no most pool u put . in between to keep track of ur miners so I have oakmaster.worker1 and so on but I don't no if bitshares names have . I no I use - in a few but I do no the standard at most pool use the . so I no none of the mining software will give a problem
password for the asset u want to mine if u just want bts we can use the simple x that will work
edit didn't see it would be more of a problem to change the pass so there no other $ ! # / \ & * we can use I don't no what bts don't allow in their username or I'd throw one out there
k it seams to be good my miner wasnt connecting so even for BTS you have to put | in so I just changed to oakmaster|BTS and it's all good now I was checking out the pool I see CNY in there so we can mine any bitasset we want even BITBTC and so on that's freaking awesomepassword for the asset u want to mine if u just want bts we can use the simple x that will work
edit didn't see it would be more of a problem to change the pass so there no other $ ! # / \ & * we can use I don't no what bts don't allow in their username or I'd throw one out there
I've added "|" as a delimiter for an asset, so try mining with the name for example: hybr1d|USD and that should work as well (instead of a space). For the record, the pool is at ~0.019 BTC so payout should be soon... (need to mine 0.01 BTC more b/c its moved in 0.01 chunks, so could be a few more hours).
Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
k it seams to be good my miner wasnt connecting so even for BTS you have to put | in so I just changed to oakmaster|BTS and it's all good now I was checking out the pool I see CNY in there so we can mine any bitasset we want even BITBTC and so on that's freaking awesomepassword for the asset u want to mine if u just want bts we can use the simple x that will work
edit didn't see it would be more of a problem to change the pass so there no other $ ! # / \ & * we can use I don't no what bts don't allow in their username or I'd throw one out there
I've added "|" as a delimiter for an asset, so try mining with the name for example: hybr1d|USD and that should work as well (instead of a space). For the record, the pool is at ~0.019 BTC so payout should be soon... (need to mine 0.01 BTC more b/c its moved in 0.01 chunks, so could be a few more hours).
thanks can't wait till everything gets figured out and is 100% operationalk it seams to be good my miner wasnt connecting so even for BTS you have to put | in so I just changed to oakmaster|BTS and it's all good now I was checking out the pool I see CNY in there so we can mine any bitasset we want even BITBTC and so on that's freaking awesomepassword for the asset u want to mine if u just want bts we can use the simple x that will work
edit didn't see it would be more of a problem to change the pass so there no other $ ! # / \ & * we can use I don't no what bts don't allow in their username or I'd throw one out there
I've added "|" as a delimiter for an asset, so try mining with the name for example: hybr1d|USD and that should work as well (instead of a space). For the record, the pool is at ~0.019 BTC so payout should be soon... (need to mine 0.01 BTC more b/c its moved in 0.01 chunks, so could be a few more hours).
I am mining for BROWNIES right now along with CNY testing.
When the pool becomes production ready more details on this will be provided.
Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
Are these the correct addresses and ports to use? Info is all over the place and I would like to help test the new pool!
Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
Are these the correct addresses and ports to use? Info is all over the place and I would like to help test the new pool!
Tried x11 with these and difficulty is set to 8. I do not see any shares being accepted.
SHA256 seems to be working well but high diff Script ports are deadI have the same problem with scrypt showing 5mh and I should be at 20-24mh when I had my rig routed through miningrigrentals as soon as I took it off and it was fine the thing is I use them cause I rent some rigs but the main thing is I'm never home so monitoring my rigs are easier this way
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4445
stratum+tcp://216.146.143.177:4445
Only showing 1.54 MH on stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449 - should be 24-25 MH
@BunkerChain Labs - www.minebitshares-comstratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449 Im using minera I have a zeus thunder X2 it seems once in awhile minera switches to a backup pool maybe because their making changes to the pool as we mine
What ports/settings are you using to mine?
I cannot replicate your speed.
I reported on more issues with the pool and they have been fixed. If you look at the dashboard display now, you can make sense of the hash data now that it is separated by protocol.
Community here has been finding issues with the development pool and fixes are being done. Awesome.
Proxy pool implementation has been refused to be delivered now despite my inquiries on it's completion.
sorry let me just give the community an HONEST update as bunker has a serious problem with honesty:
we will be making some visual changes tomorrow at bunkers request, but otherwiseDo you see how those two statements contradict each other?
the pool is production ready any time.
note: to those of you noticing a slowdown in hashing power, this may have to do
with us testing the password field for bitassets, we will update.
sorry let me just give the community an HONEST update as bunker has a serious problem with honesty:
As of now .. Bunker has gain way more trust and reputation than you.
So I'd recommend to revise you strategy with strangers, community members and
your clients.Quotewe will be making some visual changes tomorrow at bunkers request, but otherwiseDo you see how those two statements contradict each other?
the pool is production ready any time.
note: to those of you noticing a slowdown in hashing power, this may have to do
with us testing the password field for bitassets, we will update.
What has happend with proxy mining?
[11/22/2015 9:26:38 PM] Kuro: i was thinking we could give an update on your behalf and take the blame, we have been doing family stuff over the weekend but intend to launch first thing in the morning, we just need to sit down with you tomorrow morning and handle the small details during the launch
[11/22/2015 9:26:55 PM] Kuro: what time is good for you
[11/22/2015 9:27:25 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. I will be at the bunker 9:30am my time.. I have a LOT going on tomorrow though.. so I will only have some in between time
[11/22/2015 9:27:49 PM] Kuro: okay we will be on and launching around then
[11/22/2015 9:28:56 PM] Jonathan Bunker: ok.. see u then
[11/22/2015 9:29:23 PM] Kuro: do you want us to post the update?
[11/22/2015 9:31:22 PM] Jonathan Bunker: no.. at this point there is nothing else other than getting it done that is going to be satisfying... lets get the payouts out and get the mining pool updated and get going.. then see what needs to be said at that point.
@BunkerChain Labs - www.minebitshares-com
What ports/settings are you using to mine?
I cannot replicate your speed.
Sha256 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:3339Forwarded your post to @kuro112 on Skype, it's possible he put the wrong details on the site I'm not sure of them myself, so will get back to you.k thanks I have one more question if I want to mine bts I put just my name if I want bitusd I put USD after my name
Edit: Talked to Bunker, and this is the stratum he's mining on:
stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
Scrypt stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:4449
X11 stratum+tcp://mining.bunkermining.com:5559
username oakmaster USD password x
Are these the correct addresses and ports to use? Info is all over the place and I would like to help test the new pool!
Tried x11 with these and difficulty is set to 8. I do not see any shares being accepted.
x11 seems broken atm.
the proxypool software is ready to be installed and configured however bunker refuses to do it himself and is preventing its delivery for the community.
as we are software development contractors and not responsible for such things, i would look to bunker to solve these problems.
the proxypool software is ready to be installed and configured however bunker refuses to do it himself and is preventing its delivery for the community.
as we are software development contractors and not responsible for such things, i would look to bunker to solve these problems.
Item #5 on the terms of the contract which you have (committing another NDA infraction adding to the list) posted earlier, states that this feature would be implemented. That means to be put into effect and functioning. Only now have you started this narative of it being something we are responsible for installing and configuring despite over a month of chat logs and phone conversations that are contrary to this position. As well, the bottom line fact that the contract from the very beginning called on you (freebieserver) to complete this.
Actually, this narrative of it being something we have to do ourselves only began Tuesday (December 1st) where you restated everything was delivered a month ago that you claimed to "have proven that fact". I then took the positive approach and apologized, not knowing you had completed the proxy pool mining portion which had been the hold up previously, and asked if you could please send all the documentation necessary so we could input account info and start testing. It was only when I received the documentation that included this feature, did this story of 'setup yourself' start. This was shared at this update: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20350.msg262715.html#msg262715
We are here now in this public forum @kuro112 because whatever collateral I extended to you through my reputation and good faith despite the numerous excuses over the past three months that spanned blaming everything including your own team members @hybridd and @Freebieservers , has been spent.
I am not in the business of posting personal chat logs to forums. It is a serious breach of confidentiality and trust, particularly under a signed NDA agreement. So while you think you are manipulating public opinion by using edited snippets of chat logs, all you have really accomplished is destroying any trust anyone might put in ever talking to you again about anything. You have demonstrated through your own actions you cannot handle data responsibly. Regardless, what's done is done, and the consequences of such will continue for you.
I knew taking this measure would result in the monkey poop throwing palooza you seem to relish in when your contracts go undelivered. What matters most though is what I told you on December 1st.. execution. So if I had to get a little monkey poopie thrown at me so we can get you executing on the contract, sobeit. (cue an epic @Tuck Fheman meme) :)
I just want delivery for what the community paid for, and I am only excited about how much closer to that we have come in a few days. You would do well to be equally excited, and dig in to getting everything completed and in production. It would only help you.
Looking forward to seeing more progress today!
am not in the business of posting personal chat logs to forums. It is a serious breach of confidentiality and trust, particularly under a signed NDA agreement. So while you think you are manipulating public opinion by using edited snippets of chat logs, all you have really accomplished is destroying any trust anyone might put in ever talking to you again about anything. You have demonstrated through your own actions you cannot handle data responsibly. Regardless, what's done is done, and the consequences of such will continue for you.
I knew taking this measure would result in the monkey poop throwing palooza you seem to relish in when your contracts go undelivered. What matters most though is what I told you on December 1st.. execution. So if I had to get a little monkey poopie thrown at me so we can get you executing on the contract, sobeit. (cue an epic @Tuck Fheman meme) :)
ive been sitting on the sidelines here but feel it is important to recognize when there is an issue it is almost always BOTH SIDES at fault in some manner. And I take myself into account on this because i have to remind myself the same things when i have conflicts. it is one of the beautiful...yet complex aspects of being human. Still we all have to admit what is being done here in bitshares is code based...which takes time, user feedback and iterations...
please everyone lets just get back to working on this so this production seems less like lord of the flies.. :/
to those testing....THANK YOU for being productive and moving this forward while largely dodging the "monkey poo" ♡
Is this ready for production pool? nonworking X11 and nonworking stats? http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=proctologic
Server Error in '/' Application.Is this ready for production pool? nonworking X11 and nonworking stats? http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=proctologic
the stats work perfectly fine? as for x11 id ask data anout that its not up to us to configure his unomp software
Server Error in '/' Application.Is this ready for production pool? nonworking X11 and nonworking stats? http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=proctologic
the stats work perfectly fine? as for x11 id ask data anout that its not up to us to configure his unomp software
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
[12/3/2015 10:26:56 PM] Begin Cycle...
[Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00734649
[Poloniex] BTC: 0.01932096
[Poloniex] BTS: 0.00000000
don't mind me guys, just on an on topic post coming through..Quote[12/3/2015 10:26:56 PM] Begin Cycle...
[Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00734649
[Poloniex] BTC: 0.01932096
[Poloniex] BTS: 0.00000000
Once that # hits 0.01 it'll get moved, and poloniex will be > 0.02, so a payout will exec shortly after. Also that down time on the user stats was because I renamed some stuff in the DB (and forgot to re-publish the website)... oops.
x11 looks to be working again. How will payout amounts work with 2.0's higher fee's? Still daily or will the miner be able to decide?
x11 looks to be working again. How will payout amounts work with 2.0's higher fee's? Still daily or will the miner be able to decide?
[BTS Daemon] BTS: 3066.36918
[BTS Daemon] proctologic was paid 31.00000 1.3.0
[BTS Daemon] oakmaster was paid 440.00000 1.3.0
[BTS Daemon] www.minebitshares-com was paid 140.2857 1.3.535
[BTS Daemon] www.minebitshares-com was paid 3.1632 1.3.121
[BTS Daemon] www.minebitshares-com was paid 652.00000 1.3.0
[BTS Daemon] ihashfury was paid 17.00000 1.3.0
What is the proper format for X11 to mine BROWNIE.PTS?
In looking at users there appears to be a "|" separating the username and asset, but that's not what the instructions say.
So I'm looking for some clarification. Thanks!
public static char[] AddressDelimiter = new[] { ' ', '|' };
What is the proper format for X11 to mine BROWNIE.PTS?
In looking at users there appears to be a "|" separating the username and asset, but that's not what the instructions say.
So I'm looking for some clarification. Thanks!
You can use either a space or a "|", both are acceptable.Code: [Select]public static char[] AddressDelimiter = new[] { ' ', '|' };
Any plans to merge mine LTC/DOGE/VIA?
Any plans to merge mine LTC/DOGE/VIA?
Unfortunately at present the merge mining in the pool is not supported as of yet. However, we are reviewing to see if it is something we can do sooner rather than later.
Alright, I've implemented a credit system. Let me explain how it works since it will apply to some of you on the next payout cycle.
Joe is mining, but doesn't have the most hashing power in the world. For sake of simplicity, let's assume Joe wants to be paid in BTS (and not another asset). Our pool requires you to have mined a minimum of 45 BTS, since we assume transferring could cost upto 45 BTS, thus if you mine 50 BTS in a cycle, you're paid 5 BTS (50-45=5).
Joe mines a humble amount of 20 BTS per cycle.
cycle 1:
Joe mines 20 BTS.
Since Joe doesn't get paid on cycle 1, he's awarded a credit of 20 BTS.
cycle 2:
Joe mines 20 BTS
Joe has a credit of 20 BTS, so he's owed 40 BTS.
Since 40 BTS is still not a sufficient amount, Joe's credit is updated to 40 BTS.
cycle 3:
Joe mines 20 BTS.
Joe has a credit of 40 BTS, so he's owed 60 BTS.
Since 60 BTS is a sufficient amount Joe gets paid 15 BTS (60-45=15).
Fee's hurt miners with weak hashing power the most, and for this I have a possible solution to mitigate the fee-cost that I will discuss with my associates, as well as BCL.
Alright, I've implemented a credit system. Let me explain how it works since it will apply to some of you on the next payout cycle.
Joe is mining, but doesn't have the most hashing power in the world. For sake of simplicity, let's assume Joe wants to be paid in BTS (and not another asset). Our pool requires you to have mined a minimum of 45 BTS, since we assume transferring could cost upto 45 BTS, thus if you mine 50 BTS in a cycle, you're paid 5 BTS (50-45=5).
Joe mines a humble amount of 20 BTS per cycle.
cycle 1:
Joe mines 20 BTS.
Since Joe doesn't get paid on cycle 1, he's awarded a credit of 20 BTS.
cycle 2:
Joe mines 20 BTS
Joe has a credit of 20 BTS, so he's owed 40 BTS.
Since 40 BTS is still not a sufficient amount, Joe's credit is updated to 40 BTS.
cycle 3:
Joe mines 20 BTS.
Joe has a credit of 40 BTS, so he's owed 60 BTS.
Since 60 BTS is a sufficient amount Joe gets paid 15 BTS (60-45=15).
Fee's hurt miners with weak hashing power the most, and for this I have a possible solution to mitigate the fee-cost that I will discuss with my associates, as well as BCL.
Thank you. Without logging of the prior rounds mining, there would be zero point for anyone with lower hashing power to mine.
Also is there a plan to have stats like the old site with the payout profitability and details on the site?
Things are working good on my side for x11 and sha256.
the credit system is a great idea just received the first new pool payout thanks coming along goodAlright, I've implemented a credit system. Let me explain how it works since it will apply to some of you on the next payout cycle.
Joe is mining, but doesn't have the most hashing power in the world. For sake of simplicity, let's assume Joe wants to be paid in BTS (and not another asset). Our pool requires you to have mined a minimum of 45 BTS, since we assume transferring could cost upto 45 BTS, thus if you mine 50 BTS in a cycle, you're paid 5 BTS (50-45=5).
Joe mines a humble amount of 20 BTS per cycle.
cycle 1:
Joe mines 20 BTS.
Since Joe doesn't get paid on cycle 1, he's awarded a credit of 20 BTS.
cycle 2:
Joe mines 20 BTS
Joe has a credit of 20 BTS, so he's owed 40 BTS.
Since 40 BTS is still not a sufficient amount, Joe's credit is updated to 40 BTS.
cycle 3:
Joe mines 20 BTS.
Joe has a credit of 40 BTS, so he's owed 60 BTS.
Since 60 BTS is a sufficient amount Joe gets paid 15 BTS (60-45=15).
Fee's hurt miners with weak hashing power the most, and for this I have a possible solution to mitigate the fee-cost that I will discuss with my associates, as well as BCL.
Thank you. Without logging of the prior rounds mining, there would be zero point for anyone with lower hashing power to mine.
Also is there a plan to have stats like the old site with the payout profitability and details on the site?
Things are working good on my side for x11 and sha256.
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=www.minebitshares-com
if you see 0 for a prediction it doesn't necessarily mean 0, but more so indeterminate -- keep in mind these are estimates so they're not necessarily super accurate.
How long do you need to be mining until you see stats? When I click my miner http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=pba2%20BTS (http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=pba2%20BTS) i'm not seeing anything.
Thanks!How long do you need to be mining until you see stats? When I click my miner http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=pba2%20BTS (http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=pba2%20BTS) i'm not seeing anything.
Just use http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=pba2
You don't need to specify the currency.
One more question... is there a higher difficulty port available for X11? I'm not able to mine properly at port 5559.
I'm not sure how to post the log; i'm using Nicehash to mine. According to their pool verificatior the pool was showing as incompatible because the difficulty was too low. But I just checked again and now it seems ok.One more question... is there a higher difficulty port available for X11? I'm not able to mine properly at port 5559.
Can you post log whats happening?
I'm not sure how to post the log; i'm using Nicehash to mine. According to their pool verificatior the pool was showing as incompatible because the difficulty was too low. But I just checked again and now it seems ok.One more question... is there a higher difficulty port available for X11? I'm not able to mine properly at port 5559.
Can you post log whats happening?
Status Update
No more payouts from the previous pool today were requested.
Our first automated payouts got processed today and in that discovered a bug that prevents the proper payout in some circumstances. A fix was applied and we wait to see in the next payout if it worked.
We had #10 item on the list of things that needed to be completed delivered. If you login to your User stats page, you can now get an estimate of how much you will be paid during the next payout in your respective currency. Will continue to test it.
We got merge mining setup and are exploring possibilities of somehow including it as part of the payouts.
Much more to come!
Keep on mining and giving us feedback on everything. If you have any issues let us know!
Thanks to everyone!
May I suggest you close this thread? "Emergency Measures: Temporary Shutdown" is not what everyone wants to see on top of the BitShares discussion board.
there is some port and diffchanges so please look at this list and choose correct port and restart miners
SHA256
Normal Vardiff
Port 3339
minDiff:128
maxDiff:8192
High Vardiff
Port 3338
minDiff:8192,
maxDiff:16384
Low Vardiff
Port 3337
minDiff:8
maxDiff:128
Scrypt
Low Vardiff
Port 4449
minDiff:128
maxDiff:4096
Normal Vardiff
Port 4448
minDiff:4096,
maxDiff:8192
High Vardiff
Port 4444
minDiff:8192,
maxDiff:16284
Fixed Diff 2048 for TITAN
Port 4447
Diff:2048
Fixed Diff 512
Port 4446
diff:512
Fixed Diff 1024
Port 4445
diff:1024
X11
Normal Vardiff
Port 5559
minDiff:0.0001
maxDiff:1
Some recommendations
SCRYPT
Below 500KH: 32
500+: 64
1000+: 128
2000+: 256
3000+: 384
5000+: 512
10000+: 1024
25000+: 2048
50000+: 4096
100000+: 8192
250000+: 16284
SHA-256 coins:
1-100GH: 8
100GH-500GH: 256
500GH-1TH: 512
1TH+: 1024
Can we please get more testing in SHA256 it would be great.my sha256 rig is rented once it done all through back on the only thing right now I'm seeing is the estimated payouts is all over the place one minute it says 400 bts than a hr later 13 bts than it'll jump to 1400 bts does it reset it self everytime the coin switches other than that I didn't have any other issues good work thanksthere is some port and diffchanges so please look at this list and choose correct port and restart miners
SHA256
Normal Vardiff
Port 3339
minDiff:128
maxDiff:8192
High Vardiff
Port 3338
minDiff:8192,
maxDiff:16384
Low Vardiff
Port 3337
minDiff:8
maxDiff:128
Scrypt
Low Vardiff
Port 4449
minDiff:128
maxDiff:4096
Normal Vardiff
Port 4448
minDiff:4096,
maxDiff:8192
High Vardiff
Port 4444
minDiff:8192,
maxDiff:16284
Fixed Diff 2048 for TITAN
Port 4447
Diff:2048
Fixed Diff 512
Port 4446
diff:512
Fixed Diff 1024
Port 4445
diff:1024
X11
Normal Vardiff
Port 5559
minDiff:0.0001
maxDiff:1
Some recommendations
SCRYPT
Below 500KH: 32
500+: 64
1000+: 128
2000+: 256
3000+: 384
5000+: 512
10000+: 1024
25000+: 2048
50000+: 4096
100000+: 8192
250000+: 16284
SHA-256 coins:
1-100GH: 8
100GH-500GH: 256
500GH-1TH: 512
1TH+: 1024
May I suggest you close this thread? "Emergency Measures: Temporary Shutdown" is not what everyone wants to see on top of the BitShares discussion board.
May I suggest you close this thread? "Emergency Measures: Temporary Shutdown" is not what everyone wants to see on top of the BitShares discussion board.
+5%
or at least rename it!
New fixed ports added for NiceHash. Please try them.
X11
Normal Vardiff
Port 5559
minDiff:0.001
maxDiff:1
NiceHash Fixed Diff
Port 5558
diff:0.2
Using port 5559 for Nicehash's X11 algo has been working fine for me and port 4448 for scrypt.New fixed ports added for NiceHash. Please try them.
X11
Normal Vardiff
Port 5559
minDiff:0.001
maxDiff:1
NiceHash Fixed Diff
Port 5558
diff:0.2
What's the reason to choose one or the other for x11?
Using port 5559 for Nicehash's X11 algo has been working fine for me and port 4448 for scrypt.New fixed ports added for NiceHash. Please try them.
X11
Normal Vardiff
Port 5559
minDiff:0.001
maxDiff:1
NiceHash Fixed Diff
Port 5558
diff:0.2
What's the reason to choose one or the other for x11?
What's up with X11?
No one is getting payouts, and the payout estimates are all at almost nothing.What's up with X11?
Sorry can you be more specific? What kind of issue are you having with x11?
+5% +5%No one is getting payouts, and the payout estimates are all at almost nothing.What's up with X11?
Sorry can you be more specific? What kind of issue are you having with x11?
Payouts have been occuring, however Bunker has made the decision that the shares your miner has acquired will only be grouped against miners mining the same algorithm. We'll be implementing this change soon.
To walk you through this, suppose theres are 3 miners and these are their respective shares (hypothetical numbers to make calculations easy):
algo coin name shares
x11 startcoin joe 10
x11 startcoin sam 5
scrypt casinocoin joe 100
Suppose the 0.04 BTC threshold is hit
Current Way
joe = (0.04 * (100+10)/115) / BTC_PER_BTS
sam = (0.04 * 5/115) / BTC_PER_BTS
Changes to be made
0.02 BTC of which is from x11, and 0.02 BTC of which is from scrypt.
joe = ((0.02 * 100/100) + (0.02 * 10/15)) / BTC_PER_BTS
sam = ((0.02 * 0/100) + (0.02 5/15)) / BTC_PER_BTS
tl;dr for those of you since math is apparently hard and don't understand the phrase "hypothetical numbers":
x11 miners get paid based on x11 coins mined
scrypt miners get paid based on scrypt coins mined
sha256 miners get paid based on sha256 coins mined
this change has not been made live yet.
http://216.146.143.200/dashboard/index
Index page updated to reflect the current BTC totals of each algorithm (resets after a payout).
Predictability shown in user-panel reflects the current worth of your miner(s), this resets every time a payout completes. -- Should be way more accurate than before!
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=www.minebitshares-com
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=generator (x11 miner)
We've changed the way users stats is displayed. It will show you all of the shares you own since the last payout, and tell you how much of the shares you own %-wise.It appears that the .04btc payout limit is per algo? Was thinking it would be total for pool… Though i am unsure what is the most fair.
Payouts have been adjusted to now occur at 0.04 BTC.
An estimate can be calculated like this:
BTS = 0.04 BTC / RATE_BTC_BTS * %-Holding
i.e. if you hold 10% of all shares since the last payout, and suppose the current market value of BTS is 0.00000920,
BTS = 0.04 / 0.00000920 * 0.10 = 434.7826
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=www.minebitshares-com
[Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00968221
[Unomp] scrypt BTC: 0.0345651
[Unomp] x11 BTC: 0.01591743
[Unomp] sha256 BTC: 0.0026986
[Poloniex] BTC: 0.03645680
It is 0.04 for the entire pool, unfortunately, cryptsy is being very slow with withdrawals =/Ok. Cool. No problem. Just so long as i know. Thank you.
We liquidate alts at Cryptsy, and buy the BTS over at Poloniex.Quote[Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00968221
[Unomp] scrypt BTC: 0.0345651
[Unomp] x11 BTC: 0.01591743
[Unomp] sha256 BTC: 0.0026986
[Poloniex] BTC: 0.03645680
There's a pending withdrawal for 0.01 from C->P still currently.
It is 0.04 for the entire pool, unfortunately, cryptsy is being very slow with withdrawals =/Is it possible to use a different exchange other than Cryptsy? https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/cryptsys-bitcoin-withdrawal-troubles-continue/ (https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/cryptsys-bitcoin-withdrawal-troubles-continue/)
We liquidate alts at Cryptsy move the BTC to Poloniex and then buy the BTS.Quote[Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00968221
[Unomp] scrypt BTC: 0.0345651
[Unomp] x11 BTC: 0.01591743
[Unomp] sha256 BTC: 0.0026986
[Poloniex] BTC: 0.03645680
It is 0.04 for the entire pool, unfortunately, cryptsy is being very slow with withdrawals =/Ok. Cool. No problem. Just so long as i know. Thank you.
We liquidate alts at Cryptsy, and buy the BTS over at Poloniex.Quote[Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00968221
[Unomp] scrypt BTC: 0.0345651
[Unomp] x11 BTC: 0.01591743
[Unomp] sha256 BTC: 0.0026986
[Poloniex] BTC: 0.03645680
There's a pending withdrawal for 0.01 from C->P still currently.
It is 0.04 for the entire pool, unfortunately, cryptsy is being very slow with withdrawals =/Is it possible to use a different exchange other than Cryptsy? https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/cryptsys-bitcoin-withdrawal-troubles-continue/ (https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/cryptsys-bitcoin-withdrawal-troubles-continue/)
We liquidate alts at Cryptsy move the BTC to Poloniex and then buy the BTS.Quote[Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00968221
[Unomp] scrypt BTC: 0.0345651
[Unomp] x11 BTC: 0.01591743
[Unomp] sha256 BTC: 0.0026986
[Poloniex] BTC: 0.03645680
Perhaps Bittrex?
http://216.146.143.200/dashboard/index
Index page updated to reflect the current BTC totals of each algorithm (resets after a payout).
Predictability shown in user-panel reflects the current worth of your miner(s), this resets every time a payout completes. -- Should be way more accurate than before!
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=www.minebitshares-com
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=generator (x11 miner)
Nice improvement. Any other plans to share on the future of the pool? The previous one was interesting because you ran the delegates to provide a bonus, what's the plan to make this one extra profitable?
Status Update
Those of you mining may have noticed that payouts have gone past the threshold that we set for the pool. This is due to cryptsy delaying the transfer of BTC out of their exchange. There have been a whirlwind of other accusations related to cryptsy payouts including class actions.
Some of our more profitable coins were only on cryptsy, but there isn't more profit when you simply are not getting paid out.
I decided that we would cut our losses, and use what coins we can, and a few new ones that we can exchange at Poloniex, and Bittrex.
Between these two exchanges, we currently have about 17 coins between all three algos that the pool currently supports. In addition to this, we also have enabled merge mining with DOGE. We are working out a way to make this part of the bonus payout.
The migration has not been completed yet. As you can see, after we had updated all the wallets and the config for the pool it appears all our charts suddenly stopped working. This has been reported to @Freebieservers along with the updated deposit addresses to start being directed at the other exchanges. If you ignore the charts you can see from the workers below on the Dashboard the current coins that are being mined.
Hopefully we will see the payout make its way out of crytpsy, but we aren't holding out a lot of hope given all the accusations and the shrinking volume happening there.
Please continue to test the pool and report any other issues you are finding, or things missing that you think should be there in regards to features and/or reporting. If you have been mining elsewhere while we are still in development and have seen some good success with other coins, also feel free to share and we can consider adding those to the pool if they are available for exchange on Polo/Bittrex.
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Code: [Select]Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Actually getting this error msg on the payout page.
k so that's why I only received a small payout after mining for 5 days without one is because craptsy is holding up withdrawals it not your fault thanks for the updates it sucks cause it just seemed everything was going well that the exchange had to get us outside of that the ports I'm running on seem to be good
Still need to update the "getting started" page with x11 and sha256 instructions.Seems I overlooked this, I'll look into this in the morning, thx.
Status Update
Those of you mining may have noticed that payouts have gone past the threshold that we set for the pool. This is due to cryptsy delaying the transfer of BTC out of their exchange. There have been a whirlwind of other accusations related to cryptsy payouts including class actions.
Some of our more profitable coins were only on cryptsy, but there isn't more profit when you simply are not getting paid out.
I decided that we would cut our losses, and use what coins we can, and a few new ones that we can exchange at Poloniex, and Bittrex.
Between these two exchanges, we currently have about 17 coins between all three algos that the pool currently supports. In addition to this, we also have enabled merge mining with DOGE. We are working out a way to make this part of the bonus payout.
The migration has not been completed yet. As you can see, after we had updated all the wallets and the config for the pool it appears all our charts suddenly stopped working. This has been reported to @Freebieservers along with the updated deposit addresses to start being directed at the other exchanges. If you ignore the charts you can see from the workers below on the Dashboard the current coins that are being mined.
Hopefully we will see the payout make its way out of crytpsy, but we aren't holding out a lot of hope given all the accusations and the shrinking volume happening there.
Please continue to test the pool and report any other issues you are finding, or things missing that you think should be there in regards to features and/or reporting. If you have been mining elsewhere while we are still in development and have seen some good success with other coins, also feel free to share and we can consider adding those to the pool if they are available for exchange on Polo/Bittrex.
that's what I thought it sucks that this is happening with cryptsy they support a large amount of alts and have been around for awhile makes you wonder what's going to happen with all the coins that rely on them for being their only exchange if cryptsy goes underk so that's why I only received a small payout after mining for 5 days without one is because craptsy is holding up withdrawals it not your fault thanks for the updates it sucks cause it just seemed everything was going well that the exchange had to get us outside of that the ports I'm running on seem to be good
Yeah that's correct. We have really around 0.1 BTC to be distributed, but about 0.06-0.07 BTC of that is being held by Cryptsy. The distribution that happened today was only worth around 0.036 BTC.
It looks like the modified payment model is indeed working... it's just unfortunate that Cryptsy is in the position it's currently in. We've eliminated using them entirely from out system now.Still need to update the "getting started" page with x11 and sha256 instructions.Seems I overlooked this, I'll look into this in the morning, thx.
that's what I thought it sucks that this is happening with cryptsy they support a large amount of alts and have been around for awhile makes you wonder what's going to happen with all the coins that rely on them for being their only exchange if cryptsy goes underk so that's why I only received a small payout after mining for 5 days without one is because craptsy is holding up withdrawals it not your fault thanks for the updates it sucks cause it just seemed everything was going well that the exchange had to get us outside of that the ports I'm running on seem to be good
Yeah that's correct. We have really around 0.1 BTC to be distributed, but about 0.06-0.07 BTC of that is being held by Cryptsy. The distribution that happened today was only worth around 0.036 BTC.
It looks like the modified payment model is indeed working... it's just unfortunate that Cryptsy is in the position it's currently in. We've eliminated using them entirely from out system now.Still need to update the "getting started" page with x11 and sha256 instructions.Seems I overlooked this, I'll look into this in the morning, thx.
that's a good point I guess this is a way to clean up a little there's no reason why there's 200 to 300 different alts when most of them are copy and paste code with nothing different to offerthat's what I thought it sucks that this is happening with cryptsy they support a large amount of alts and have been around for awhile makes you wonder what's going to happen with all the coins that rely on them for being their only exchange if cryptsy goes underk so that's why I only received a small payout after mining for 5 days without one is because craptsy is holding up withdrawals it not your fault thanks for the updates it sucks cause it just seemed everything was going well that the exchange had to get us outside of that the ports I'm running on seem to be good
Yeah that's correct. We have really around 0.1 BTC to be distributed, but about 0.06-0.07 BTC of that is being held by Cryptsy. The distribution that happened today was only worth around 0.036 BTC.
It looks like the modified payment model is indeed working... it's just unfortunate that Cryptsy is in the position it's currently in. We've eliminated using them entirely from out system now.Still need to update the "getting started" page with x11 and sha256 instructions.Seems I overlooked this, I'll look into this in the morning, thx.
Many of those alts are very low volume, which is why they only have Cyrptsy left.
just one more thing I noticed on the getting started page there's a typo under sha for normal diff there 8192 for the port it's 3339
k either I'm going crazy or it's been changed the other day when I was looking at the getting started for the different ports the norm diff for sha256 said 8192 but anyway I think the pool running great I haven't had no issues connecting or with hashrate outside of the issue with cryptsy seems payments are running good you guys did a good job getting it up and running seems any little glitches that where found was fixed petty quickjust one more thing I noticed on the getting started page there's a typo under sha for normal diff there 8192 for the port it's 3339
where do you see that?
k either I'm going crazy or it's been changed the other day when I was looking at the getting started for the different ports the norm diff for sha256 said 8192 but anyway I think the pool running great I haven't had no issues connecting or with hashrate outside of the issue with cryptsy seems payments are running good you guys did a good job getting it up and running seems any little glitches that where found was fixed petty quickjust one more thing I noticed on the getting started page there's a typo under sha for normal diff there 8192 for the port it's 3339
where do you see that?
Thank you for getting in touch with us.
Most BTC LTC and BTCD withdrawals are currently extremely slow moving due to tech issues. This progressively got worse over the past week and were trying to find the reason they are not going out. Please understand that due to extremely high security this a very complex system and the problem is still being resolved.
We appreciate your patience and understanding on this matter. Should you wish to cancel your pending withdraw, please let us know.
we need a little more hash on sha256 I don't think I'm doing anything by myself it sucks cause I sold my antminers s1's and my s2 cause the power to profit was worth it if I still had them they all would be at bunkermining
is there anyway to forward the hash to nicehash at least this way even if there's only a few ppl hashing on sha but altogether it's still a low hashrate there can still be a payment cause nicehash pays for every accepted share just I thought I'm not a programmer so I don't no if it's a lot of work but if it isn't than even the guys with USB sticks can collect a few bts than when our rate goes up it'll swith to regular coinswe need a little more hash on sha256 I don't think I'm doing anything by myself it sucks cause I sold my antminers s1's and my s2 cause the power to profit was worth it if I still had them they all would be at bunkermining
Feel free to recommend low diff sha256 coins to add to pool as its not producing any blocks with this low hashrate.
is there anyway to forward the hash to nicehash at least this way even if there's only a few ppl hashing on sha but altogether it's still a low hashrate there can still be a payment cause nicehash pays for every accepted share just I thought I'm not a programmer so I don't no if it's a lot of work but if it isn't than even the guys with USB sticks can collect a few bts than when our rate goes up it'll swith to regular coinswe need a little more hash on sha256 I don't think I'm doing anything by myself it sucks cause I sold my antminers s1's and my s2 cause the power to profit was worth it if I still had them they all would be at bunkermining
Feel free to recommend low diff sha256 coins to add to pool as its not producing any blocks with this low hashrate.
Status Update
All the mining has now moved to mining.bunkermining.com and is no longer functional on the IP address that was posted here.
The operation caused some downtime due to DNS propagation issues, but it was done within about 30 minutes total.
If you haven't updated your configurations please do so now to resume your testing.
We had some challenges in the switch over. We will continue to monitor the situation and make fixes as needed.
sounds good I figured that being the pool not really be advertised so there's really not a lot of hash right now once it's ready I'm sure some more ppl with sha rigs will be on I'm just waiting till after the holidays are over than I have plans to retire my rig I have now and get a s7 that I'll run here thanks for the update I'm sure this pool will be a successis there anyway to forward the hash to nicehash at least this way even if there's only a few ppl hashing on sha but altogether it's still a low hashrate there can still be a payment cause nicehash pays for every accepted share just I thought I'm not a programmer so I don't no if it's a lot of work but if it isn't than even the guys with USB sticks can collect a few bts than when our rate goes up it'll swith to regular coinswe need a little more hash on sha256 I don't think I'm doing anything by myself it sucks cause I sold my antminers s1's and my s2 cause the power to profit was worth it if I still had them they all would be at bunkermining
Feel free to recommend low diff sha256 coins to add to pool as its not producing any blocks with this low hashrate.
Unfortunately this was one of our feature parameters of the contract for the mining pool that will not be fulfilled by freebieserver.
Keep in mind though that we are ONLY TESTING right now. We have not gone into production. We are also only in an early version for the pool that will have many more things to come in the near future.
Once we go into production, we can start to publicly invite anyone to mine the pool and we should have our hash rates increase. I know that there are many with sha256 who are just waiting for us to be finished.
I also plan to buy some hashing power from these rig leasing places when we get started to help prop up the hash of the pool for a little while until we get word spreading.
Any update on payouts? Still issues with Poloniex updating their wallet?
OPERATION INFO DATE
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,447.73856 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 16 hours ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,558.82471 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 20 hours ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,377.22542 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com yesterday
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,468.4435 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 2 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,429.97206 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 2 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,405.02365 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 2 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,619.05827 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,562.14475 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,540.8454 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 2,000.88592 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,782.39623 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,289.66 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,275.77144 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,314.46869 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,355.5806 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,314.33094 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,281.04836 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,466.11368 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 5 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,367.57474 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 7 days ago
TRANSFERAny update on payouts? Still issues with Poloniex updating their wallet?
Last payout received 7 days ago. Meanwhile:
https://bitshares.openledger.info/?r=cryptofresh#/account/minebts1.bunkermining-com/overview/ (https://bitshares.openledger.info/?r=cryptofresh#/account/minebts1.bunkermining-com/overview/)Code: [Select]OPERATION INFO DATE
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,447.73856 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 16 hours ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,558.82471 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 20 hours ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,377.22542 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com yesterday
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,468.4435 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 2 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,429.97206 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 2 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,405.02365 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 2 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,619.05827 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,562.14475 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,540.8454 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 2,000.88592 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,782.39623 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 3 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,289.66 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,275.77144 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,314.46869 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,355.5806 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,314.33094 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,281.04836 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 4 days ago
TRANSFER bittrex-deposit sent 1,466.11368 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 5 days ago
TRANSFER poloniexwallet sent 1,367.57474 BTS to minebts1.bunkermining-com 7 days ago
TRANSFER
Interested in update also.
neither of those delimeter's work for me. Is a "period" acceptable?What is the proper format for X11 to mine BROWNIE.PTS?
In looking at users there appears to be a "|" separating the username and asset, but that's not what the instructions say.
So I'm looking for some clarification. Thanks!
You can use either a space or a "|", both are acceptable.Code: [Select]public static char[] AddressDelimiter = new[] { ' ', '|' };
ty!
Any updates on the progress of the pool? I have not seen payouts in a few days.
Can i get som help on mining SHA256 here :-*
We are getting blocks, but no payouts yet for the SHA256. Bittrex is showing more than enough volume to have gotten the conversions/sales done. Is there a certain number of blocks needed to make it worth payout?
Everything ok with the payouts? According to the website, a few payouts are not showing up in the wallet even though they are indicated on the website.
These seem to be skipped:
BTS brekyrse1f3 1174.62592118 4/6/2016 9:21:35 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 312.92976694 4/6/2016 6:47:31 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 289.77028151 2/24/2016 10:37:29 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 177.43976024 1/10/2016 11:09:19 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 77.08215620 1/6/2016 4:21:26 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 118.85506832 1/6/2016 6:16:54 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 74.32134320 1/4/2016 12:36:19 AM
I need to check the following when I get home, not sure if the "recent history" includes these or not since they are old. They also do not show up on CryptoFresh.
BTS brekyrse1f3 137.41309900 12/23/2015 10:57:38 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 1064.18212841 12/22/2015 1:04:47 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 233.54878255 12/20/2015 6:36:02 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 488.44238237 12/19/2015 1:19:23 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 765.26706888 12/17/2015 12:41:03 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 766.43377861 12/16/2015 10:31:40 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 403.46890751 12/15/2015 12:40:40 AM
Everything ok with the payouts? According to the website, a few payouts are not showing up in the wallet even though they are indicated on the website.
These seem to be skipped:
BTS brekyrse1f3 1174.62592118 4/6/2016 9:21:35 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 312.92976694 4/6/2016 6:47:31 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 289.77028151 2/24/2016 10:37:29 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 177.43976024 1/10/2016 11:09:19 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 77.08215620 1/6/2016 4:21:26 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 118.85506832 1/6/2016 6:16:54 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 74.32134320 1/4/2016 12:36:19 AM
I need to check the following when I get home, not sure if the "recent history" includes these or not since they are old. They also do not show up on CryptoFresh.
BTS brekyrse1f3 137.41309900 12/23/2015 10:57:38 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 1064.18212841 12/22/2015 1:04:47 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 233.54878255 12/20/2015 6:36:02 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 488.44238237 12/19/2015 1:19:23 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 765.26706888 12/17/2015 12:41:03 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 766.43377861 12/16/2015 10:31:40 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 403.46890751 12/15/2015 12:40:40 AM
This issue has been brought to the attention of the devs.
Everything ok with the payouts? According to the website, a few payouts are not showing up in the wallet even though they are indicated on the website.
These seem to be skipped:
BTS brekyrse1f3 1174.62592118 4/6/2016 9:21:35 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 312.92976694 4/6/2016 6:47:31 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 289.77028151 2/24/2016 10:37:29 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 177.43976024 1/10/2016 11:09:19 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 77.08215620 1/6/2016 4:21:26 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 118.85506832 1/6/2016 6:16:54 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 74.32134320 1/4/2016 12:36:19 AM
I need to check the following when I get home, not sure if the "recent history" includes these or not since they are old. They also do not show up on CryptoFresh.
BTS brekyrse1f3 137.41309900 12/23/2015 10:57:38 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 1064.18212841 12/22/2015 1:04:47 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 233.54878255 12/20/2015 6:36:02 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 488.44238237 12/19/2015 1:19:23 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 765.26706888 12/17/2015 12:41:03 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 766.43377861 12/16/2015 10:31:40 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 403.46890751 12/15/2015 12:40:40 AM
This issue has been brought to the attention of the devs.
Any insight into this?
I've been buried in work and just realized the pool is down just wondering what's going on
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk