Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Chris4210

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 29
151
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] BlockPay -Your favorite store can now accept any crypto thanx to Bitshares
« on: September 29, 2016, 11:41:24 am »
Quote from: kenCode on September 27, 2016, 08:21:52 am
BlockPay - Day 2 of 4 at Oktoberfest and Bits & Pretzels events (some very sexy photos)
https://steemit.com/crypto-news/@kenCode/blockpay-day-2-of-4-at-oktoberfest-and-bits-and-pretzels-events
edit: a better link: http://steem.link/Rh3PC
 
Erik Voorhees (Shapeshift), @Chris4210 @kenCode and more:


We had a fun night with the local Blockchain community and some great international guest!! Thank you all for coming over to Wirtshaus am Bavariapark!  +5%

152
General Discussion / Re: [ANN - Pre-ICO] BlockPay - Zero Cost, digital currency Point-Of-Sale systems
« on: September 19, 2016, 08:14:47 am »
BlockPay “S” is out now!





153
General Discussion / Re: Should the Bitshares committee surrender overreaching MPA permissions?
« on: September 18, 2016, 03:00:02 pm »
Quote from: crypto123 on September 18, 2016, 01:20:15 pm
Potentially the 'override_authority: Issuer may transfer asset back to himself' permission could be used to recover an MPA from a black swan event/state.

Yes, that would be a good but extreme example for that. I would like to keep these options as they are today and make a better decision down the road. We still have a long way to go with the DEX and we don´t know how the future will look like in 3-4 years. Many features that we have today are not fully working yet due to lack of liquidity. I think it would be wrong to surrender so early.

154
General Discussion / Re: Raising the quantity of BTS witnesses & the introduction of vote degradation?
« on: September 16, 2016, 09:48:49 pm »
I like the idea of accountability too. It is very sad to see so few witnesses assisting the Gridcoin MPA, it should be easy to do and we will have more and more communities coming onboard so we need an active set of witnesses.

I am watching the Witness report on Steem and I really like the effort. Unfortunately, It requires a lot of time and effort to kick that off. If the report can be posted on Steem, the analyst would get at least a compensation for his work.

Are we missing the right tools for voting or just the reporting?

@crypto123 which two witness are supporting you right now? Lets give them a push in votes!


155
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Special Drawing Rights as a Smartcoin - hear me out ...
« on: September 16, 2016, 09:40:43 pm »
Quote from: karnal on September 16, 2016, 05:48:06 pm
Who do I have to shoot around here to get a witness to pay attention? (hah! LOL! .. ahem)
Is there no witness channel for them? Maybe it got a bit dusted because we did not do any hf in a long time anymore.

For the BitXDR
Cost to create: 1,174,108 BTS   234,822 BTS*LT (6,549 USD   1,310 USD*)
Managed by: Committee (?)
Paid by: crowdfunded
Set up by: Xeroc?, ABit?
Witness source: http://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=XDR&To=EUR
MPA parameters: standard bitUSD

Purpose: ?

156
Technical Support / Re: Smartcoins yield: Yay / Nay ?
« on: September 16, 2016, 09:29:26 pm »
Reading most of the comments, I also agree with Karnal conclusion.

Most BitAsset currencies are for value protection and interest free.

BitAssets holder can decide to invest their funds into Marketmaker Funds, or other investment vehicles to earn an interest.

Sure it would be nice to earn 10% out of nothing but the 10%+(profit) need to be earned from someone, somewhere. We could think more about a Steem model of super inflation which still has to prove itself. Or we think about proven investment instruments who generate profits.


157
General Discussion / Re: Announcing CONSTRUCTION token. Deadline 15th October
« on: September 16, 2016, 09:01:19 pm »
I like how the UIA are used here to help out fund a project. You said that the funds and their return are secured through the local municipal? 11% is quite an interest. Why so expensive?

Also, the road seems almost finished. How much of the 150k has been spent already?


158
General Discussion / Re: Should the Bitshares committee surrender overreaching MPA permissions?
« on: September 16, 2016, 08:14:01 pm »
Please correct me if I am wrong but you can only change these features once right? So if we surrender these features today we cannot turn them back again, right? So if we change them we can not adjust to any future market conditions where we might use these features.

That would be almost like the block size debate in Bitcoin. I would prefer a more flexible system.

159
General Discussion / Re: Has the settlement price been removed from the Exchange view in OL?
« on: September 16, 2016, 06:20:50 pm »
I noticed that too. I think that has been removed.

160
General Discussion / Re: telegram channel issue.
« on: September 13, 2016, 08:32:37 am »
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on September 13, 2016, 07:58:29 am
I'm still locked out from the telegram group since it was turned in to a supergroup.

This is the error I get:

Method: messages.sendMessage
Url: N/A
Result: {"_":"rpc_error","error_code":400,"error_message":"PEER_ID_INVALID"}
Stack: Error
    at Object.h [as invokeApi] (https://web.telegram.org/js/app.js:23:25735)
    at Z.l.send (https://web.telegram.org/js/app.js:29:5996)
    at n (https://web.telegram.org/js/app.js:2:17056)

Have you tried to create a new Telegram account and log into the chat? Maybe you should contact the Telegram support what to do here? Ofc we want you back Jonny!!

161
General Discussion / Re: Steem dollar is more liquid than BitUSD. We should copy it's key feature.
« on: September 12, 2016, 08:56:27 am »
Quote from: ripplexiaoshan on September 09, 2016, 05:11:16 pm
Quote from: bitcrab on September 05, 2016, 08:37:11 am
there is a problem: does the market has bitUSD demand?

I have expected that the bitUSD liquidity would rise obviously after the parameter change, but seems I was wrong.

now it is safe enough to generate bitUSD by shorting, but seems few people like to use this leverage tool, weird.

Hopefully, BlockPay will change this situation. @Chris4210

Yes, this is an important issue that I will focus on now. We need to consider any kind of liq program that could work for us.

The challenge here is really that even when we have 16 mio BTS right now, we only can create around 40k USD in total. So we need to think about additional ways how to create more liquidity and learn from the BitCNY approach.








162
General Discussion / Re: [Video] Bitshares Inflation Rate
« on: September 08, 2016, 08:30:49 pm »
I like the effort. Will also vote for this worker  +5%

163
General Discussion / Re: [ANN - Pre-ICO] BlockPay - Zero Cost, digital currency Point-Of-Sale systems
« on: September 05, 2016, 10:21:57 am »
BlockPay Pre-ICO Ended after 13 days, 75% sold, and more than 1095 BTC raised!

Thank you all for the great support! Please find my latest update here: https://steemit.com/steem/@Chris4210/blockpay-pre-ico-ended-after-13-days-75-sold-and-more-than-1095-btc-raised

164
General Discussion / Re: Cryptofresh API
« on: September 03, 2016, 01:22:23 pm »
If @roadscape is not active anymore then we need to create a second blockchain explorer for Bitshares?

165
General Discussion / Re: Bittwenty (index fund) is almost alive ! Witness opportunity !
« on: September 03, 2016, 01:20:36 pm »
Thank you for your great work EstefanTT, I want to try this new index fund.  What is the ticker for it?

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 29

Page created in 0.179 seconds with 21 queries.