Asking BM to Open More Committee Member Positions

[clayop]

clayop, why are BitCrab and clayop no longer on the list of active committee members?

https://bitshares.openledger.info/#/explorer/committee-members

I checked earlier today and you were both there?

Also, explain clearly how people can support lower (or higher) fees via voting, step by step.
I think a lot of shareholders have an opinion but aren't familiar with how to vote for it.

Because bitcrab forgot to vote for them. He starts to encourage Chinese community to vote so we may see many changes in the future.

[Empirical1.2]

clayop, why are BitCrab and clayop no longer on the list of active committee members?

https://bitshares.openledger.info/#/explorer/committee-members

I checked earlier today and you were both there?

Also, explain clearly how people can support lower (or higher) fees via voting, step by step.
I think a lot of shareholders have an opinion but aren't familiar with how to vote for it. 

[clayop]

Regarding recent fee debate, I found that the core cause of the problem is too few committee positions are open to public.
While significant number of votes are given to bitcrab (125 mil) and me (104 mil), it is hard to reflect supporter's opinion to the BTS system because committee council is dominated by init accounts.
@bytemaster Can you open some more positions to the public to resolve this endless debate? IMHO, the community should have at least six seats.