Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I recommend you look into pybitshares.comA transfer is an "operation". You can bundle many operations into a single transaction, however, you still need to pay the transfer fee for every single operation. To construct such a transaction, do you prefer to use python, JS or rather talk to the cli_wallet API?
Hello Xeroc. We will have the same need to send many BTS, UIA and others to several users. Could you help me to find more info about how to do that? I will appreciate that.
With cli_wallet API you mean using the BitShares wallet?
Thanks a lot.
Blaming this on the witnesses is short-sighted and unfair IMO.I agree with @pc
Technically, we would first need to write a BSIP that describes the behavior and reasoning behind it ... then get that proposal approved like usual.
On a side node: The same proposal also creates a worker "threshold-bsip" which refunds 1 BTS per day.
The purpose is to have an independent worker proposal to consider BSIPs approved. There will be a separate
announcement to this one.
Any update for "threshold-bsip"? The worker proposal is listed but seems like committee members not aware of this and not many proxies vote for it, only 16,024,026 Votes so far.
I disagree.I understand your disagreement and I would prefer high quality exchanges as well. All I am doing is trying to
HitBTC is an exchange which is doable but it needs time and communication.I started together with matle85 to talk to HitBTC and they seem to be interrested but they are working slow.
Nobody even tried to contact HitBTC or any similar seize of exchange as it is way more difficult and more time consuming instead we got offers from exchanges which main income are listing fee's instead of trading fee's.
I get bombarded weekly with offers from IDAX,LAtoken,IDCM etc asking to list a coin on their exchange for a listing fee with discount.
I think it's a good thing for BTS if any CEX want to participate community more deeply, they can really care about BTS community.
And it's acceptable for me any CEX can vote, only when they have a clearly notification to each BTS trader, something like: "I will vote with your shares, if you don't agree my choise, don't trade in my exchange."
it's a cheating if they didn't mention clearly.
what I really care about is not who vote, but if these share owners who involved the vote have their own brain.
It's a bad thing if the CEX's customers give their vote power to CEX but without their own brain. they didn't care about what they vote.
Just as bad as sometimes some proxy said " I didn't known how it work, but I trust xxx, so I voted".
It's acceptable for me anybody can make any mistake because of knowledge limit. but it's not acceptable for me that all others support the mistake without brain.
I saw zb have already involved the vote, wish they will really help BTS growth, and give a clear notification about vote in the website.
Will HTLC make BSIP46 obsolete? (https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/pull/111)Not really .. and HTLC only has two parties. An escrow may have three parties (and additional mediator)
Feed price= (Median of witness feeds+DEX price)/2;Then, your only source of information is the internal price and the external becomes irrelevant.
