46
General Discussion / Re: October 2nd Test Network
« on: October 03, 2015, 01:51:30 am »
mr.agsexplorer witness is updated and online, please vote it in
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
47
General Discussion / Re: October 1st Testnet for Advanced Users
« on: October 01, 2015, 04:13:57 pm »
mr.agsexplorer is up.
Code: [Select]
get_witness mr.agsexplorer
{
"id": "1.6.20",
"witness_account": "1.2.52591",
"last_aslot": 0,
"signing_key": "GPH7yYqVQZ3BB31T2P3Cot4M2Eyxo59aMLhrAvKUi54YWBJcpzAdj",
"vote_id": "1:40",
"total_votes": 0,
"url": "http://agsexplorer.com",
"total_missed": 0
}
48
General Discussion / Re: There is a witness who does not work
« on: September 27, 2015, 04:42:41 pm »
You can remove your vote for this witness on production net.
In this test run, the blockchain level test is satisfying. Dev are focusing on UI progress. Therefore this is witness's behavior is more or less 'tolerant'.
In this test run, the blockchain level test is satisfying. Dev are focusing on UI progress. Therefore this is witness's behavior is more or less 'tolerant'.
49
Technical Support / Re: Graphene API Documentation?
« on: September 26, 2015, 08:53:05 pm »
Thanks
50
Technical Support / Re: Graphene API Documentation?
« on: September 26, 2015, 06:36:30 pm »Code: [Select]
--delay-block-count --trusted-node Are they hidden options? ./witness_node --help doesn't print these options.
51
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: September 26, 2015, 12:01:54 pm »
@mf-tzo when you create account in web wallet, faucet will send you 1000 CORE on testnet, not 10000. I guess you might mistakenly thought it's 10k. This is probably where the 'missing' 9k goes. Anyway, you can check out the recent transactions to verify.
52
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: September 25, 2015, 05:01:10 am »
I borrowed some USD and the collateral position for USD is displayed correctly in my account overview page. But how do I cover it? I can only see a UPDATE button next to the position.
53
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 23, 2015, 06:34:03 pm »
All right, I stopped the double signing attack just now. First of all, I did do that. 
But it feels that didn't happen. I sent various transactions to account hoping to see some balance missing, etc, but in vain. The network seems totally immune to double signing.
Is that safe to say that 'evil' double signing in BTS1 era now goes into witness's toolbox. We can use two machines as redundancy to prevent accident server shutdown?
But it feels that didn't happen. I sent various transactions to account hoping to see some balance missing, etc, but in vain. The network seems totally immune to double signing.Is that safe to say that 'evil' double signing in BTS1 era now goes into witness's toolbox. We can use two machines as redundancy to prevent accident server shutdown?
54
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 23, 2015, 05:40:16 pm »
Double Signing attack test
Since I can't find more information about how double signing will harm the network and what defensive mechanism network will have against double signing, I am going to perform a 30 minutes double signing attack on test net. Double signing could happen due to honest witness mis-configuring node, witness server compromised by evil third party or corrupted witness.
I have 3 witness accounts voted in that I can coordinate, I am going to try double signing from 1, 2, 3 witnesses using 2 separate servers (US, Asia).
Here is the plan:
The attack will last for 30 minutes, 3 phases, each will last for 10 minutes.
phase I (0-10min): 1 double signing witness (boombastic)
phase II (10-20min): 2 double signing witness (boombastic and mr.agsexplorer)
phase III (20-30min): 3 double signing witness (boombastic and mr.agsexplorer and mrs.agsexplorer)
end (30min): stop double signing
Double signing will cause fork, I want to see after all this mess, if network can recover, and I will do some transactions during the attack and see how it's gonna affect normal user operations. If you are here, you can perform normal operation and report back after the attack is finished.
bytemaster, if you see this, please do not vote out these double signing witness just yet. In real world, if some witness starts double signing, voters might not react that quickly, network should survive on its own for at least 30 minutes.
The attack will start at today 2015-09-23 18:00 (UTC), which is 20 mintues from now
Since I can't find more information about how double signing will harm the network and what defensive mechanism network will have against double signing, I am going to perform a 30 minutes double signing attack on test net. Double signing could happen due to honest witness mis-configuring node, witness server compromised by evil third party or corrupted witness.
I have 3 witness accounts voted in that I can coordinate, I am going to try double signing from 1, 2, 3 witnesses using 2 separate servers (US, Asia).
Here is the plan:
The attack will last for 30 minutes, 3 phases, each will last for 10 minutes.
phase I (0-10min): 1 double signing witness (boombastic)
phase II (10-20min): 2 double signing witness (boombastic and mr.agsexplorer)
phase III (20-30min): 3 double signing witness (boombastic and mr.agsexplorer and mrs.agsexplorer)
end (30min): stop double signing
Double signing will cause fork, I want to see after all this mess, if network can recover, and I will do some transactions during the attack and see how it's gonna affect normal user operations. If you are here, you can perform normal operation and report back after the attack is finished.
bytemaster, if you see this, please do not vote out these double signing witness just yet. In real world, if some witness starts double signing, voters might not react that quickly, network should survive on its own for at least 30 minutes.
The attack will start at today 2015-09-23 18:00 (UTC), which is 20 mintues from now
55
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 23, 2015, 05:27:34 am »
What will happen if two witness node signing using same key due to any reason. I understand that will cause fork, but if the witness is not voted down in a timely manner and keep doing that, what will that cause? Will the network auto "kickoff" this witness?
56
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 22, 2015, 10:17:58 am »
After you update new signing key to witness account, the old witness node won't produce blocks 'cause it doesn't have correct key to sign blocks.
57
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 22, 2015, 06:19:46 am »
Therefore, in the witness server, I should only use the witness signing key to boot up the witness node, but to publish price feed, still need to import owner key/active key to cli_wallet and keep wallet unlock. Are there any suggestions to make this more secure in case server is compromised?
58
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 22, 2015, 06:04:23 am »
thanks @theoretical, it's very useful.
59
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 20, 2015, 06:14:35 pm »You may need to import the ACTIVE_KEY too!seems I don't have my owner key imported into my vps. I won't be able to vote till after work. I'm sure someone else will vote you in.Are existing 0.9.2 delegates automatically imported as a witness or is it required to upgrade and create witness object? I'm hoping to skip sorting through the hundreds of balance id's for a proper balance that also existed on the 20th.
Thank you betax, your guide was very helpful.
All existing delegates are imported as witnesses. When you get your node set up let us know and we will vote you in.
I believe I'm up now. ID: 1.6.1624Code: [Select]0 exception: unspecified
3030001 tx_missing_active_auth: missing required active authority
Missing Active Authority 1.2.63353
I think it may be a good idea to put a note in the wiki file under the paragraph saying something like "if your active key is different from your owner key, you need to import active_key as well". It will be handy for people following the wiki instruction. @xeroc
60
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 20, 2015, 05:35:02 pm »
delegates online, please help to vote in
mr.agsexplorer: 1.6.3356
mrs.agsexplorer: 1.6.3360
boombastic: 1.6.828
mr.agsexplorer: 1.6.3356
mrs.agsexplorer: 1.6.3360
boombastic: 1.6.828
