I like this very much.
My one caveat is that having: "add in employees" "show them each going poof"
"and give all the money saved to the customers?"
will open up of an attack vector by vested interests.
Political enemies of our innovations might make hay with that by spotlighting the disruptive side of this opportunity.
FOX News, CNN, et al are very adept at capitalizing on opportunities for spreading FUD.
I say be bold. Let them attack it.
But I also say we should highlight the fact that you can work for DACs or at least participate and earn shares in some of them. It's an error to make it look like a closed loop system where you just have the digital company, pure profit, and customers. That might be the ideal but it would be dishonest to present it as if that is what it is.
I think we need to be bold about the fact that it's disruptive and proud of it because younger generations want that, while at the same time understand that not everyone is a customer with money. Some people will have to find a way to earn their way into the system and we want to figure out how to show that in the video even if briefly. We have to consider that a large portion of the people viewing the video now and increasingly into the future will graduate into a recession.
So how about we add in removing the boss as the main employee that gets removed. That one addition to the video would counter every political attack. It all depends on which employees you show being removed, if it's the boss and the management, you present this as money saved being passed to the user/customer then you'll be able to market to the little guy. I put emphasis on user/customer because not everyone is immediately going to buy Bitshares and you don't want to make it seem like the only way is to spend $100 because you could end up with a situation where people start saying it's too expensive.
I think presenting it like you're removing the employees could be making it seem like somehow the upper management or boss is immune and that the little guy is thrown under the bus. Most importantly, show that in the future anyone will be able to participate, so more emphasis on the fact that DACs might still need some human operators and developers.
Imagine that a lot of the people looking at the video will be graduate or college students, or recent graduates who want a job. They might want to take part in bounties or be involved in some way other than as a customer so what about that demographic?
Sounds like a fun video.
But DACs do use employees, the video can even show more people being employed and the extra cash going to the employees and shareholders (and not to fat cat executives and big bosses, maybe they can disappear).
Lots of money going to this one guy creates the whole too good to be true look and people start shouting ponzi scheme.
DACs are companies that decentralize ownership and increase sharing of profits for everyone (employees and shareholders). A super positive thing. They are not taking away overall jobs and making this one guy rich.
This has it right.