Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wackou

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 33
151
General Discussion / Re: VOTE OUT THESE DELEGATES NOW! (Please)
« on: July 07, 2015, 06:20:40 pm »
delegate1.john-galt is still in the top 101, and keeps missing blocks!! nearly 2000 blocks missed now!

People should definitely vote him out (not least because I am now out of the top 101 again :( )

152
How do we see who updated?

You can go to bitsharesblock in the asset info page. For instance, NASDAQC is here: http://www.bitsharesblocks.com/asset/info?asset=NASDAQC

If you check the "show feeds" check box in the right part, you can see all feeds published for this asset. Here, delegates with a feed of ~5000 NASDAQC/BTS have already updated, delegates with a feed of ~800'000 BTS haven't upgraded yet.

153
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 03, 2015, 09:38:07 pm »
My first contribution was to Keyhotee and then BitShares when I submitted a couple of minor fixes that allowed to compile using clang instead of g++ on OSX.

I submit bug reports on github when I encounter bugs, and have been running a delegate in the test runs and since the launch of BitShares.

Since then, I have also been developing the bts-tools python monitoring tools, that allow to monitor a running delegate, publish feeds and send notifications in case something goes wrong. I wrote documentation for them, part of which is a tutorial on how to setup a delegate, along with monitoring tools, from scratch in a blank VM.

I also provide a seed node and chain server for both BTS and DVS.

I am not so active on the forums (I use the little time I have for coding ;) ) but I try to post when I feel I can contribute something.

BTS ID: wackou

154
Are these assets trade-able now?

Not yet, currently the distribution is the following:

Quote
old price feed (38 delegates):

calabiyau
emski
riverhead-del-server-1
angel.bitdelegate
emski.bitdelegate
delegate.xeldal
delegate2.xeldal
btsx.chinesecommunity
delegate.liondani
www.minebitshares-com
www2.minebitshares-com
google.helloworld
microsoft.helloworld
x.ebit
rose.ebit
delegate.btsnow
immortal.bitdelegate
delegate-clayop
dev.bitsharesblocks
backbone.riverhead
marketing.methodx
stan.delegate.xeldal
bm.payroll.riverhead
del0.cass
argentina-marketing.matt608
jcalfee1-developer-team.helper.liondani
delegate-dev1.btsnow
delegate-dev2.btsnow
delegate-dev4.btsnow
delegate-dev3.btsnow
market.cn.group101
delegate.rgcrypto
fuzzy.beyondbitcoin
fund.bitsharesbreakout
minebitshares-reloaded
sollywood.sollars-com
delegate.dposhub-org
chronos.payroll.lafona


new price feed (25 delegates):

testz
spartako
spartako2
spartako1
dele-puppy
delegate-alt
delegate-baozi
delegate-watchman
wackou-delegate
maqifrnswa
delegate.baozi
delegate.bitsuperlab
delegate1.maqifrnswa
delegate.ihashfury
dev-metaexchange.monsterer
btstools.digitalgaia
valzav.payroll.testz
www.bts-hk
delegate.verbaltech
minebts1.bunkermining-com
minebts3.bunkermining-com
minebts4.bunkermining-com
minebts5.bunkermining-com
minebts6.bunkermining-com
minebts2.bunkermining-com

We need at least half of the delegates to switch in order to get the new price feed, but I would actually wait that 75-80% have switched, in order to have a more stable feed.

155
Just updated my tools to 0.2.9, that should be the latest right Nick?

yup, that's the latest one.

156
Alt and Xeroc now both have updated their scripts, so I believe that all delegates can now upgrade their scripts/tools and get the new price feeds for those indices.

157
Because the price feed is derived from the MEDIAN of all feeds and we just "changed" the rules, we should first make the market stop entirely instead of having highly inconsistent prices that fuck up the MEDIAN!

Hence, I do not publish the index prices untill at least 51 delegate are willing to publish the NEW price!

I agree that it would be better to have everyone upgrade in a synchronized way, but that's probably going to be really hard to achieve. Given that the combined depth of all those markets currently is 116 BTS for bid, and 0 BTS for ask, I'd say we can start upgrading the delegate's script (let's say that the markets are unofficially closed, even though it's not technically true). Once, say, 80% of the delegates producing feeds have upgraded, then we should be able to "re-open" the markets by making a public announcement that they are working correctly and that traders can start placing their orders. What do you think?

158
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: House cleaning
« on: July 01, 2015, 01:59:05 pm »
I manage wackou-delegate (3%) which I've had since the original launch of BitShares last year, and I just recently got btstools.digitalgaia (30%) voted in, for which I propose to further develop the bts-tools monitoring tools (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,12534.30.html and http://digitalgaia.io/btstools.html), and implement the following infrastructure to help mitigate DDoS attacks on the BitShares network (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,14501.0.html and http://digitalgaia.io/backbone.html)

My short-term plan is to adapt the bts-tools now to also work with graphene witness clients and then write the software to handle the backbone nodes. I plan to (hopefully) have something running for the launch of BitShares 2.0 (which also means I'm going to run as witness for BitShares 2.0 I guess ;) )

159
What will be the fees when bitshares is at $1 each?

with this precision, still 0.01 of the asset, so:

Quote
0.01 NASDAQC = 50 BTS
0.01 HANGSENG = 266 BTS
0.01 NIKKEI = 204 BTS
0.01 SHENZHEN =  29 BTS
0.01 SHANGHAI = 45 BTS

but with 1 BTS = 1$, so you can do the math: quite expensive!  ;D

So:

I hope to be on 2.0 with a revised precision for these assets before BTS is $1  ;)

160
So has the script been updated and I can start contacting delegates?

My script has been updated, so people using the bts_tools can update, but I believe Xeroc and Alt's scripts haven't updated yet (Xeroc's still on holidays if I'm not mistaken), and we would have to wait for them to "reopen" the markets. Otherwise, some feeds are going to be in BTS and some others not, and there would be an abrupt change in the prices when more than half the delegates publishing feeds will have switched.

161
What are the transaction fees now?

If I understand correctly, once everyone switches to prices in BTS, then the fees will be what Monsterer mentioned here:

With BTS pricing:

0.01 NASDAQC = 50 BTS
0.01 HANGSENG = 266 BTS
0.01 NIKKEI = 204 BTS
0.01 SHENZHEN =  29 BTS
SHANGHAI gone from yahoo ??

So, these are perhaps a little high still :|

and 0.01 SHANGHAI would be 45 BTS

162
I released version 0.2.9 of my tools which now publish the prices for those indices in BTS instead of their native currencies. I would suggest to wait until the other scripts are updated and then tell all the delegates to upgrade. Let's get those markets open!


163
SHANGHAI gone from yahoo ??

SHANGHAI has ticker "000001.SS" on yahoo (a bit tricky to find, but it's there). It is however not available through their API (bug?), so I now scrape the yahoo page instead of querying the API directly in order to get this feed.

So if no-one is against it and speaks up in the coming days, I will implement solution 2 in my bts_tools. Then, when Xeroc and Alt have done so also, we need to get the delegates to upgrade again.

And I have one last (small) concern/question: let's suppose we get a hardfork that fixes the asset precision before BitShares 2.0 gets released. What will we do then:
 - leave it as is
 - revert to the original pricing?

Although probably we only need to start thinking about it if we get this hardfork (not sure it's a high-priority for core devs at the moment, understandably so)

164
General Discussion / Re: New bitshares.org Feedback
« on: June 17, 2015, 10:15:37 pm »
If anyone wants to collect old content I can see about creating a general Archive section or something at some point. But for the time being most legacy content is low priority for me.

Dan or Stan might have copies of some of the old documents/papers.

sure, I understand. I'll get in touch with them directly, then. Thanks!

165
General Discussion / Re: New bitshares.org Feedback
« on: June 17, 2015, 10:08:01 pm »
Any chance we could get a link somewhere to the original "BitShares - A Peer­ To­ Peer Polymorphic Digital Asset Exchange" paper? I'd like to read it again, but the only link that I could find is a dead one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=313873.0

Thanks!

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 33