Quote from: R on June 23, 2020, 07:53:56 pm

Reject. The system has been corrupted by scammers, why advertise in the current corrupted state? How will you overcome your scams when marketing?

Technically, you have no right to reject. This is donation, not worker proposal.

On the contrary, everyone has the right to reject beggars. To be fair I'll address the beggar's case:

All-round publicity and promotion to reshape the brand and let the market update the value of BitSharess has become the most important and urgent thing for BitSharess community.

Perhaps the most important and urgent thing is ceasing fraudulent price feeding of bitassets then? Since they were the most marketed feature in BTS for years? As soon as new investors become aware that the primary featured assets are blatant scams they're going to walk away.

1. The stability of the underlying code has been verified, and the system is enough to support large-scale commercial usage.

Got a source for this claim? Hackthedex has been defunded for a while now, no doubt new issues have been privately discovered.

2. The upcoming version 4.0 optimizes several business logics. Under the same system business volume, it is expected that the system revenue will increase significantly. Once the system is able to make positive profits, the value-added of BTS token can also be achieved through self-development, rather than the injection of external speculation funds.

How will system revenue increase significantly under the current low business volume? Unless you propose to increase fees this doesn't make sense.

How will BTS value increase through 'self-development' if no external funds buy BTS to increase its' value? This makes no sense.

3. The reserve pool is about to burn 250 million BTS, which means, the number of BTS that may flow to the market in the future has decreased by 250 million, meeting the expectation of halving countdown that is popular in the market.

This will have zero beneficial impact on the market value of BTS, they are already non-liquid funds; destroying these funds only serves as a temporary irreversible PR stunt as well as dooming future worker proposals to a lack of funds (do you expect everyone to beg for donations like yourself?)

4. BTS + + mobile wallet, as an officially funded wallet, is becoming more and more perfect in function and experience, which can fully support large-scale users.

It was funded by a worker proposal, but it's a third party app not 'official' by any means at all.

Can you provide a source on it's ability to support 'large-scale' users? On the google play store it has only 1000 installs after years of being available, wow.

Further the app continues to lie about the state of bitassets to investors, scam collusion much?

However, the previous marketing worker proposal was not approved by enough shareholders, mainly due to the lack of support from outside of Chinese community. BTS 4.0 is coming soon, but there is rarely reports about BitShares on mainstream media, this is unbearable!

Support from outwith the CN community has been significantly degraded due to your (and your associates) actions damaging international relations for years now.

Wirex integration denied, development funding denied, HTD denied, bitassets repeatedly defrauded, WP refund/thresholds blocking productivity, countless beneficial BSIPs rejected.

Now you're losing support from within the CN community & have had to resort to e-begging, sad.

To note that the use of fund will not be reported to non-donors, nor promise any effect, nor accept any criticism from non-donors.

You're up front making no promise to provide any beneficial effect from received donations? Admitting defeat up front, sad.

We call on everyone to consider for their own investment and work together to promote the BTS.
Let’s go back to 2013, when decentralization sprit was shining the BitShares community!

Back to 2013? Before CN drove dan out, before CN repeatedly defrauded tens of thousands of bitasset holders, before cn-vote, before countless CEX outpaced BTS DEX developments, sounds good but also completely delusional.

the same as you are.... but you are dump without money ... LOL

Quote from: R on June 22, 2020, 09:57:16 am

Obviously. They're dumb scammers, breaking the network comes naturally to them.

On the contrary, I unlike cn-vote (and their entire follower base) am not a scammer. Everyone will remember the year lost to cn-vote's scams, sad.

Obviously. They're dumb scammers, breaking the network comes naturally to them.

bitCNY is a scamcoin now, be aware that you're participating in a fractional reserve asset based market

Sounds about right, I don't see a reversal of the downtrend in sight as long as the platform is corrupted by cn-vote (and their cabal). I like many are jumping ship.

Bitshares telegram channel is dead imo, corrupt cn-vote associates implemented severe censorship which destroyed the integrity of the chat. Sad to see China export its pathetic censorship overseas.

Status: Accepted

BS. Zero effort to involve community, fake rubber stamp much?

Smart coins are the original assets of the system, and the corresponding holders should enjoy the dividend of system growth.

They were, now they're confirmed SCAM coins. There's also no such system growth to justify such a dividend, rather there has been a severe economic contraction due to recent failures by cn-vote and friends.

The purpose of this proposal is to establish a scientific financial model of BTS, make reasonable use of the commission income of the committee, open up resources and reduce expenditure, and promote the stable growth of BTS system value.

This is not a "scientific financial model" but rather simply bribery of scam token holders.

This further does nothing to 'reduce expenditure' nor 'promote stable growth', if anything this BTS will be dumped further degrading the value of BTS. Major fail.

Participating assets: bitCNY, bitUSD, bitEUR, bitRUBLE

Why include USD & CNY? They're confirmed scam coins.

1)Participating accounts should register at the beginning of each cycle.Account does not participate in reward if not registered. The registration method can be to transfer any small number of bitassets to the specified account.

Why not just include all asset holders over the minimum value rather than require bribing a centralized account for payout? Sounds like targeting a subset of asset holders to corrupt distribution.

2)The reward needs to be collected actively. If the reward is not collected within the time limit, this part of the reward will not be accumulated.The collection method can be to transfer any small number of bitasset to the specified account.

This is not functionality that exists in BTS, just send the assets to the asset holder rather than invent absurd rules like this. You do know it's possible to programmatically send funds without degrading the platform as you propose?

3)Set the upper limit of daily reward yield, such as 5 ‰. The purpose is to prevent the situation that the total amount of bitasset participating in the lock up award is too small and the yield is too high. Prevent waste of money.

Users will split their assets over multiple accounts to evade this, this rule is dead on arrival.

5)There is a reward for recommending new registered account to participate in lock in the reward plan. If the number of locked in bitassets in the account reaches a certain amount (e.g. 100000 bitcny, other bitassets are calculated based on the exchange rate year-on-year), it can be applied as a promotion account. If the new account recommended for registration by the account participates in the locked in of smart assets, the account can obtain corresponding rewards.

What is the reward per account? Who do users register with? A centralized entity or the network? This just seems like an open door to further cheat the system, real amateur stuff.

The dividend shall be destroyed at the same time as it is distributed in each reward cycle.

Why? Is this returning the tokens to the reserves from the committee account or sending the tokens to the null-account? These assets are already doing nothing in the committee account, so their destruction will yield zero benefit to the value of BTS, serious failure in understanding crypto economics here guys.

      If baip6 passes, it will be carried out at the same time. After the consumption of the Council's stock funds, 30% of the Council's monthly income is used for destruction, 30% is used for warehouse locking and reward distribution, 30% is used for mining with hanging orders, and 10% is used for Council reservation. The parameters are adjusted in the same proportion.
     If baip6 fails, the proposal will be implemented separately. After the consumption of the Council's stock funds, 30% of the Council's monthly income is used for destruction, 60% is used for lock in rewards, and 10% is used for the Council's reservation. The parameters are adjusted in the same proportion.

Who is the council? The committee? Use the correct terminology.

What is warehouse locking? Do you mean destroying BTS? Make up your mind with regards to what terminology you're using.

What on earth are 'hanging orders' and at whose discretion will this fund be used to manipulate the market?

You mention mining, but THERE'S NO MINING IN BITSHARES, what is this for? I can't believe how out of touch cn-vote is with regards to this platform, it's unreal.

Why does this council require 10% reserve funds? Personal corrupt funds?

much less risky than bitusd & bitcny, which are irrefutably proven scams due to almost a year of faking price feeds to bail out bad gamblers in china, pathetic.