661
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares slogans
« on: May 19, 2014, 10:16:59 am »
Bitshares Everything
Bitshares Anything
Bitshares Anything
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
这翻译是不是用google翻的,读起来怎么怪怪的。我敢肯定这不是谷歌翻译,因为我用了一遍。读起来怪怪的大概是应该是因为我们与猫兄相隔两岸,语言习惯略有区别。
或许你需要我修改后的版本http://www.mybitshares.com/bitshares-x-status-update.html
Keyhotee的重要性是不言而喻的
关键是之前在技术上是否定义过高?
能不能降低要求重新定义一下技术方向,降低难度之后再开发?
若是非要去完成一个现阶段不可能完成的任务就会浪费资源了
还不如以现实可行的技术能力为依托开发一个自己能胜任并且可以达到最低使用要求的新Keyhotee
BTS X是模拟现实里的银行
DACs们是模拟现实里的各行各业的盈利性公司
Keyhotee是模拟现实里的通信
整个生态圈应该是由很多DAC来组成的一个完整模拟社会
若是缺少了Keyhotee,就好比我们现实里缺少了电话 手机 电脑等,到时候我们的活动仍然会有一部分暴露在政府部门的监视之下,而Keyhotee可以很大程度上弥补这个裂缝,可以整合整个生态系统的人脉和通信
抛开技术因素,价值需求因素不谈,我一直不明白为什么用BTA直接参与玩法就便利了,利于推广了,从Lotto的角度看,用BTA还不如直接用BTC。由于BTC的波动性和小众化特点,用BTC的话,没有几个玩家。
in which way the blockchain locks down time?
Try looking at it this way:
The price of PTS at any point in time represents the market's assessment of the potential of the entire BitShares industry.
When a DAC spins off, some of that potential spins off with it and the price of PTS drops by the amount of future potential that is no longer predicted by PTS. Nobody minds though, because they now own shares in both and the sum of the two is greater because the value that moved has gone from potential to actual.
So when donated PTS shares "split" the donated value just moves into different buckets. It is still there to help fund the growth of the industry as the donors intended. To the extent that these spin-offs are successful, the seed money available to maintain and promote them grows too.
And thus each successful spinoff replenishes the supply of funds expended to create it, making those funds available again for the next DAC in the development queue. With luck, the funds will grow exponentially, making the number of DACs we can fund in parallel grow exponentially.
This is what we have promised to do with spinoffs from donated funds. We did not promise to leave them idle or to burn them. That would be poor stewardship indeed!
新想法跟去中心化完全是悖论啊,只不过从算力中心化变成财力中心化。不知我理解的对不对
如果用BIP作为单位的话有个问题就是,如果你比较长时间没打开客户端同步块链的话,要想转账的话得等待块链同步到最新,不然不知道自己到底有多少BIP。在没同步前转账也会出问题,发送的BIP会比实际该转账的多。