Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - giant middle finger

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7
31
General Discussion / Re: Things I don't like about the committee
« on: February 07, 2016, 11:25:19 am »
Quote from: kenCode on February 07, 2016, 10:35:23 am
@jakub +5% +5% +5%
ALL discussions by voted-in members should be done right here on the fourm. Don't ask shareholders to install telegram, learn slack or whatever new trendy tool comes out.
 
Customer service and transparency are imperative, especially in this crypto-space, it's a major learning curve for people. Make it easy for the newcomers!
 

transparent debate among our elected reps is what the masses demand

conducting secret closed door discussions is the fastest way to get voted out

32
General Discussion / Re: Should we Abandon Proof of Stake Marketing?
« on: February 06, 2016, 02:06:21 pm »
Quote from: Stan on February 05, 2016, 05:45:17 pm
Quote from: -banano- on February 05, 2016, 07:26:51 am
what's wrong with calling us "proof of work"?

what do you call your miners?

"workers"

ok then

Bitcoin calls their workers: "miners" so they should change their name to Proof of Mine

What are our workers doing that bitcoin's "miners"(workers) aren't?

Bitshares is more POW than bitcoin if anybody asks me, but since we are on the coinmarketcap 100, nobody asks or cares what consensus model you use anymore because none have been hacked and none are 100% decentralized.

+1

No, shet, who cares about about proof of work/burn/stake/importance/activity, none are perfect, and all are secure.

All money cares about now is features.  Ever hear of Ethereum, Factom, Emercoin, Alexandria, Zcash, Synereo, Maidsafe, etc.

It's 2016 already, the proof of "who cares what" is irrelevant to the "what can I use it for?" question.

Proof of consensus was Bitcoin1.0

Proof that your application works is what everyone wants to know about since "proof of anything" has been proven secure from hack/theft.

Tell me this :

When was the last time you had a discussion about "doublespending?"

See, that conversation was abandoned back when we abandoned the POW vs POS arguments ultimately realizing that it is an argument of opinion like what would you do if I started a "what's your favorite flavor of ice cream or nationality of woman?" thread etc...

what we are really just doing here is proof of masturbation... When is the DARK DEX going to be ready?   

33
General Discussion / Re: trading decred on the DEX
« on: February 06, 2016, 01:54:14 pm »
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290358.msg13786819#msg13786819

fav is a decred member, he can help us!

34
General Discussion / Re: OBITS HODLERs, your money is in danger.
« on: January 28, 2016, 01:22:42 pm »
Quote from: giant middle finger on January 28, 2016, 01:20:09 pm
do do

lol, note to self, no proofreading while stoned


















oh, sorry, left the mic on

35
General Discussion / Re: OBITS HODLERs, your money is in danger.
« on: January 28, 2016, 01:20:09 pm »
SWEET!

Our first big Ripple/Stellar breakup fork!

Will BitSharesX2 be sharedropping on BTS???

Or maybe we are making too big a deal about this temporary BitShares 2.0 blinded transactions special introductory offer to try before you buy (a lifetime membership)

Then 3 months later, the fees go back to normal, and we have 100x the number of users, and Ronny makes his killing.

What am I missing?

I thought that this was just a special promotional launch marketing initiative.

We do do "marketing" right?


36
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 27, 2016, 04:26:55 pm »
BTS is rising because some snot nosed kid cashed some Ether gains for a BTS stake that will forever be BIGGER than yours!!!

Peace brother...

37
Openledger / Re: OpenLedger Suggestions
« on: January 26, 2016, 06:59:37 pm »
oh oh oh oh !

I got one:




sue IBM.Microsoft/Wells Fargo, and the rest for slander!

http://www.coindesk.com/ibm-launches-open-source-blockchain-project-backed-by-linux-and-big-banks/

38
Follow My Vote / Re: Source Code Release for Stake Weighted Voting App
« on: January 26, 2016, 06:56:53 pm »
So, is the consensus "yes" on anonymous voting or "no" it won't work?

I'm too stoned to know who won the BM vs. monsterer battle...

39
Follow My Vote / Re: Follow My Vote Press Release!
« on: January 26, 2016, 06:53:07 pm »
Presentation looks sweet.

Could this be the front end for prediction market too???

If so, then Dark Auger is born!

40
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: January 26, 2016, 04:14:26 am »
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ttN0flPsnBc


https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=h44H_Sy7Pf4

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FQA9Ccg1KWI


41
General Discussion / Re: Cryptsy's woes are a good excuse to tout OpenLedger
« on: January 24, 2016, 08:10:15 am »
That's why the REAL launch won't happen until the release of blinded transactions!

They are going to get the website working too when we launch for REAL

42
General Discussion / Re: poll for the percent based transfer fee
« on: January 23, 2016, 09:19:32 pm »
how else are we supposed to show off our superior TPS if we don't incentivize people to make lots of T's?

43
General Discussion / Re: [FYI] Bitgo Instant Provides Lightning Fast Exchanges on ShapeShift.io
« on: January 22, 2016, 05:52:38 pm »
Quote from: Erlich Bachman on January 20, 2016, 07:29:37 am
lol, "not to mention a complete lack of customizability"

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fVrQdz_x9hs

lol, funny, but we are the Mac in this movie

Ethereum, NXT, and the bitcoin patchwork are the "customizable (programmable)" Android OS parallel here.

BitShares is the sleek, bug free   ;D and faster "bad" apple.  I say "bad" because it looks like once we launch Stealth Transactions, we will be viewed as the "Dark" Ethereum


44
General Discussion / Re: IMF just published on digital currencies
« on: January 21, 2016, 01:32:48 pm »
oh shit!

I did not realize that there was, in fact, a "legal definition of MY money"

From the doc:



ARE VIRTUAL CURRENCIES MONEY?
16. Several questions arise when considering the role of VCs as money

Do they satisfy the legal definition of money?




good thing that there is no BitShares "Foundation,"  otherwise, they might be asked to talk to other humans:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/11/21/heres-how-bitcoin-charmed-washington/

Good thing that an "indestructible profitable robot" could never be mistaken as a "money" whatever the legal definition for that is...

45
General Discussion / Re: Who would support a limited offer of drastically reduced fees?
« on: January 18, 2016, 01:17:36 pm »
Quote from: bitcrab on January 11, 2016, 03:52:09 pm
I prefer to lower fees step by step.

I think that the opposite would attract more buzz.

The sudden shock to the heart to wake the corpse:



We should have launched with low fees (limited time offer to induce panic buying)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 22 queries.