很详细

现在还只是一个提议

得益于开发者和志愿者的不断努力，bts系统到今天为止已经初具雏形，并开始蒸蒸日上了,社区也成长为一支重要的力量。但随着时间的发展和一些事件的推动，社区的一些不足也渐渐浮出水面:

1.社区的发展几乎全靠志愿者，但却没有一个长期的志愿者激励计划。虽然我们依然能够看到，一些志愿者还是在不断的发一些科普、提议或者推广的文章，但也有志愿者表露出了心灰意冷的情绪，这种状态不利于志愿者积极性的维持和志愿者队伍的扩充，长此以往必然导致志愿者队伍规模的缩减，出现后继乏人的情况。因此，我们应该提倡任正非“不让雷锋吃亏”的做法，给与一些精神和物质上的奖励。

2.社区的帖子鱼龙混杂，有正经的科普、翻译、讨论文章，也有无聊的抱怨吐槽甚至纯粹发泄贴，如果没有一个专门组织来收集整理，那么这些优秀文章很快就石沉大海，而无脑的抱怨贴、泄愤帖因其不需要思考，反而吸引了大量的关注和回复，噪声淹没了社区真正的基石，这显然是我们不想看到的。

3.在QQ群，经常有些闪光的观点被提出并讨论，但是由于激励作用有限，讨论之后便无后文，而不是被记录下来以便后人能够吸收这些优秀的思想。

4.社区还应该发挥更大的作用，在经济模型探讨、发展路线制定以及受托人选举等场合发挥更大的影响力，现在社区各自为战、一盘散沙的局面显然无法做到这一点。

因此我决定推行一个bts发展激励计划,这个计划逐步实施，要做的工作有：

1.收集发表在本论坛、其他论坛、微博的有价值的的科普，提议，讨论，反馈，推广，翻译甚至吐槽帖子，按周或者按月整理在一起，并作奖励。

2.对在微博，其他论坛等场合作出的其他贡献做一些临时性的奖励。

3.对有贡献的人或团队点名表扬。

4.对有价值的讨论提议和推广帖子，交给中文社区发言人和官方做沟通。

5.表达一些中文社区普遍赞同的观点，或者做一些类似时评的点评。


细则：



1.发布在论坛的帖子并不要求是首发，比如发到比特股之家或者微博的帖子照样可以领取奖励，但最好将该帖子重发到论坛以便留存和评测。

2.每批次选出的文章篇数视该期文章质量而定，不做限制。

1.为了减少工作量，所有参与该计划的帖子最好遵循一个标准的表述，分为：科普、翻译、提议、反馈、吐槽、推广、观点等几类。比如：[提议：bts志愿者长期激励计划]

3.每篇帖子最好都要有投票功能，设置支持、反对、中立等基本选项，这样做是为了增强公信力。

4.视情况每篇帖子100-500bts的奖励，并会每期公布，奖励额度总额度视收到的支持制定



说明：

1.对帖子价值的判断有很大的主观性，这点不可避免，因此要引入投票制度来平衡一下，但还是不能完全避免。如果有不合理的地方，欢迎其他的评测人跟我竞争。

2.这个事情第一次做，细则会慢慢完善，当然也保留更改的权利。


最新进展：该计划已交由由helloworld团队主办（我本人也是helloworld一员），btsfund中国基金提供资金支持。

bitusd生来就是自由流动、没有时间限制的。

short出来的bitusd 30天内要购回强制平仓，没人short的话，就没有bitusd用了。

非常骚气的log，我喜欢···

Cause my english is poor,and i dont have enough time to modify,let me be bluntly.

I am a frequent trader, often "cut chives," I know very well the reasons behind the falling prices. If you need evidence, I can put some transaction records to prove my specialty - the evidence will show that I was a good trader, in most cases are cut chives, only in the bts, I was cut chives up-what a sad story! i call it"Faith pains" or "Cost of true love".

Price decline was due to investors departure,yes,they gone.

Market is a rather special place, filled with rational and irrational. When talking about the market, we should throw away the calculator, not 1 + 1 = 2 so simple. When it comes to the "dilution" will or not affect the price, we should not be holding a calculator, but to fully consider the impact of this matter on investor confidence. Investors leave because 1.btsx become more complex,so complex that is difficult to explain to most people - I mean changes in equity 2.3i dazzling showcase his capability to tamper with the bts -  emphasized the "capability",dont tell me there is no damage，please once again throw away your calculator.3i has given many people many reasons to attack bts,no "zuo"(equal to play fire) no die.

Emphasize that: 1.only a simple model can attract investors -  investors can easily understand, just like pts and ags.2.Profit model should be simple - invest one time, no need to be concerned about any more.OK,frankly, that means do not arbitrarily change the rules.Remember:trust is hard to built and easy to destroy .

I am very angry,  not angry with what 3i had done, but 3i has not yet aware of the problem, still no respect for market rules.

Am i agree with 3i now rules? Yes, if the beginning is so--at least not very bad.

But if PTS was not "POW",part of the BTSX was reserved for the developer and DNS was not born,that will be more porfect.
 
We must do something to make the situation better, from now on.a test chain? a good product manager? a good economic model for the division?

We need ALL!

1.Take the new asset-publishing rule as a example(on the line suddenly,damn!): auction or pay,which is better? floating charge or a fixed fee,which is better? 12345 letters asset charging rules can be refined? Why not protect these assets previously like BITUSD?

People can low-cost registered a number of BTS account, this is the first mistake; System critical account name was not protected previously, which is the second; after the market is on line, a lot of people lost money, unable to open positions result in burst positions, this is the third.If the farther back then, we can also found that many did not do things, and these things could have been avoided.

A test chain can largely solve this problem.

2.An easy to use wallet is the best publicity, can refer to Apple.

3.Economic model is the most important thing, do not arbitrary change, any change would have damage investor - even if it seems the system is not damaged. You can try several times on the test chain, or take to do mathematical modeling. In short, do not hurry to finish the work, to be stable.

，+5%，+5%，+5%

票不多，还是要支持一下···

alt大神，资产名字是不是不能用数字？