I hate inflation more than you, that's why I prefer a pre-determined equity/inflation model.
Possible off topic, but how you hate inflation more than me if:
I can not find anything useful in it, and you are OK with pre-determined inflation model?
Not to go into 'how pre-determined it is' if one can voted in and out of it.
You found something useful in shareholders voting to create new shares for an opportunity.
How DAC B resolves the issue:- by Voting, increases the share supply with exactly what is needed, effectively taking as much as needed inflation, (possible all at once and not by a long slow process, in the case of needing the whole amount at once).
I hate that, I don't want to worry about shareholders diluting me by some amount in future I can't control.
If they have some small inflation I can already see it will be treated like the revenue in BTSX where they vote to burn it most of the time, unless there is a good opportunity that is worthy of dilution that revenue doesn't cover. As it is pre-determined you can make some calculations about the future.
Like we know Bitcoin should have max 21 million units and a set rate of inflation. If I had to worry about people changing the model or it issuing new coins above the model they started with, I wouldn't want to own it.
Of course the other model is no inflation, give the developers the funds for 18 months development and hope the revenue is enough after that to meet the needs of the DAC and that the developers won't be targeted in those 18 months. It's not terrible but there are risks. Is that your preferred kind of model?