0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This is a first. Finally some user friendly improvements to the pool. I would still like to use worker names with characters instead of numbers.YAM won't accept my email address as the password.
Some improvements on DwarfPool 1. It's possible to separate your workers without changing the wallet-id now. This allows to get personal vardiff, if you have many rigs located behind stratum-proxy.To specify the workers just enough to add in username (which is as wallet-id now), a number after point: YOUR_WALLET . NUMBERExample:Code: [Select] HA5FPuWibнvoqiMPeUVptyGAwqg7y7uV5C.1 HA5FPuWibнvoqiMPeUVptyGAwqg7y7uV5C.2 HA5FPuWibнvoqiMPeUVptyGAwqg7y7uV5C.3The main way without number works as before. 2. Implemented a monitoring of your workers. In case of disconnection from all servers you get an email within 5 minutes.To enable monitoring just run miner with an email instead of your password. To disable it enough to restart the miner without email as password.Monitoring works for each worker and IP separately. With WORKER_ID you can separately monitor your rigs.DwarfPool German quality you can trust!
HA5FPuWibнvoqiMPeUVptyGAwqg7y7uV5C.1 HA5FPuWibнvoqiMPeUVptyGAwqg7y7uV5C.2 HA5FPuWibнvoqiMPeUVptyGAwqg7y7uV5C.3
Hey guys!So I currently have 33605 shares but havnt passed the 2.2 coin mark I found while testing the pool last week.I have read the previous comments in this thread but just wanted to confirm, I wont receive any coins until the block has been found? I was pushing about 70 HPM the entire weekend.Any thoughts are welcome,Thanks
Is there an issue with the mmc pool ?I got this error:Code: [Select][2014-03-01 14:05:42.301344] MMC Agg. SPM: 20.707, HPM: 22.377; Rnds C/I: 63/0, Don. C/I: 79/32; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 20.707/1.5215, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 22.159/1.3850 142 rnds AV=2, ART=43322[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301370] moria.dwarfpool.com: Failure, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301375] erebor.dwarfpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 17, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301379] work.mmcpool.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301382] mmcpool.1gh.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.776368] Found solution - 1610 / 1968 / 3093848796[2014-03-01 14:05:42.776415] Share found![2014-03-01 14:05:43.171174] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false[2014-03-01 14:05:44.919707] Found solution - 797 / 1968 / 2283288260[2014-03-01 14:05:44.950842] Found solution - 2836 / 1968 / 2330885166[2014-03-01 14:05:44.950891] Share found![2014-03-01 14:05:45.350686] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false[2014-03-01 14:05:45.847514] Found solution - 3795 / 1968 / 1367379459[2014-03-01 14:05:45.847563] Share found![2014-03-01 14:05:46.269629] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301344] MMC Agg. SPM: 20.707, HPM: 22.377; Rnds C/I: 63/0, Don. C/I: 79/32; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 20.707/1.5215, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 22.159/1.3850 142 rnds AV=2, ART=43322[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301370] moria.dwarfpool.com: Failure, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301375] erebor.dwarfpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 17, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301379] work.mmcpool.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301382] mmcpool.1gh.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0[2014-03-01 14:05:42.776368] Found solution - 1610 / 1968 / 3093848796[2014-03-01 14:05:42.776415] Share found![2014-03-01 14:05:43.171174] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false[2014-03-01 14:05:44.919707] Found solution - 797 / 1968 / 2283288260[2014-03-01 14:05:44.950842] Found solution - 2836 / 1968 / 2330885166[2014-03-01 14:05:44.950891] Share found![2014-03-01 14:05:45.350686] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false[2014-03-01 14:05:45.847514] Found solution - 3795 / 1968 / 1367379459[2014-03-01 14:05:45.847563] Share found![2014-03-01 14:05:46.269629] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false
Quote from: Delinquency on March 01, 2014, 03:27:33 pmMy CFG:Code: [Select]mine = getwork://address@moria.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmine = getwork://address@erebor.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmy CFG:Code: [Select]mine = getwork://address@moria.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmine = getwork://address@erebor.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmine = getwork://address@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmcmine = getwork://address@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcso similar with yours.Quote from: ManeBjorn on March 01, 2014, 03:29:38 pmI have not gotten that at all. In fact I just found two shares in a row with no problems while checking.Maybe because I tried to swing too many server (only 18) at the same time and the ddos protection kick in.
My CFG:Code: [Select]mine = getwork://address@moria.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmine = getwork://address@erebor.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
mine = getwork://address@moria.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmine = getwork://address@erebor.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
mine = getwork://address@moria.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmine = getwork://address@erebor.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmcmine = getwork://address@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmcmine = getwork://address@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
I have not gotten that at all. In fact I just found two shares in a row with no problems while checking.
Quote from: Atrides on February 03, 2014, 10:00:14 pmin the interview with ghashio you can read, that they reduced their market share by themselves how I mentioned, because they didn't just want to make a profit out of the coin but to expand bitcoin community and develop the large bitcoin economic structure.Well, of course it made sense for ghashio back then: PR attacks on them were undermining the bitcoin credibility and value itself, and they were heavily vested in bitcoin. Please note it was not them doing bad, but rather those attacking them. However, the MMC has something like a central authority by design: it is, naturally, the largest wallet in the system (save for bter perhaps who cannot bother playing voting ). This authority has already been executed on Newmine, and essentially nothing happened.
in the interview with ghashio you can read, that they reduced their market share by themselves how I mentioned, because they didn't just want to make a profit out of the coin but to expand bitcoin community and develop the large bitcoin economic structure.
Quote from: Delinquency on February 03, 2014, 09:46:23 pmI have tested the stratum server: not quite working yet, however I could give you some sympathy for how many getwork requests that pool owners are receiving.My stratum server crashes after a minute or two of running, and none of the shares get submitted from stratum+tcp://moria.dwarfpool.com:3334I'm sorry, how can you test stratum?Stratum works on pool because the stratum is the core of pool, and getwork is just proxy for stratum. We don't have stratum-clients currently.. it is just in development
I have tested the stratum server: not quite working yet, however I could give you some sympathy for how many getwork requests that pool owners are receiving.My stratum server crashes after a minute or two of running, and none of the shares get submitted from stratum+tcp://moria.dwarfpool.com:3334
I'd suggest that you educate yourself about 51% attack actually: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/658/what-can-an-attacker-with-51-of-hash-power-doOr are you well aware and just spreading FUD?
I started the pool because of my sympathy to algorithm of memorycoin.but the danger of extinction of coin is big because of too high concentration of the network hashrate on the one pool. if the system is compromised, there is not much faith in a coin and no big interest on buying it. This also can be one of the reasons why memorycoin is not accepted on the stock exchanges. At the moment the price falls, as well as difficulty of mining, minus 30% for 2 weeks means leakage on miners..The same happened to bitcoin when ghashio almost closed to 51%, the pool cut down its power for itself.
s, how does adding other alt-coins to the pool server affect server load?
The pool is occasionally reports slower HPM speeds for me.I am losing 20-40% of my hashing power to this inefficiency.My payouts are not affected but it is unlikely that I will continue to stay at this pool if the pool cannot process my shares while other powerful miners transfer over to this pool.
Pool owner, Please,read this.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002I am very tempted to just hop to the luckiest pools to grab the most amount of MMC.We got two blocks with ~5k shares and now we're up to 27k shares.
90-100HPM has joined the pool!
I have stopped mining in your pool until i get all the HPMs generated for last 12 hrs
why is the HPM displayed on the pool is different than HPM displayed by the miner?
what is the server config the worker MLkkYvuqdTGfcBuyCc2UVhNuK585X4GLMS is using to get 98 HPM?
So it seems dwarfpool drops all submitted shares between network blocks, wtf ?This is a seriously messed up way to set things up. Shares should be counted based on blocks found on the pool and not based on network blocks found.Right now you are wasting alot of work of users who submitted alot of shares and in effect can end up getting penalised against new users who just joined inside a block that does get found by dwarfpool which is a huge no-no.I will move remaining portion of my farm over here but not in the state you have it setup.Basicly I could be throwing 10000 hpm at the pool right now submitting work and the network find 2 or 3 new blocks for other pools. If I drop for just one second due to various reasons(network issues etc.) and dont submit 1 share when the pool hits its own block, all my previous work means nothing and I get rewarded nothing for the newly found block by dwarfpool.
Quote from: soulistyce on January 19, 2014, 01:45:07 pmim new to mmc started using your pool today, is there anyway to view our coin stats, how mutch we've earn??seen the new worker stats search and thanksbut may not be working fine, my stats still says zero with a lot of sharesMK2RGagiMEz4J1fqQuTaZXZaPFbb6nedda
im new to mmc started using your pool today, is there anyway to view our coin stats, how mutch we've earn??
Why does yvg1900 not open source CPU miner?! Is it greed? OH YES. ABSOLUTELY YES.
Thanks for the clarification. But the real question is - why not open source the CPU/GPU miners? Is it pride? Is it greed? Is it fear? Afraid code can be adapted to other coins and you won't get rewarded?
I will move a portion onto dwarfpool as soon as you offer actual worker stats, only seeing hashrate isn't enough.
Quote from: reorder on January 18, 2014, 05:48:24 pmIt is very simple really - we opensource it today, tomorrow ypool has 95% network. They have done it to XPM and PTS, if it is of any indication..Oh, so it will switch from 90% at 1gh to 95% at ypool (which I doubt). What is ypool's fee? Do you have interest in the 1gh pool?
It is very simple really - we opensource it today, tomorrow ypool has 95% network. They have done it to XPM and PTS, if it is of any indication..
Thanks for the clarification. But the real question is - why not open source the CPU/GPU miners? Is it pride? Is it greed? Is it fear? Afraid code can be adapted to other coins and you won't get rewarded?I'm just curious is there a way to motivate you guys to open source it? I also think actions like that would help increase the value of MMC, which as you can see is still hurting.I'm looking at MemoryCoin as a hobby at the moment (although I am generating about 3000MMC/day) and am learning a great deal of useful information. I would love to look at how an optimized CPU/GPU miner works and see if I can provide a different optimization. My time is very limited since I do have a solid full time job, I'm sure if I had the time off I could reinvent one in about two weeks from scratch. I've done a fair share of video game programming and writing shaders. But even in my limited time I'm sure I could help with optimizations.Cheers!
Why not just provide a link to the original download location if one does not plan something nasty?
Quote from: reorder on January 18, 2014, 04:21:47 pmBeware, the binary this guy has stolen from mmc.1gh.com is modified and may contain malware (and most certainly it does).While I commend you for doing the detective work and making sure binaries are not altered, I have an issue with you using the work "stolen" everytime someone uses your binary and modifies it.How do I know your original binary doesn't have malware to begin with? I have to take your word for it, which doesn't inspire much confidence. You could have malware on the machine that you used to build the binary, even if you didn't intend to include one. The lack of open sourced projects here is not helping the confidence in this coin. There are plenty of people out there who will ONLY build from source.We could set a bounty for open sourcing both yam and reorder's binaries and then all that "stealing" argument would go away. I'm sure everything and everyone has a price.Furthermore - is it really stealing if it's already stolen? I could be wrong, but isn't your so called binary built on top of open source that has GNU license, hence the law says you should open source your binaries anyways? It's just hypocritical. I understand that you want to get rewarded for you efforts, and I think we can all benefit a lot more if these projects get open sourced. Then more people can look at optimizations, etc.
Beware, the binary this guy has stolen from mmc.1gh.com is modified and may contain malware (and most certainly it does).
Quote from: Atrides on January 18, 2014, 04:34:51 pm$ md5sum mc2-1gh-lin-x64.tgz 02a3c6231b934e77a2c2fdeda906a23d mc2-1gh-lin-x64.tgz[/code]The same md5 are on your filesORLY?Code: [Select]MD5 (mmc-miner.exe) = 9efeb412c23f33ec9e40b9a934b8f65a
$ md5sum mc2-1gh-lin-x64.tgz 02a3c6231b934e77a2c2fdeda906a23d mc2-1gh-lin-x64.tgz[/code]The same md5 are on your files
MD5 (mmc-miner.exe) = 9efeb412c23f33ec9e40b9a934b8f65a
$ md5sum mmc-miner.exeacd3d9897b338a27f4aff1970221e7df mmc-miner.exe$ md5sum mc2-1gh-lin-x64.tgz 02a3c6231b934e77a2c2fdeda906a23d mc2-1gh-lin-x64.tgz
Hi, nice theme. is there any reward for the first miners?
Getwork-only?
X-Roll-nTime support?
Plans to support long polls?
You can put in hosts-file nearest to you one of DwarfPool's IP address.For moria (US):198.251.81.40 mmcpool.1gh.com