Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
How can one unfairly give something away? We aren't entitled to anything.Regardless of whether its 'fair' I hope there is no change now. For once I would like to see something NOT change. We seem to have taken the 'reimagine everything' motto a bit too literally.
That's an interesting argument. Let's not concern ourselves with what is fair. I for one will not be participating in another round of "Angel" investing coming from PLAY, if it ever needs one.
If this sort of angry haggling is what any dev that wants to share drop to the community faces they likely won't. If I had a good idea for a DAC I'd do the 10% pts, maybe 10% AGS and spend the rest on dev and marketing talent.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Angelshares were used as a grant for funding the PLAY dac. There are millions of dollars that were donated at a very real risk to fund development. That kind of support should be valued just as highly as the network effect of BTS holders. BTS holders should not be getting 3 times the allocation in my opinion. The Pre Feb28 windfall was a huge gift. Why are the same people getting a larger share this time? It makes no sense! Not because of a contracted obligation but because this community should recognize those that gifted thousands of BTC to make PLAY possible. What part of that is so difficult to understand? If fairness doesn't interest you how about the basic principle of reciprocity?
The only argument I hear in opposition is once again to stop nagging and just be quiet. Which is an interesting argument. One that I will weigh when considering future support of this community.
No date was announced yet .. blockchain is not ready yet .. client is in the development ..
We can only guesstimate the release date
When snapshotting Play you should allocate collateral between shorts and longs based upon the price feed.
I also feel that AGS/PTS deserve more than BTS simply because AGS was used to fund your grant Hack Fisher. So I would reverse the allocation if it were up to me. 10% BTS and 40% AGS/PTS.
I would also not do a pre-sale of any form. Launch and fund with dilution.
That said I am just one opinion of many so do what you think is best.
I also support not to do crowdsale to avoid any legal issues.
I think godzirra has a valid point I also made before here!I find this allocation to be ridiculous. Post Feb 28 holders are supposed to be rewarded for making much of this possible. Instead Btsx gets another huge allocation. Of course Hack fisher can do whatever he wants. But it is absurd in my opinion.
Here godzirra goes again..! From the ocean you can see his monstrous frame rise steadily, pools of water rushing down his scales like whitewater down a mountain pass...as he treads into the shores of bitshares playland. He is looking for a million points...a record even his mother never achieved. Men=10, women=15, children and elderly=20. Buildings=400, Key infrastructure=1500. Go our little angry lizard go!
Someone might have donated after feb 28th to AGS and gets close to nothing although he contributed the most to PLAY in terms of funding. Getting BTSX holders behind PLAY makes sense too but why should they get so much more than AGS/PTS without having contributed to funding?
Are we going to have proto-dac to trade and build up delegate infrastructure?
