BitShares Forum

Main => 中文 (Chinese) => Topic started by: Amazon on January 28, 2014, 06:43:55 am

Title: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: Amazon on January 28, 2014, 06:43:55 am
左起 Charles Hoskinson, Vitalik Buterin, Stan Larimer, Bo Shen


(http://i.imgur.com/es4ZZqn.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/SlIkJvx.jpg)
Title: Re: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: zhao150 on January 28, 2014, 06:55:15 am
Ethereum是3i的项目吗?
你为何给Ethereum做广告,莫非已经和解,甚至合作了
Title: Re: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: checkie on January 28, 2014, 07:22:45 am
什么情况

Sent from my Coolpad 9970 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: nametooshort on January 28, 2014, 01:54:22 pm
Ethereum是3i的项目吗?
你为何给Ethereum做广告,莫非已经和解,甚至合作了
只是大型会议上普通的合影吧……3i和Ethereum的关系也不至于那么差……
Title: Re: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: checkie on January 28, 2014, 03:13:02 pm
技术无界限

Sent from my Coolpad 9970 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: ripplexiaoshan on January 28, 2014, 03:22:44 pm
哈哈,可惜没有看到Dan 和 Charles 的合影
Title: Re: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: Amazon on January 28, 2014, 08:53:38 pm
以后在很多方面可能会有合作,比如法律问题,监管问题。
Title: Re: Invictus与Ethereum合影
Post by: Stan on January 29, 2014, 03:51:30 pm

以后在很多方面可能会有合作,比如法律问题,监管问题。

Yes, and Charles and I even discussed hosting an experimental DAC on each other's platforms just so folks would have a comparable reference architecture for each.  No commitments yet, but we did talk talk about it briefly in Miami.

If we did, people could evaluate the merits of:

Hosting many businesses on one heavy-weight generic chain - at the cost of mining fees.
vs.
Hosting each business on its own light-weight optimized chain - free from mining costs.


Both approaches implement their business logic using a Turing-complete programming language.  (Ours is C++.) The difference is whether dependence on strong mining power pushes you toward "one chain to rule them all" or whether you are free to distribute all earnings to your shareholders instead.

Time will tell.  In the mean time, let a thousand ideas bloom.