It doesn't matter what I say, this topic is never going to go away - I'm just not engaging with it anymore.

As for you NewMine, I think you're ideologically opposed to what we're trying to do here, and I don't trust you at all. You'll be back with another name in no time at all.

It truly does matter what you say because you're the CEO and as CEO you can affect confidence in your coin. Every time you respond you attempt to shift the focus away from you thinking people will forget about the questions being asked. It seems extremely shady to continually dodge legitimate questions. Hopefully you sack up and answer at some point.

I've noticed a correlation between Newmine winning votes and price decreases.

The value recovers somewhat when useful candidates win the positions back, but not quite as much as the drop.

Looks like we've got some serious CMO contenders - hopefully an active CMO can help the market value of the coin.

This was petty as fuck.....The price was dropping well before newmine won. I would say it was the increase in miners pumping and dumping the coin to make a quick buck. I realize you're under attack right now in another thread but it doesn't behoove you to step down to this level and point fingers. 

Quote from: Velocd on January 03, 2014, 08:09:17 pm

I'm no dev and I'm somewhat new to crypto but it seems like the gpu miner being open source would be better for the community. If the dev is looking to be compensated for their work then maybe the community can buy it from him. Or maybe the Board could purchase or license it from them. Maybe for a percentage of the salary the board makes for x amount of time could be given to the dev so that they can open up the source.

Just kind of spitballing here but I'm sure some kind of agreement could be made with the dev.

It was one of the key points of donschoe's application as CTO to use parts of the salary to buy the code from the dev. Community doesn't really care as it seems.

Makes sense. Coin was supposed to gpu resistant.

Quote from: FaSan on January 03, 2014, 07:10:11 pm

Quote from: seraphim on January 03, 2014, 06:48:21 pm

Quote from: FaSan on January 03, 2014, 06:41:15 pm

It's a developer choice. And you free to choice to use it or not.


I'm sorry but I really disapprove this thread

FaSan

reorder is the author afaik, so it's kind of approved by him.

and isn't the whole crypto movement about freedom? being able to re software is very important for decentralization.

following your argument, there still would be no ntfs-support in linux...and that's just one example

we're not only fighting the established currencies, but the whole narrow-minded profit-oriented system!

Very simple choice. Leave the 1gh pool empty, and tell that we come back IF reorder will publish the code open. This can be a right way.

FaSan

yeap, http://mmcpool.com/ forever! 

That's a CPU mining pool correct?

I don't think decompiling the gpu miner is  appropriate since the author didn't make it open-source in the first place.

Coin is open source. CPU miner is open source. How does keeping the gpu miner source closed help the community?  Does the author also operate the pool or are they partnered with 1gh. I'm not accusing or anything, just asking questions. Gpu mining is obviously popular and quite powerful. Shouldn't more pools have access to the gpu miner? Wouldn't this ultimately help the coin and create some competition between the pools?

Quote from: kotofey on January 02, 2014, 11:59:59 pm

The price goes down, because miners want sell their MMC as quickly as possible. 

As a person who was cpu mining MMC until the gpu miner was released, I completely agree.  It's depressing watching the price & profitability plummet for no good reason other than people undercutting prices for a quick sale. 

In the long term, those morons are cutting everyone's, including their own golden goose's neck, and destabilizing the currency in the process with their short sightedness.

The funny thing is, you can see the same with the majority of alt cryptos ever since the news stories broke in the media.  The general public saw nothing but a get rich quick scheme in their mind, and have no idea of the market consequences, & don't care about ruining the value or destroying the public confidence in the currency with their grab for the instant payoff... 

It doesn't help that the 1gh pool is suggesting to use a bter.com wallet address for deposits. That just enables dumping the coin. The other part that is hurting this coin is the fact that it's sitting on one exchange at the moment. The good thing is that this coin isn't a copy paste. It's not associated with a meme and its not being pumped and dumped. This will be a long term coin. That being said it does need to gain traction in the crypto world. Good thing is there will be a CEO that will be responsible for that.